Community
Wiki Posts
Search

SFO or SJC?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 13, 2010 | 8:52 pm
  #1  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Dallas, TX
Programs: AA Gold 1MM, SPG Gold, HHonors Gold
Posts: 660
SFO or SJC?

Booking a flight to DFW from San Francisco and there are good options from both SFO & SJC. We'll primarily be in San Francisco while we visit so it would seem that SFO would be the logical choice but with SJC so close I thought I'd consider that airport too.

If it matters, we'll be dropping a rental car off and will be flying AA. I saw the posts on the new terminal but not sure I'd drive to SJC just for a new terminal. I'm more looking for opinions on which one is easier to get to, drop off the rental car, better overall experience, etc.

(If there's already a thread on this topic, please point me to it...I did some searches but came up empty).
jw713 is offline  
Old Aug 13, 2010 | 10:40 pm
  #2  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
20 Countries Visited
3M
Conversation Starter
25 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Over the Bay Bridge, CA
Programs: Jumbo mas
Posts: 42,597
SFO is much closer. And a very pleasant airport. On your return, if you get there early, just take the train (from the rental car dropoff) to walk around the beautiful Int'l terminal before the short walk over to T-3 for your AA flight.
Eastbay1K is online now  
Old Aug 13, 2010 | 11:21 pm
  #3  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
2M
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Democratic People's Republic of the UK
Programs: Lifetime Gold, Global Entry, Hertz PC, and my wallet
Posts: 21,912
SFO - SJC is still the poor relation imho.
Silver Fox is offline  
Old Aug 13, 2010 | 11:24 pm
  #4  
Moderator: Hilton Honors, Practical Travel Safety Issues, Information Desk & San Francisco
10 Countries Visited
All eyes on you!
25 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: San Francisco CA
Programs: UA, Hilton, Priceline, AirBnB
Posts: 11,319
SJC Isn't THAT close

From SF proper it's an hour's drive; little less to SFO.
The only consideration in favor of SJC is that flights seldom get delayed at SJC for fog.
squeakr is offline  
Old Aug 15, 2010 | 9:57 am
  #5  
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: SFO
Programs: UA 1P, AA Gold, SPG Gold, FPC Plat, Marriott Gold
Posts: 113
Originally Posted by jw713
Booking a flight to DFW from San Francisco and there are good options from both SFO & SJC. We'll primarily be in San Francisco while we visit so it would seem that SFO would be the logical choice but with SJC so close I thought I'd consider that airport too.

If it matters, we'll be dropping a rental car off and will be flying AA. I saw the posts on the new terminal but not sure I'd drive to SJC just for a new terminal. I'm more looking for opinions on which one is easier to get to, drop off the rental car, better overall experience, etc.

(If there's already a thread on this topic, please point me to it...I did some searches but came up empty).
The new SJC terminal isn't worth going out of your way to see IMO... Since SFO will be 45m-1.5h closer depending on when you go and the restaurants are better, I think you have your answer.

The only advantages I can see for SJC are that it is a smaller airport (depending on the airline taxiing could be a lot quicker for example), and it won't get fogged some times of the year in like SFO, which limits the rate of flights in and can cause some backup
balderdash is offline  
Old Aug 15, 2010 | 7:03 pm
  #6  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Dallas, TX
Programs: AA Gold 1MM, SPG Gold, HHonors Gold
Posts: 660
I think I should've worded my first post differently to say "I wouldn't drive to SJC just for a new terminal."

This will be an award flight (booked through a partner) so it may come down to availability. Right now it looks like SJC has more/better options so I'll need to see if it's worth flying at 2pm vs. 9am for SJC vs. SFO. We'd rather fly out later and the 2pm would give us more time, although I need to factor in the hour it will take to get there.
jw713 is offline  
Old Aug 15, 2010 | 9:29 pm
  #7  
In memoriam
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 4,020
Oakland Airport is actually closer to downtown SF than is SFO.

Certainly a whole lot closer than SJC.
biggestbopper is offline  
Old Aug 16, 2010 | 3:16 pm
  #8  
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: SFO/SJC
Programs: UA Premier, SWA Rapid Rewards, Alaska Air Mileage Plan, AAdvantage, CX Marco Polo
Posts: 544
Originally Posted by balderdash
The new SJC terminal isn't worth going out of your way to see IMO... Since SFO will be 45m-1.5h closer depending on when you go and the restaurants are better, I think you have your answer.

The only advantages I can see for SJC are that it is a smaller airport (depending on the airline taxiing could be a lot quicker for example), and it won't get fogged some times of the year in like SFO, which limits the rate of flights in and can cause some backup
If you're going to be spending most of your time in Silicon Valley, Santa Clara County/southern Alameda County, SJC makes a lot more sense geographically. If you're going to be up in SF, then SFO is your logical choice. Apart from that, yes, SFO has more fog related delays, though.
silverkris168 is offline  
Old Aug 16, 2010 | 5:59 pm
  #9  
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
All eyes on you!
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: La Jolla, California
Programs: KrisFlyer Gold, SWA CP
Posts: 1,132
Originally Posted by biggestbopper
Oakland Airport is actually closer to downtown SF than is SFO.

