BA ANNOUNCEMENT - BA to move to a spend based Tier Point system From 1st April 2025
#721




Join Date: Aug 2013
Programs: BAEC Gold, IHG Spire Elite
Posts: 1,781
We’ve known has been coming but it doesn’t make it less painful nor it has arrived.
for me it’s time to stop the status game. I future I’ll do my three or four leisure trips to the USA with whoever is cheapest and because I usually book business I’ll still enjoy fast track security and a lounge. In Europe I’ll also go with the cheapest and do without the benefits I’d normally enjoy.
im definitely one of the golds that BA will be keen to demote. Will they be surprised with how many leave them altogether? Somehow I think they might be. Corporates might be where the high yield is but they are definitely risking a lot of discretionary personal spend from reasonably well off people.
I’m sure they know what they’re doing though.
for me it’s time to stop the status game. I future I’ll do my three or four leisure trips to the USA with whoever is cheapest and because I usually book business I’ll still enjoy fast track security and a lounge. In Europe I’ll also go with the cheapest and do without the benefits I’d normally enjoy.
im definitely one of the golds that BA will be keen to demote. Will they be surprised with how many leave them altogether? Somehow I think they might be. Corporates might be where the high yield is but they are definitely risking a lot of discretionary personal spend from reasonably well off people.
I’m sure they know what they’re doing though.
#722


Join Date: Feb 2016
Posts: 1,453
Have just been doing some back if the fag packet calculations for gold based on the self funded traveller.
Someone on a Ł150k salary with a c5% pension contribution would earn the following after deductions:
rUK: Ł86,784
Scotland: Ł81,048
If realistically Gold will take a 25k spend BA are wanting 25-30% of the top 1%'s net pay to be gold.
Likewise getting silver will take a hefty chunk out of someone earning 75k & Bronze earning 50k.
Loyalty schemes have to have an air of being obtainable for them to work. Who is really going to think the value of Bronze is worth anything now.
BA have essentially said that the first 9k of spend (because that's what silver really costs) is worthless in terms of loyalty.
The self funded point is important because BA in their great wisdom have timed the introduction of the new scheme with the addition of VAT on private school fees and the increase to employer national insurance contributions.
So pockets of desirable individuals and big corporates will be feeling the squeeze.
I do wonder where the spend per level came from as am sure a big proportion of the UK based BAEC are not in the 1% of earners.
Someone on a Ł150k salary with a c5% pension contribution would earn the following after deductions:
rUK: Ł86,784
Scotland: Ł81,048
If realistically Gold will take a 25k spend BA are wanting 25-30% of the top 1%'s net pay to be gold.
Likewise getting silver will take a hefty chunk out of someone earning 75k & Bronze earning 50k.
Loyalty schemes have to have an air of being obtainable for them to work. Who is really going to think the value of Bronze is worth anything now.
BA have essentially said that the first 9k of spend (because that's what silver really costs) is worthless in terms of loyalty.
The self funded point is important because BA in their great wisdom have timed the introduction of the new scheme with the addition of VAT on private school fees and the increase to employer national insurance contributions.
So pockets of desirable individuals and big corporates will be feeling the squeeze.
I do wonder where the spend per level came from as am sure a big proportion of the UK based BAEC are not in the 1% of earners.
#723
FlyerTalk Posting Legend and Ambassador: The British Airways Club




Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Leeds, UK
Programs: BA GGL/CCR, HH Diamond
Posts: 48,310
#725


Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: London
Programs: BA GGL / Concorde Room
Posts: 526
#726
FlyerTalk Evangelist


Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: From ORK, live LCY
Programs: BA Silver, M&M*G, HH Gold, ABP, Seigneur des Horaires des Mucci
Posts: 14,908
The absolute lies people will sink to in order to try and present their decision, made by the beancounters, as being what people asked for will never cease to amaze. Pay more money to get the same status previously held? Yeah, that's what we all wanted, Colm!
I should probably thank BA for getting this out now- I was looking at retaining Silver next year and accordingly the appropriate bookings to get me there, but I won't be bothering now. I might (note: might) still book. It'll be in ET rather than CE if I do though and easyJet will be getting wider consideration if it's Euroflyer.
I will enjoy my last year of Silver. Avios will keep me around with BA until they too are wrecked by dynamic pricing.
I should probably thank BA for getting this out now- I was looking at retaining Silver next year and accordingly the appropriate bookings to get me there, but I won't be bothering now. I might (note: might) still book. It'll be in ET rather than CE if I do though and easyJet will be getting wider consideration if it's Euroflyer.
I will enjoy my last year of Silver. Avios will keep me around with BA until they too are wrecked by dynamic pricing.
A one world round the world ticket, visiting 5 continents, in D class (business).
Putting the anger aside for one minute, I would be genuinely curious to know the strategy driving this decision. BA would have been well aware that this news would go down like a bag of sick in places such as Flyertalk. But there must be some rationale driving it. BA must surely believe the airline will be better off as a result of these changes, otherwise why would they do it?
What are they trying to achieve? What is the problem they think this move will solve?
What are they trying to achieve? What is the problem they think this move will solve?
#727
FlyerTalk Posting Legend and Ambassador: The British Airways Club




Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Leeds, UK
Programs: BA GGL/CCR, HH Diamond
Posts: 48,310
#728
formerly JackDann


Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: Northern Ireland
Posts: 2,251
My few observations:
+ quite a bit of “the level setting should just be where I’d qualify” going on
+ I think BA possess the data to know what each gold makes them, and who’d they want to keep
+ whilst FT may be frequent flyer, the basis of this board is to make status for lowest possible cost, I understand why people are upset. I understand BAs view point
+ I see some people are aghast that their 2500 spend isn’t going to give them gold anymore; sorry, but you’re not profitable customers (and you’re not the marginal customer either)
I remember back in the 90s and early 2000s, BA Gold was super elusive (at least from a teenager in the 90s). I think they’re just taking it back there, and if one will be a gold going forward, it will be nice.
I’d have had some years where I’d easily have made gold on these rates, but as a mainly leisure traveller these days cannot do two programmes for the little work travel I have. I’d be ok with this but don’t have skin in the game.
I’m curious to know what happens with the corporate contracts where eg someone pays x due to corporate discount however actual cost is y, and at which point they get credited. Previously people seem to have said y mattered when calculating CIV.
+ quite a bit of “the level setting should just be where I’d qualify” going on
+ I think BA possess the data to know what each gold makes them, and who’d they want to keep
+ whilst FT may be frequent flyer, the basis of this board is to make status for lowest possible cost, I understand why people are upset. I understand BAs view point
+ I see some people are aghast that their 2500 spend isn’t going to give them gold anymore; sorry, but you’re not profitable customers (and you’re not the marginal customer either)
I remember back in the 90s and early 2000s, BA Gold was super elusive (at least from a teenager in the 90s). I think they’re just taking it back there, and if one will be a gold going forward, it will be nice.
I’d have had some years where I’d easily have made gold on these rates, but as a mainly leisure traveller these days cannot do two programmes for the little work travel I have. I’d be ok with this but don’t have skin in the game.
I’m curious to know what happens with the corporate contracts where eg someone pays x due to corporate discount however actual cost is y, and at which point they get credited. Previously people seem to have said y mattered when calculating CIV.
BUT… Even at that spend, I really didn’t think the benefits were that mind blowing and never went out of my way to achieve it again. Infact, I done the opposite and let my TP’s run down.
#729

Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: London
Programs: BAEC Gold
Posts: 42
I can see the appeal of this change to BA and great if it works out for them. Personally, I think this will push me to spread my travel across airlines/ alliances as well. 13 years of being gold, this change means most years I’d have been silver rather than gold. My current behaviour sees me over- prioritising BA and OW. I can cite several examples when booking a last minute ticket, I’ve chosen a one stop AA & BA option for the same price as direct with another airline for the same or similar fare.
Although this year & probably next year too, would have gotten me gold under the new system, BA Gold is categorically not worth Ł20k to me based on my experience as a gold member for enough time.
If they made gold genuinely more valuable, I may consider it. First wing was a really nice perk, but outside that… if they swapped to cabin upgrades like many US airlines do or anything else particularly high value to me given I fly for work, and have been lucky all my employers to date let me pick how I travel so long as it’s within policy’s & price limits. Most of the great lounges are partner OW lounges not BAs. The new automated disruption handling also doesn’t seem to prioritise golds obviously (although in theory it did). I’ve always had to call up as the was a better option available that i was not auto rebooked onto. Likewise hotel allocation during distribution seems by cabin and status didn’t play a part. As gold, CS picked up quicker but it was hit or miss in the operator if you got good service. I’m minded to try not being loyal to anyone for a bit. I did that with hotels some years ago and haven’t looked back. I’ve found I spend less on hotels after factoring in free nights on points. Maybe it will work with me for airlines too!
Although this year & probably next year too, would have gotten me gold under the new system, BA Gold is categorically not worth Ł20k to me based on my experience as a gold member for enough time.
If they made gold genuinely more valuable, I may consider it. First wing was a really nice perk, but outside that… if they swapped to cabin upgrades like many US airlines do or anything else particularly high value to me given I fly for work, and have been lucky all my employers to date let me pick how I travel so long as it’s within policy’s & price limits. Most of the great lounges are partner OW lounges not BAs. The new automated disruption handling also doesn’t seem to prioritise golds obviously (although in theory it did). I’ve always had to call up as the was a better option available that i was not auto rebooked onto. Likewise hotel allocation during distribution seems by cabin and status didn’t play a part. As gold, CS picked up quicker but it was hit or miss in the operator if you got good service. I’m minded to try not being loyal to anyone for a bit. I did that with hotels some years ago and haven’t looked back. I’ve found I spend less on hotels after factoring in free nights on points. Maybe it will work with me for airlines too!
#730
Moderator: The British Airways Club



Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: TPA/ABZ
Programs: British Airways Gold Guest List for Life
Posts: 14,244
The changes on the site show the updates from earlier this year. You are perhaps confusing the April 2024 changes with the forthcoming April 2025 changes?
#731


Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Brisbane
Programs: BAEC Blue/Bronze, Krisflyer, Qantas
Posts: 519
I feel they've shot themselves in the foot by setting the bar too high for leisure travellers and removing the gamification aspect.
I think they'll be looking to tweak and adjust over time to encourage leisure travellers back to BA
I think they'll be looking to tweak and adjust over time to encourage leisure travellers back to BA
#732



Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: SIN
Programs: A3 *G, BA Gold, QF WP, SK EBG, AF/KL FB Plat, VS Silver, Bonvoy Gold, IHG Gold
Posts: 1,337
So true. Friends in Asia are gobsmacked at how easy gold is. Look at Singapore airlines where top tier status can be earned on J only spend. I knew this time would come. I've certainly spent more than 2k for my gold, but it always struck me as strange it could technically be got for a couple of grand
JAL JMB/JGC can be easier than BA Silver in some instance.
The fact that BA is bucking the trend is puzzling - yes, those TP points should go up, but most BA Golds are earned from flying J anyway. Ironically under the new programme I can dole Ł20k on BA Y and still get gold, which is moving away from how PPS is set up
#734




Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: OSL
Programs: QR Plat | SK Diamond | A3 Gold
Posts: 4,612
Have had BA Gold for the last 7-8 years. Used to be great, with 1A/K and 62/64 on the 747s. Nowadays the benefits vs. Silver are almost non-existent (boarding 1-3 shambles, poorer F lounges, no special seats to choose), BA is consistently MUCH more expensive than alternatives and they operate from the hellhole that is LHR (especially when transferring between terminals - always have a stressful time there).
One nice aspect is op-up’s to F and being able to upgrade for avios. If I was spending Ł20k I’d put that towards almost getting HON, but LH group has destroyed their F product with Allegris.
My short haul flights are all SK (works great as a diamond), unless ex-LHR or HEL, and long haul are almost all premium cabin (try to do paid ones on OneWorld). So the added value of my status is already questionable. I do sometimes like BA onboard when the crew are friendly, but there are other more efficient journeys I’d consider now.
Looking at QRPC, while it’s harder to get Emerald than the current BAEC, it’s a lot easier than the new programme. Avios can also be moved so I don’t end up with yet another new programme.
Already have one J booking on JAL to Japan in early April, and was looking at one with QR in Feb (am 100 TP short of renewing Gold). Question is do I keep these on BA (especially the JAL one as I’d like to use the CX and JL F lounges in LHR and HND for one of the last times)… or do I just move everything over to QR and aim for status there. Probably too early to do so while I still have BA Gold until March (?) 2026.
One nice aspect is op-up’s to F and being able to upgrade for avios. If I was spending Ł20k I’d put that towards almost getting HON, but LH group has destroyed their F product with Allegris.
My short haul flights are all SK (works great as a diamond), unless ex-LHR or HEL, and long haul are almost all premium cabin (try to do paid ones on OneWorld). So the added value of my status is already questionable. I do sometimes like BA onboard when the crew are friendly, but there are other more efficient journeys I’d consider now.
Looking at QRPC, while it’s harder to get Emerald than the current BAEC, it’s a lot easier than the new programme. Avios can also be moved so I don’t end up with yet another new programme.
Already have one J booking on JAL to Japan in early April, and was looking at one with QR in Feb (am 100 TP short of renewing Gold). Question is do I keep these on BA (especially the JAL one as I’d like to use the CX and JL F lounges in LHR and HND for one of the last times)… or do I just move everything over to QR and aim for status there. Probably too early to do so while I still have BA Gold until March (?) 2026.


