BA ANNOUNCEMENT - BA to move to a spend based Tier Point system From 1st April 2025
#2956

Join Date: May 2018
Programs: BA Gold
Posts: 32
There are lots of things BA do that make little sense. Having a celebration bonus to get disgruntled people to rush bookings by Feb 14 that is a pittance with no real incentive effects doesn't make a lot of sense either.
#2957




Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: UK / Dubai
Programs: QR Silver (Ex BA post 2025), Marriott Bonvoy Titanium, Heathrow Rewards Premium, Tesco Clubcard
Posts: 840
road warriors or very frequent travelers would have already bought in to hotel loyalty schemes separately and thats why BAH was never a useful proposition because of my lifetime marriott status, hilton diamond, accor platinum etc etc. further, when i used to travel loads for work (which led to my lifetime marriott status), our corporate rates were significantly lower than rack rates--and BAH will never be able to work with the chains on offering benefits because most, like marriott, have it explicitly set out in their terms and conditions.
so BAH are really limited to either leisure pax or smaller business travelers who do not have a larger corporate agreement or corp travel agency, which is why i still feel that the heavy emphasis on BAH by BA is still a bit misguided if they are seeking the "high spending business market"
so BAH are really limited to either leisure pax or smaller business travelers who do not have a larger corporate agreement or corp travel agency, which is why i still feel that the heavy emphasis on BAH by BA is still a bit misguided if they are seeking the "high spending business market"
But maybe after I obtain Lifetime Platinum then I can consider venturing out to others occasionally (not all the time though, as I enjoy the suite upgrades I get with Marriott
).
#2958



Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: London
Programs: BA - GfL and GGL; TAP *Gold, FB Gold, IC Diamond Elite Ambassador; Diamond Hilton Honors
Posts: 6,741
road warriors or very frequent travelers would have already bought in to hotel loyalty schemes separately and thats why BAH was never a useful proposition because of my lifetime marriott status, hilton diamond, accor platinum etc etc. further, when i used to travel loads for work (which led to my lifetime marriott status), our corporate rates were significantly lower than rack rates--and BAH will never be able to work with the chains on offering benefits because most, like marriott, have it explicitly set out in their terms and conditions.
so BAH are really limited to either leisure pax or smaller business travelers who do not have a larger corporate agreement or corp travel agency, which is why i still feel that the heavy emphasis on BAH by BA is still a bit misguided if they are seeking the "high spending business market"
so BAH are really limited to either leisure pax or smaller business travelers who do not have a larger corporate agreement or corp travel agency, which is why i still feel that the heavy emphasis on BAH by BA is still a bit misguided if they are seeking the "high spending business market"
I had to pay for expensive rooms as part of a BAH to get the lounge access that would have been included with my status.
I have rarely booked BAH for that reason.
It was worth it for the double tier points on the above occasion but not in the future.
#2959


Join Date: Jan 2022
Posts: 1,484
so BAH are really limited to either leisure pax or smaller business travelers who do not have a larger corporate agreement or corp travel agency, which is why i still feel that the heavy emphasis on BAH by BA is still a bit misguided if they are seeking the "high spending business market"
But perhaps they have premium leisure in mind. As an analogy, Hyatt made this big bet on all-inclusive resorts. Seems counter-intuitive considering they mostly catered to premium business travellers. But the times, they are a changing. Maybe BA sees a market of well-off premium leisure travellers which can be bothered to collect with BA but not be bothered to participate in secondary loyalty programs like Hilton Honors or Marriott Bonvoy...
#2960
FlyerTalk Evangelist




Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: JER
Programs: BA Silver again, several MUCCI, and assorted Pensions!
Posts: 32,490
I agree that BAH is totally unattractive for frequent travellers that are active in hotel loyalty programs.
But perhaps they have premium leisure in mind. As an analogy, Hyatt made this big bet on all-inclusive resorts. Seems counter-intuitive considering they mostly catered to premium business travellers. But the times, they are a changing. Maybe BA sees a market of well-off premium leisure travellers which can be bothered to collect with BA but not be bothered to participate in secondary loyalty programs like Hilton Honors or Marriott Bonvoy...
But perhaps they have premium leisure in mind. As an analogy, Hyatt made this big bet on all-inclusive resorts. Seems counter-intuitive considering they mostly catered to premium business travellers. But the times, they are a changing. Maybe BA sees a market of well-off premium leisure travellers which can be bothered to collect with BA but not be bothered to participate in secondary loyalty programs like Hilton Honors or Marriott Bonvoy...
#2961


Join Date: May 2023
Programs: BAEC Silver
Posts: 432
Actually I have always done alright with BAH hotel rooms. Once got upgraded to an Executive Level 2 bath Suite in the Palmer House in Chicago which had a city view. Am far worse with our corporate travel agent for work getting an accessible room smelling of damp due to the Wet Room.
#2963


Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: London, UK
Programs: BAEC
Posts: 2,959
If BAH were to become approved agents for things like four seasons preferred partner then I would absolutely use them most of the time for my travel. Perhaps that’s part of the plan?
#2964



Join Date: Apr 2024
Location: UK
Programs: BA(E)C, ALL, Virgin Red
Posts: 90
I don't think it's been mentioned yet but TFLF just released an open letter which nicely sums up everyone's points: https://www.turningleftforless.com/a...eo-sean-doyle/
#2965


Join Date: Jun 2019
Programs: BAEC GGL/CCR
Posts: 593
In theory rough Łs and points:
LHR-EDI return - Club Europe Ł400
2 nights hotel at Ł200/night
Ł800 total, allowing for non eligible spend perhaps Ł650 = 650 Tier Points (roughly and correct me if I am misunderstanding the new way)
Nearly all of my 30 of so business flights per year are 1/2/3 days hotel stays as well - normally the hotel is not BA but the flight is.
#2966
FlyerTalk Evangelist


Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: London, UK and Southern France
Posts: 18,847
#2967



Join Date: Aug 2011
Programs: Star Alliance Gold
Posts: 1,162
I’ve assumed lounge overcrowding to be one reason for these changes. Just a couple of questions to those who might know: it’s always said that space at big airports, LHR among them, is hugely expensive, meaning lounge expansion would be hugely expensive. Is that true? If it were affordable, couldn’t BA acknowledge that lots of people like their lounges and double the capacity of each one, rather than culling numbers of lounge users?
#2968



Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: JER
Programs: BAEC
Posts: 1,096
#2969


Join Date: Jan 2022
Posts: 1,484
I think they just want to capitalize on their loyalty program. Maybe it will work, I have my doubts. Hotel loyalty has been less devalued than airline loyalty. I certainly value my Hyatt Globalist, IHG Diamond Ambassador, and Marriott Platinum status more than my Miles & More Senator, VS Gold, and (until a few weeks ago) BA Silver.
#2970

Join Date: Jan 2024
Posts: 216
Actually I have always done alright with BAH hotel rooms. Once got upgraded to an Executive Level 2 bath Suite in the Palmer House in Chicago which had a city view. Am far worse with our corporate travel agent for work getting an accessible room smelling of damp due to the Wet Room.
Last edited by lounge_junkie; Jan 4, 2025 at 4:35 am Reason: clarity


