Community
Wiki Posts
Search

A350-900 ULR Singapore Airlines

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 1, 2018, 10:19 pm
  #76  
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 46
If you folks had the choice of only one of SQ 21 or SQ 22 in business, which would you pick?

SQ 21, 9:45am to 5:15pm seems like more reasonable timing, as you can enjoy a nice meal service after taking off and before landing with (a lot of) sleep in between.
SQ 22, 12:40am to 5:30am feels like a SUUUUPER long redeye. I'm not sure I'd want to eat right after getting on that flight and then I'm not sure if the meal service would even be aligned when when I get my appetite back.

Also, saver award availability == upgradeability from PE right? So if I can search a 92k miles business award, then it should be safe to book a PE flexi ticket and transfer 47k miles into my SQ account for the upgrade...?

Originally Posted by j3brooklyn
I was unable to find a single day where a business class award seat for 92K miles (saver rate) was available on this flight, even at the end of their schedule. As was suggested by the phone interaction, it appears that awards/upgrades on this flight are currently blocked. Please post if you have been able to book an award on this flight.
I am definitely seeing saver business redemptions available, 184k miles for a round-trip, though haven't grabbed one yet. Have you tried looking at itineraries that connect in SIN?
mizzao is offline  
Old Aug 2, 2018, 10:38 am
  #77  
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: New York, New York
Programs: AA Gold, Alaska MVP; Free Agent Super Duper Diamond Treasure Chest ;)
Posts: 4,682
Originally Posted by mizzao
If you folks had the choice of only one of SQ 21 or SQ 22 in business, which would you pick?

SQ 21, 9:45am to 5:15pm seems like more reasonable timing, as you can enjoy a nice meal service after taking off and before landing with (a lot of) sleep in between.
SQ 22, 12:40am to 5:30am feels like a SUUUUPER long redeye. I'm not sure I'd want to eat right after getting on that flight and then I'm not sure if the meal service would even be aligned when when I get my appetite back.
Yeah, that SQ22 is going to be a really long night. I am choosing between the A380 to JFK (via FRA) and the A350ULR. Leaning towards the 350 to EWR purely for bragging rights that I have flown the world's longest flight.
knit-in is offline  
Old Aug 2, 2018, 5:47 pm
  #78  
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: USA
Posts: 91
Originally Posted by mizzao
If you folks had the choice of only one of SQ 21 or SQ 22 in business, which would you pick?

SQ 21, 9:45am to 5:15pm seems like more reasonable timing, as you can enjoy a nice meal service after taking off and before landing with (a lot of) sleep in between.
SQ 22, 12:40am to 5:30am feels like a SUUUUPER long redeye. I'm not sure I'd want to eat right after getting on that flight and then I'm not sure if the meal service would even be aligned when when I get my appetite back.

Also, saver award availability == upgradeability from PE right? So if I can search a 92k miles business award, then it should be safe to book a PE flexi ticket and transfer 47k miles into my SQ account for the upgrade...?



I am definitely seeing saver business redemptions available, 184k miles for a round-trip, though haven't grabbed one yet. Have you tried looking at itineraries that connect in SIN?
Personally I would prefer the SIN-EWR leg. Try to get as much sleep as possible on the flight and survive the next day on the ground by coffee beans.
yuzheny is offline  
Old Aug 3, 2018, 1:24 am
  #79  
Suspended
 
Join Date: May 2018
Location: ord
Programs: UA 1k SPG Platinum
Posts: 365
many moons ago I did this flight with the A345 and sin-ewr was only 15hrs, so the flight is NOT always a very long flight. I wonder if the A350 flys any faster than those junk A345s.
mellon is offline  
Old Aug 3, 2018, 3:54 am
  #80  
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Singapore
Programs: QF LTG, SQ EGTP, Bonvoy LTG
Posts: 4,847
Originally Posted by knit-in
Yeah, that SQ22 is going to be a really long night. I am choosing between the A380 to JFK (via FRA) and the A350ULR. Leaning towards the 350 to EWR purely for bragging rights that I have flown the world's longest flight.
All depends on your attitude. I’ve found that the problem with most “red eyes” is that they are too short for a good sleep, which is why they are called redeyes.

The good thing about such long flights without stops (at least in business class) is you don’t get interrupted mid flight. The new SQ 22 timetable is almost the same as the old SQ 21 timetable (EWR-SIN). That’s flight was good for post take off supper. Try and stay awake as long as one can then sleep for a while, enjoy a snack and movie and maybe some more sleep then a breakfast before landing. I’d say it’s better than , for example SQ 26 where you have the FRA interruption.
lokijuh is offline  
Old Aug 13, 2018, 9:20 am
  #81  
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Portland OR & Bangkok
Programs: United GS, Marriott Ambassador
Posts: 662
Originally Posted by djsflynn
While Singapore Airlines hasn't made this explicit in its press release (hence some confusion and speculation) the ULR will use the same business class seat as the standard A350-900. We quizzed the airline on ULR seating at the time of the non-stop NY announcement and SQ media advised "We have chosen to use a consistent product across our long-haul A350 fleet."
Originally Posted by djsflynn
Yes they are [edit: SQ confirmed this to us a few months back].
Is this still confirmed that they will use the same seats (that makes you sleep at a weird angle)?

