Platinum & Late Check Out Benefit
#16
Original Poster


Join Date: Nov 2018
Programs: EK Skywards, BA Silver, Sindbad, Accor ALL Platinum, Flying Blue Platinum, IHG, Enrich
Posts: 224
For the record, yesterday, I did attempt a dummy booking to see what was available & yes, in my (upgraded) room type there was only one room available but, seemingly plenty for all other room types; Id have rather had the late checkout over the upgrade.
#17
Original Poster


Join Date: Nov 2018
Programs: EK Skywards, BA Silver, Sindbad, Accor ALL Platinum, Flying Blue Platinum, IHG, Enrich
Posts: 224
Perhaps this could be a Wiki topic, as Im sure Im not the only one that would like to avoid hotels that refuse/decline late checkout until the day of departure. Lets include early check in as well.
#18
Original Poster


Join Date: Nov 2018
Programs: EK Skywards, BA Silver, Sindbad, Accor ALL Platinum, Flying Blue Platinum, IHG, Enrich
Posts: 224
#19
Original Poster


Join Date: Nov 2018
Programs: EK Skywards, BA Silver, Sindbad, Accor ALL Platinum, Flying Blue Platinum, IHG, Enrich
Posts: 224
Even if Diamond, this is happening all the time. They tell you to ask the last day and then it's frequent to have to negotiate. I agree it's very unpractical as you often need to organize your day accordingly.
You certainly know that with Accor, most benefits are if this, if that, and if the weather is nice. What many here on this forum has faced is a refusal for free late checkout because hotel is full, but if you want to pay for late checkout (as a paid option proposed by most hotels now), then it becomes available. It's magic
.
You certainly know that with Accor, most benefits are if this, if that, and if the weather is nice. What many here on this forum has faced is a refusal for free late checkout because hotel is full, but if you want to pay for late checkout (as a paid option proposed by most hotels now), then it becomes available. It's magic
.Perhaps we should have a Wiki on this specific issue because, as you say, last day is unpractical.
#20
FlyerTalk Evangelist




Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Paris, France
Programs: AF/KL Flying Blue Ultimate/Platinum for life/Club2000, Accor ALL Diamond
Posts: 25,046
- hotels generally reluctant to provide ALL benefits are certainly more prone to deny late check out. Those are certainly more prominent in Europe than RoW
- small/medium-size hotels cannot afford to have housekeeping staff past a certain time, especially in countries with high labor costs. I remember a Mercure in France fully booked for the next evening refusing me honestly a checkout at 4 pm because their last housekeeping person leaves at 2 pm, and of course, I totally understand that. But another day, they accepted because hotel not full and they just keep the room uncleaned until the next day when housekeeping can take care of it.
- hotels in Asia and US are often bigger and often provides turn down service in the evening, so they have staff available at late time to clean rooms.
At the end, I believe it always goes back to the management, how they value loyalty and how they instill this attitude within their team.
#21