Certainly a whole lot closer than SJC.
I second this. OAK is much better for SF than SJC or SFO. SJC, in reality, is nowhere near SF. Neither is SFO, but that is a different discussion. Aside from renting car and driving it, I'm not even sure how to get to SF from SJC. The only downside to OAK is the hostile bus drivers on the BART bus. And the Coliseum BART station leaves much to be desired.

OAK is much less prone to the delays that plague SFO. And the BART ride is much, much shorter. You just have to endure that bus .......
mike_la_jolla is offline  
Old Aug 16, 2010 | 6:38 pm
  #10  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
20 Countries Visited
3M
Conversation Starter
25 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Over the Bay Bridge, CA
Programs: Jumbo mas
Posts: 42,597
My assumption is that the OP is flying AA, which means OAK isn't an option.
Eastbay1K is online now  
Old Aug 16, 2010 | 8:16 pm
  #11  
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Washington, DC USA
Programs: UA; Amtrak
Posts: 2,002
Originally Posted by mike_la_jolla
Aside from renting car and driving it, I'm not even sure how to get to SF from SJC.
It is a sign of how overlooked SJC is when it does not even rate a mention on VTA's list of "popular destinations" (http://www.vta.org/schedules/popular_destinations.html )— but then, this is a breathtakingly bad website for an agency serving Silicon Valley. There is a free shuttle (route 10) that connects SJC to the Santa Clara CalTrain station, or if you really had time to kill you could get off at the Metro/Airport light rail stop and take the light rail to San Jose Diridon. Not nearly as easy a connection as SFO or OAK, but still quite possible using transit.
choster is offline  
Old Aug 16, 2010 | 8:42 pm
  #12  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
20 Countries Visited
3M
Conversation Starter
25 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Over the Bay Bridge, CA
Programs: Jumbo mas
Posts: 42,597
Originally Posted by choster
It is a sign of how overlooked SJC is when it does not even rate a mention on VTA's list of "popular destinations"
VTA was almost named SCAT. What do you expect? It wasn't until an article appeared in the paper that the Board of Supervisors apparently realized that this was not the best name for a rail system.
Eastbay1K is online now  
Old Aug 16, 2010 | 9:33 pm
  #13  
Moderator: Luxury Hotels and FlyerTalk Evangelist
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Palo Alto, California,USA
Posts: 18,252
Originally Posted by mike_la_jolla
I second this. OAK is much better for SF than SJC or SFO. SJC, in reality, is nowhere near SF. Neither is SFO, but that is a different discussion. Aside from renting car and driving it, I'm not even sure how to get to SF from SJC. The only downside to OAK is the hostile bus drivers on the BART bus. And the Coliseum BART station leaves much to be desired.

OAK is much less prone to the delays that plague SFO. And the BART ride is much, much shorter. You just have to endure that bus .......
If only OAK wasn't, uh, in Oakland!
RichardInSF is offline  
Old Aug 16, 2010 | 10:20 pm
  #14  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
20 Countries Visited
1M
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Portland
Posts: 11,689
Originally Posted by mike_la_jolla
I second this. OAK is much better for SF than SJC or SFO. SJC, in reality, is nowhere near SF. Neither is SFO, but that is a different discussion. Aside from renting car and driving it, I'm not even sure how to get to SF from SJC. The only downside to OAK is the hostile bus drivers on the BART bus. And the Coliseum BART station leaves much to be desired.

OAK is much less prone to the delays that plague SFO. And the BART ride is much, much shorter. You just have to endure that bus .......
I disagree with this advice. The OP is renting a car, but even if the OP were taking Bart, SFO is both easier (with Bart in the terminal) and nicer.

As to SJC, I don't know the answer to this, but are rental cars in the short term garage across from the terminal? If so, I think it's going to be a good option for the OP. It's a longer drive than SFO (30+ minutes more) but you'll save some time renting and returning the car. Add better flight times to that and I would probably pick SJC.
rjque is offline  
Old Aug 17, 2010 | 4:09 am
  #15  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
1M
40 Countries Visited
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: SF CA USA. I love large faceless corporations. And they cherish me in return (sometimes). ;)
Programs: UA Premier Gold/disappointed 1MM, HH Gold, IHG Plat, MB lifetime Gold, BW Diam Sel
Posts: 17,819
Originally Posted by mike_la_jolla
I second this. OAK is much better for SF than SJC or SFO. SJC, in reality, is nowhere near SF. Neither is SFO, but that is a different discussion....
Are you claiming that SFO is "nowhere near SF?"

In fact, the driving distance (via US Hwy 101) from SFO to downtown SF is only about 13 miles.

The driving distance (again via US 101) between SJC & SFO (i.e., between these 2 airports) is approx. 34 miles.

And the driving distance (via I-880 & I-80/Bay Bridge) from OAK to downtown SF is ~21 miles.

Driving times on all of these routes are quite variable, as all are heavily traveled highways & subject to congestion during peak commute times (& other times ).

All this info is readily available from online (and/or paper) maps....
KathyWdrf is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.