The new lie-flat regional seat seams to look better.

Thinking about booking a RT in business (paid) but really dread that sleeping position!
kittiyut is offline  
Old Aug 22, 2018, 9:31 pm
  #82  
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: New York, New York
Programs: AA Gold, Alaska MVP; Free Agent Super Duper Diamond Treasure Chest ;)
Posts: 4,682
Here are a few things SQ is planning specifically for the A359-ULR

https://www.wsj.com/articles/the-sci...39076?mod=e2fb
knit-in is offline  
Old Aug 23, 2018, 9:29 am
  #83  
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Portland OR & Bangkok
Programs: United GS, Marriott Ambassador
Posts: 662
Originally Posted by knit-in
Here are a few things SQ is planning specifically for the A359-ULR

https://www.wsj.com/articles/the-sci...39076?mod=e2fb
I'd like to read the article, but I don't have a subscription to the WSJ
kittiyut is offline  
Old Aug 23, 2018, 9:47 am
  #84  
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: New York, New York
Programs: AA Gold, Alaska MVP; Free Agent Super Duper Diamond Treasure Chest ;)
Posts: 4,682
Originally Posted by kittiyut
I'd like to read the article, but I don't have a subscription to the WSJ
I don't either, but it worked for me. They allow you to read it once you've clicked out of their subscription message.
knit-in is offline  
Old Aug 23, 2018, 4:07 pm
  #85  
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Long Beach, CA
Programs: AA PLTPRO, HH Diamond, IHG Plat, Marriott Plat, Hyatt Globalist
Posts: 3,559
Interestingly, at least one of these A350ULRs is going to have the same registration as a prior A345: 9V-SGE
I happened to look through my list of previously flown aircraft and was curious to see what had become of the A345 that I flew LAX-SIN a few years back.
It came up with this: https://www.airfleets.net/ficheapp/plane-a350-216.htm

I wonder if it's just a coincidence or if the other A345s that were in the fleet will have their reg numbers transferred to the new A350ULRs
OskiBear is online now  
Old Aug 25, 2018, 1:58 pm
  #86  
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: LAX
Posts: 3,267
If you don't have access to the WSJ, don't worry...the article is fairly general.

Basically, it says that Qantas, Singapore, and other airlines are putting a lot of energy into the science of long flights. They're adjusting menus to keep people hydrated, adjusting food items so they'll keep/reheat properly after being stored aboard the aircraft for long hours before serving, and trying to find ways to encourage people to get up and move around the cabin (like serving more soup) to avoid DVT.
lobo411 is offline  
Old Aug 31, 2018, 4:36 am
  #87  
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: LAX IAH AMS
Programs: UA GS 1MM
Posts: 1,267
I've read through this thread but thought I would ask for clarification... I have avoided the A350 J product several times simply because of the terrible reviews of the seat. I am "large" by global standards... haha... 6'3"+ so I require a bit more room.

From what I have read, the J seats are going to be the same on the ULR as the XWB, but will the spacing between the rows be the same? Sounds like that's the biggest issue with the current seats.... seams like they are crammed in from row to row.
avi8tir is offline  
Old Aug 31, 2018, 8:55 am
  #88  
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: SFO
Posts: 3,881
Originally Posted by avi8tir
From what I have read, the J seats are going to be the same on the ULR as the XWB, but will the spacing between the rows be the same?
Won't know until the plane is in service. The 2013 J seat is the same on all A350s and almost all the 773s but there is/will likely be subtle differences.
Troopers is online now  
Old Aug 31, 2018, 2:50 pm
  #89  
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: MSP
Posts: 185
Just booked on SQ33 SFO-SIN (3x weekly) in Dec in PE. Looking forward to the flight - I like the timings, evening departure from SFO, early morning arrival in SIN. Not sure how I feel about 17 hours of darkness, but looking forward to the experience.

Last edited by zeebanker; Aug 31, 2018 at 3:03 pm
zeebanker is offline  
Old Sep 3, 2018, 12:07 pm
  #90  
Suspended
 
Join Date: May 2018
Location: ord
Programs: UA 1k SPG Platinum
Posts: 365
I just booked the sin-EWR for Jan, excited to give this a try again! Where did SQ 345 planes go that flew this route years ago?
mellon is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.