FlyerTalk Forums

FlyerTalk Forums (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/index.php)
-   SkyTeam (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/skyteam-412/)
-   -   New airlines for SkyTeam (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/skyteam/875915-new-airlines-skyteam.html)

tomh009 Nov 1, 2008 7:00 pm


Originally Posted by pbarnette (Post 10522824)
Don't forget that a Gold or Plat will usually earn somewhere between 100% and 700% more miles for partner flights with ST, than you do in OW or *A, as you do not usually earn elite bonuses on partners in those alliances, and because partial credit fares are much more common (i.e. virtually all BA coach fares, and most intra-European SK fares earn 25% mileage).

Notably AC does offer elite bonuses, at 0/50/100%. Not as generous as NW (which has 50/100/125%), but they're still there.


Originally Posted by pbarnette (Post 10522824)
Even worse, in *A, is the maddening practice of having mileage accrual follow the operating carrier. Accordingly, when you book a codeshare, you have no idea how much your ticket will earn.

That's really the same as ST -- benefits depend on the operating carrier. On NW-coded but CO-operated flights, you might also only earn 50%. Ironically, while AC sells lots of tickets with 25-50% accrual on its own program, booking those same flights (at the same price) on UA paper typically earns 100% accrual on the AC FFP.

Burj Nov 1, 2008 8:32 pm


Originally Posted by aaron1262 (Post 10524722)
I think that Uzbekistani airways is an obscure choice. they don't really have much service? seriously...how many people actually NEED to go to Tashkent besides people who live there?

ACTUALLY....just did some checking and if I am not mistaken, if Uzbekistan Airways does join Skyteam it would be the ONLY one that flies to Pakistan. They fly to Lahore, which isn't even the biggest city in Pakistan.

Seems like a pretty big hole, especially considering that Karachi, the largest city, is well served by various *A partners (SQ, TK, Thai...)

NW has an agreement with Malaysia which serves Pakistan, but what will happen post merger?

Is there any official reason why MH is NOT being considered by SkyTeam? Seems like a good counter to *A's SQ and Thai!

pbarnette Nov 2, 2008 2:39 am


Originally Posted by tomh009 (Post 10614388)
Notably AC does offer elite bonuses, at 0/50/100%. Not as generous as NW (which has 50/100/125%), but they're still there.

That is only for AC flights. The only elite bonus for partner flights is 25% (regardless of elite level) for LX, LH, BD, and ANA flights. With UA's program, you only get elite bonuses on LH TATL, due to the JV. The Euro carriers tend to offer lower bonuses (25%/50%) so the ST advantage would remain, there, but I believe only BD offers bonuses on partners. Paid F does, on some carriers, bring 300% miles in LH and BD's programs, so those that often fly paid F, this can be a boon.


Originally Posted by tomh009 (Post 10614388)
That's really the same as ST -- benefits depend on the operating carrier. On NW-coded but CO-operated flights, you might also only earn 50%. Ironically, while AC sells lots of tickets with 25-50% accrual on its own program, booking those same flights (at the same price) on UA paper typically earns 100% accrual on the AC FFP.

With the notable exception of the 50% EQM thing on CO, ST operates largely on the basis of the ticketing carrier, not the operating carrier. And even in the CO instance, the RDM accrual is the same. In most *A programs (perhaps AC is different), the operating carrier is the determining factor. Check out this wording from the UA website:


The miles accrued are determined by the operating airline. Please note that the booking class shown on your ticket may differ from the booking class relevant for mileage accrual.
Heck, I could live with the operating carrier rule, but no *A carrier actually provides a conversion chart. If you are buying anything less than Full-Y, you have pretty much no clue as to how much you are earning. For those few differences in the ST program (e.g. CO flights earn 50% EQMs) this is spelled out.

grahampros Nov 2, 2008 5:56 am

Ah, so they finally announce the replacement for CO:rolleyes:

No thank you to TAS. Was there workign with the airline back in 2000 and it's my least favorative place I've been out of 50+ international cities. I found the city full of corruption and someone always trying to rip you off. Cold, sterile former soviet repulbic was my experince.

respectable_man Nov 2, 2008 9:15 am

The nice move would be to dump AZ (pathetic under any light) and go for Austrian, which has very nice coverage of the near East and former SU.

pbarnette Nov 2, 2008 10:06 am


Originally Posted by respectable_man (Post 10616321)
The nice move would be to dump AZ (pathetic under any light) and go for Austrian, which has very nice coverage of the near East and former SU.

