Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Disappointed in regional A350 J

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 1, 2024, 8:06 am
  #1  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Tokyo, Japan
Programs: JAL Global Club & oneworld Sapphire, ANA SFC & Star Alliance Gold
Posts: 3,747
Disappointed in regional A350 J

[size=16px]Total first world problem, but I've had a few flights recently on regional A350s in J and am really surprised at how cramped the seat is. I've flown in staggered layouts before (ANA A380 and 777), and those felt much more spacious. On SQ the space between rows is so tight that I can't stretch my legs at all without putting my feet on the ottoman. And I'm a small person.[/size]

[size=16px]The other problem is that the "bed" is not really flat. There is dip in the middle, which puts more pressure on my calves (because my thighs are not supported due to the dip in the surface). It's not comfortable for sleeping, and I'm really glad I didn't have a redeye flight on this plane. (Despite being supposedly a "regional" plane, this A350 is used on some flights of 7 or 8 hours and some redeyes.) Again, similar staggered seats on ANA are truly flat and are much more comfortable for sleeping.[/size]

[size=16px]I feel like SQ really blew it with this seat. Anyone else feel the same? (I did a search and couldn't find a thread dedicated to the regional A350.)

Edited to add: I'm now sitting on my connecting flight which is an A380. I've flown on SQ's A380 before, but I had forgotten how spacious the J seats are. This J seat is a totally different world from A350 regional J. Almost feels like a different class of service, it's so much more spacious. [/size]

Last edited by Unimatrix One; Mar 1, 2024 at 8:32 am
Unimatrix One is offline  
Old Mar 27, 2024, 11:32 am
  #2  
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: NY
Programs: AA Plat Pro, KrisFlyer Elite Gold
Posts: 578
totally agree, A350 J is definitely regional product
sriegert is offline  
Old Mar 27, 2024, 5:59 pm
  #3  
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Programs: QRPC Platinum, KFEG
Posts: 999
I fly the regional A350 a lot and every time my mind goes towards complaining I'm forcing myself to think I could also be on a Lufthansa or BA 4 hour intra-European "business class" flight with just a blocked middle economy seat.
THR and eponymous_coward like this.
AAtticus is offline  
Old Mar 27, 2024, 9:59 pm
  #4  
 
Join Date: May 2007
Programs: UA 1K, Hyatt Globalist
Posts: 5,459
Or even compare it with the likes of CX and NH, who fly recliners on 3-8 hour "regional" flights. I don't mind such a seat on something as long as a 5h CTS-HKG daytime flight, but NH currently flies those seats on an 8h HND-CGK overnight flight.
eponymous_coward likes this.
dkc192 is offline  
Old Mar 28, 2024, 12:24 am
  #5  
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: AUH
Posts: 8,267
I hate how narrow the Regional J seat is around the shoulders and how claustrophobic it feels as a result, as well as the lack of PY on those aircraft.
stargold is offline  
Old Mar 28, 2024, 4:53 am
  #6  
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Singapore
Programs: QF LTG, SQ EGTP, Bonvoy LTG
Posts: 4,847
Yields. Quite simply if the route is relatively low yielding they’re going to stick to a denser product to make the economics work.

No amount of moaning is going to make a difference.

The only solutions for passenger is to fly alternative airlines or to alternative ports and connect to another flight or transfer over land. (eg into MEL instead of ADL, HND instead of NGO etc. )
lokijuh is offline  
Old Mar 28, 2024, 6:08 am
  #7  
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: AUH
Posts: 8,267
SQ could have easily designed / selected a better seat, so it's not just about yields - TG's A359 has the same layout but is a much more comfortable seat, for example.
stargold is offline  
Old Mar 28, 2024, 6:43 am
  #8  
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Tokyo
Posts: 1,580
Exactly. Totally understand it will need a certain level of density, but (especially as a longlegged bigfooted person who is slim but broadshouldered) I would be quite happy to sacrifice the silly lengths they go to for “privacy” on seats these days in favor of a more open and airy and ROOMY seat…
pesos is offline  
Old Mar 28, 2024, 5:18 pm
  #9  
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: BOS
Programs: Hyatt Diamond, Mosaic
Posts: 1,050
Wish they would go with properly padding, comfy armcharis for regional routes. Lieflat is, at most, a niche need for regional flights where there isn't enough time for sleeping anyway.
pWei is offline  
Old Mar 28, 2024, 5:41 pm
  #10  
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Programs: SQ TPPS/*G, Starlux Explorer, (Almost Lifetime) Hyatt Globalist
Posts: 1,413
It's relative. For those that were/are frequent SQ flyers, the new regional 1-2-1 lie flat J was a decent enough upgrade over the 2-2-2 angled lie flat. Additionally, CX was/is generally using a quite uncomfortable 2-2-2 J on many regional flights, so the SQ seat also checked that box in surpassing CX (irrespective of some of the flaws).
bpk6h is online now  
Old Mar 28, 2024, 7:43 pm
  #11  
 
Join Date: Dec 2023
Posts: 8
As a regional biz class seat, I think it's perfectly acceptable, especially when comparing with the competitors.

Isn't TK using the same seat for their long haul flights?

K
TheRealBabushka likes this.
KFlyee is offline  
Old Mar 28, 2024, 9:03 pm
  #12  
 
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 586
Originally Posted by pWei
Wish they would go with properly padding, comfy armcharis for regional routes. Lieflat is, at most, a niche need for regional flights where there isn't enough time for sleeping anyway.
You mean you wish we were back to Ultimo?


epigram is offline  
Old Mar 29, 2024, 2:14 am
  #13  
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: SIN (LEJ once a year)
Programs: SQ, LH, BA, IHG Diamond AMB, HH Gold, SLH Indulged, Accor Gold, Hyatt Discoverist
Posts: 7,739
Originally Posted by KFlyee
As a regional biz class seat, I think it's perfectly acceptable, especially when comparing with the competitors.

Isn't TK using the same seat for their long haul flights?

K
Yes, TK is using this seat model as they current long haul Biz (apart from the 2-3-3 version on 77W).

As another poster mentioned it, to me, the TG seat version of this product is similarly tight and I don't see it as an improvement over the SQ seat, also not from a padding perspective and TG seats can be in crappy shape on top of that.

I can arrange myself well in the SQ seat, even at 1.80m, but I do find the entry / exit to and from the seat quite tight.
demue is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.