Join Date: Jul 2024
Programs: IHG Diamond Elite Ambassador, Accor Platinum, Marriott Bonvoy Gold Elite, Lufthansa Senator. DPNA.
Posts: 1,250
Good question...more in Europe, could be, but more than a cultural factor, I think there could be other reasons to take into account. From my experience :
- hotels generally reluctant to provide ALL benefits are certainly more prone to deny late check out. Those are certainly more prominent in Europe than RoW
- small/medium-size hotels cannot afford to have housekeeping staff past a certain time, especially in countries with high labor costs. I remember a Mercure in France fully booked for the next evening refusing me honestly a checkout at 4 pm because their last housekeeping person leaves at 2 pm, and of course, I totally understand that. But another day, they accepted because hotel not full and they just keep the room uncleaned until the next day when housekeeping can take care of it.
- hotels in Asia and US are often bigger and often provides turn down service in the evening, so they have staff available at late time to clean rooms.
At the end, I believe it always goes back to the management, how they value loyalty and how they instill this attitude within their team.
- hotels generally reluctant to provide ALL benefits are certainly more prone to deny late check out. Those are certainly more prominent in Europe than RoW
- small/medium-size hotels cannot afford to have housekeeping staff past a certain time, especially in countries with high labor costs. I remember a Mercure in France fully booked for the next evening refusing me honestly a checkout at 4 pm because their last housekeeping person leaves at 2 pm, and of course, I totally understand that. But another day, they accepted because hotel not full and they just keep the room uncleaned until the next day when housekeeping can take care of it.
- hotels in Asia and US are often bigger and often provides turn down service in the evening, so they have staff available at late time to clean rooms.
At the end, I believe it always goes back to the management, how they value loyalty and how they instill this attitude within their team.
Right now im staying in Sofitel Macau, and check out for the weekend tomorrow, will be back on Sunday, but even if the hotel is fully booked during the weekend, no problem at all with late check out tomorrow. They have housekeeping late.
#22



Join Date: May 2024
Programs: MB AMB, Accor PLAT, LH SEN
Posts: 420
At brands like Mercure and Novotel in Europe, in my experience it is the norm rather than the exception to be told to ask on the day of checkout. But when I do, its usually fine.
On the other hand, the Pullman Shanghai Central recently basically forced a 4pm late checkout on me just in case even when I indicated that Id have to leave early anyway
On the other hand, the Pullman Shanghai Central recently basically forced a 4pm late checkout on me just in case even when I indicated that Id have to leave early anyway
#23




Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: BNE
Programs: QF Gold, VA Gold, IHG Spire, Accor Plat, Marriot Plat, Hilton Diamond
Posts: 2,320
#24
Guest

Join Date: Nov 2024
Posts: 619
#25
that was the mantra pandanus in Darwin so not one that most will head to
#26



Join Date: Jul 2024
Programs: IHG Diamond Elite Ambassador, Accor Platinum, Marriott Bonvoy Gold Elite, Lufthansa Senator. DPNA.
Posts: 1,250
So I have different opinions, so just argue against them. In this case, yes I think you should "summon" the managers if they dont provide reasonable benefits according to the program. Nothing wrong with that. Actually, they might also like to get first hand feedback from the guests.
#27



Join Date: May 2024
Programs: MB AMB, Accor PLAT, LH SEN
Posts: 420
Its the publicly admonish part which some of us find, shall we say, questionable.
#28
Moderator, Turkish Airlines Miles&Smiles & Accor ALL



Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: BRU
Programs: TK*G, Accor ALL Diamond
Posts: 8,213
Everyone take a deep breath and relax a little. I would like to remind you all of the FT Rules https://www.flyertalk.com/help/rules#gettingpersonal If anyone has a problem with a post please contact me by flagging the post concerned. There is no reason at all to start a public spat. 
starfyergold
Accor ALL forum moderator

starfyergold
Accor ALL forum moderator
#29
Original Poster


Join Date: Nov 2018
Programs: EK Skywards, BA Silver, Sindbad, Accor ALL Platinum, Flying Blue Platinum, IHG, Enrich
Posts: 224
Currently staying at the Bucharest Unirii Square - Handwritten Collection. This morning I enquired about a late checkout for tomorrow; it was granted immediately with a no problem sir.
#30
FlyerTalk Evangelist and Ambassador: The British Airways Club




Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Somewhere between 0 and 13,000 metres high
Programs: AF/KL Life Plat, BA GGL+GfL, ALL Diam, Hilton Diam, Marriott Gold, blablablah, etc
Posts: 33,190
So the first thing to note is that of course, the ALL late check out is not a "always" but a "subject to availability" benefit. That's different to, say, the FHR late check out benefit which is "guaranteed".
Some hotels have a bad tendency to say no to (complimentary) late check out as a matter of course even when they could easily do it - Sofitel New York will come to many people's minds. But then in fairness, I think that is common to many NYC hotels in general and I have had exactly the same issue with, say, Hilton properties (also as a Diamond).
Where hotels are not openly antagonistic, though, I would say that in my experience, unless the hotel occupancy is particularly low, it is actually the norm that the late check out (or at least the exact time of the late check out) has to be confirmed in the morning of departure and not before. The reason for it is that this is the time when the hotel has the best understanding of occupancy and room allocation. In that sense, the three crucial questions are: 1) is the hotel quite lightly or quite heavily booked on the day of your departure, 2) has your specific room been allocated to a new guest on that day and 3) if so, does the hotel have an ETA for the new guest.
The point is that of course, a hotel can't give you a 4pm late check out if they have another guest checking in the room at 4pm. That's just not possible and that wouldn't be fair. On the other hand, if your room is not to be reallocated on your day or departure, or if you want a 2pm late check out and they know that the next guest won't arrive before 10pm (and this is a luxurious enough hotel that they have continuous availability of cleaning staff - note that many cheaper properties only have cleaning staff at very specific times to save money which further complicates things), then they should make an effort.
Personally, I certainly wouldn't do the "manager" thing. Everyone to their own but this is simply not my style unless there is a significant problem, and being told something subject to availability is not available doesn't qualify by my book. However, I would feel free to ask specific questions such as:
1) At what time will you know for sure whether I can keep the room?
2) If you can't confirm 3pm now, could you at least confirm - e.g. 1pm and I'll just check if more is possible in the morning>?
3) (If booking several rooms) I understand you may be heavily booked, but would it be possible to assure that we keep at least one of the rooms please?
4) Do you know if there is a new guest allocated this room today?
I personally find those approaches (polite and to the point) typically more productive. The only case where I'd be getting really annoyed is if I'm told I can't get a complimentary late check out but I can get one if I pay.
Some hotels have a bad tendency to say no to (complimentary) late check out as a matter of course even when they could easily do it - Sofitel New York will come to many people's minds. But then in fairness, I think that is common to many NYC hotels in general and I have had exactly the same issue with, say, Hilton properties (also as a Diamond).
Where hotels are not openly antagonistic, though, I would say that in my experience, unless the hotel occupancy is particularly low, it is actually the norm that the late check out (or at least the exact time of the late check out) has to be confirmed in the morning of departure and not before. The reason for it is that this is the time when the hotel has the best understanding of occupancy and room allocation. In that sense, the three crucial questions are: 1) is the hotel quite lightly or quite heavily booked on the day of your departure, 2) has your specific room been allocated to a new guest on that day and 3) if so, does the hotel have an ETA for the new guest.
The point is that of course, a hotel can't give you a 4pm late check out if they have another guest checking in the room at 4pm. That's just not possible and that wouldn't be fair. On the other hand, if your room is not to be reallocated on your day or departure, or if you want a 2pm late check out and they know that the next guest won't arrive before 10pm (and this is a luxurious enough hotel that they have continuous availability of cleaning staff - note that many cheaper properties only have cleaning staff at very specific times to save money which further complicates things), then they should make an effort.
Personally, I certainly wouldn't do the "manager" thing. Everyone to their own but this is simply not my style unless there is a significant problem, and being told something subject to availability is not available doesn't qualify by my book. However, I would feel free to ask specific questions such as:
1) At what time will you know for sure whether I can keep the room?
2) If you can't confirm 3pm now, could you at least confirm - e.g. 1pm and I'll just check if more is possible in the morning>?
3) (If booking several rooms) I understand you may be heavily booked, but would it be possible to assure that we keep at least one of the rooms please?
4) Do you know if there is a new guest allocated this room today?
I personally find those approaches (polite and to the point) typically more productive. The only case where I'd be getting really annoyed is if I'm told I can't get a complimentary late check out but I can get one if I pay.