Austrian will go to the same alliance as whomever buys it. My understanding is that LH is the only carrier to make a bid. AF/KL expressed interest but didn't submit a bid. AZ is pathetic, though. About the only European mid-major of any value left might be SK. LH is considered the front-runner for them, as well.

nomad1974 Nov 2, 2008 10:11 am


Originally Posted by RobtheAggie (Post 10517316)
[

Anyone want to go to Tashkent?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uzbekistan_Airways

Uzbekistan is DEFINITELY on my list. Hopefully this will make it slightly easier, incl. the domestic flights.

nomad1974 Nov 2, 2008 10:15 am


Originally Posted by respectable_man (Post 10616321)
The nice move would be to dump AZ (pathetic under any light) and go for Austrian, which has very nice coverage of the near East and former SU.

Why dump them?! Does it bother you?! It serves quite a lot of people, has decent fares and 100% mileage earning in all classes (at least for WP, FB, etc). If you don't like them, don't fly them (this holds for all/any airlines).

DanTravels Nov 2, 2008 10:23 am


Originally Posted by respectable_man (Post 10616321)
The nice move would be to dump AZ (pathetic under any light) and go for Austrian, which has very nice coverage of the near East and former SU.


Originally Posted by nomad1974 (Post 10616550)
Why dump them?! Does it bother you?! It serves quite a lot of people, has decent fares and 100% mileage earning in all classes (at least for WP, FB, etc). If you don't like them, don't fly them (this holds for all/any airlines).

AZ looks to be dumping itself. Last Saturday or Sunday there was an ad in the FT listing 5-7 insolvency court dates (and names of judges) for AZ between mid-November and late January. A colleague just flew home Sunday night on Brussels because AZ staff in Rome could only tell her that they would be waiting until after the staff should-we-strike meeting Monday to decide whether they were flying Monday.

Real nice, AZ.

hw711 Nov 2, 2008 12:51 pm

I'm still waiting for CI to join. Don't know what's taking so long.

TrayflowInUK Nov 2, 2008 1:44 pm

Somebody said GOL (Brazilian airline) was potentially going to join... any truth to that rumour?

Yaatri Nov 3, 2008 4:17 am


Originally Posted by RobtheAggie (Post 10517316)


Originally Posted by Blank Sheet (Post 10522814)
Actually, Yes I do want to go.

I do too. Uzbekistan is quite interesting.

respectable_man Nov 3, 2008 10:46 am


Originally Posted by nomad1974 (Post 10616550)
Why dump them?! Does it bother you?! It serves quite a lot of people, has decent fares and 100% mileage earning in all classes (at least for WP, FB, etc). If you don't like them, don't fly them (this holds for all/any airlines).

Regrettably I cannot recall who told me the story of his AZ flight scheduled to MXP that landed without notice in LIN. Of course AZ staff would do nothing to help him and - of course - he missed his connection ex-MXP. Maybe the plane was diverted so the AZ staff in LIN could go back home in FCO.

If this were an isolated example of the level of service on AZ, that would be horrible enough.

... and yes I try to avoid them. I would much rather AZ fail and be replaced by an airline that would be half as crazy and twice as reliable. YMMV.

respectable_man Nov 3, 2008 10:49 am


Originally Posted by pbarnette (Post 10616513)
Austrian will go to the same alliance as whomever buys it. My understanding is that LH is the only carrier to make a bid. AF/KL expressed interest but didn't submit a bid.

As I recall, AF/KL did not submit a binding offer. Anyways.... I agree that it will go to whomever buys it.

Isn't SK also partly owned by LH?

LAXRuss Nov 3, 2008 11:16 am

I note that the article optimistically states "Uzbekistan Airways joins SkyTeam" and then goes on to mention "The first stage in negotiations between Sky Team Alliance and Uzbekistan Airlines was held in Tashkent"--i.e. FIRST STAGE

I have friends who have flown Uzbekistan Airways and they claim the service is absolutely dismal. I would assume that an airline alliance such as Sky Team not only coordinates schedules but also sets minimal service standards. From what I have heard, although I admit I have no personal experience, I would view it an absolute miracle if Uzbekistan Airways joined SkyTeam this year and was effectively in a position to offer the level of service I would expect from a SkyTeam carrier/partner--i.e. comparable to NW/KL/DL/AF.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 1:44 pm.


This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.