Current state of DOH Hamad International Airport
#16
Join Date: Jan 2023
Location: London
Programs: BA Gold, ALL Diamond
Posts: 4
I went through DOH yesterday (1st March) in J, and we had a business class bus.
#17
Join Date: Dec 2002
Programs: QR Plat
Posts: 2,435
Just ot be clear. There is a seperate call for J pax to remain and there is a seperate bus they wish to put J pax in. What I'm getting at is that this bus is never exclusive to J pax, it always gets rammed full of Y pax showing up late to the gate, i.e. not a very "exclusive" boarding experience for J pax.
-A
#18
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Johannesburg
Programs: QRPC Plat, Hyatt Globalist, Hilton Diamond, IHg Diamond Amb, Sixt Diamond, Avis Pres, AmexCenturion
Posts: 488
Eventually the thrid bus departed the terminal 15 mins before the scheduled departed arriving just before scheduled departure time. The crew tried to scold the pax for being late.... I was feeing particularly grumpy, it wasnt their best strategy.
Given the current state of Hamad, they need more busses, and they need to commit to timelines for the D/E gates opening - its easier to be sympathetic when there is a horizon. They also need to also start publicising plans and timelines for the western concourse.
#19
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 842
The extension is due to open by late 2025, there were announcements by the former CEO on the timelines. The construction is also affecting some previously operational contact stands, these start coming back early 2025. There are also notices about some other temporary closures, such as the contact stands on the north side of the Orchard being out of use until mid-March.
Once the extension opens, that is about a 50% increase in available passenger loading bridges.
Right now the existing gates are not used efficiently. Many flights in the afternoon and early evening banks depart from remote stands even though passenger loading bridges are available. Prior to COVID QR was spreading out their schedules in the two main banks and building up the other two smaller connection banks. As an example, many flights to Europe departed between 0600 and 0700, some arrivals from the same direction (Europe and North America) arrived after these flights departed, this allowed the use of the same stand in the same bank without towing. Once COVID hit and flights were reduced, QR had to compact the schedules to keep connections viable. After the recovery and as flights increased they piled on a lot at the two main connection banks in a shorter window compared to the pre-COVID schedules.
QR could also use aircraft towing more to utilize the gates better, there are cons to increasing the use of aircraft towing such as increased wear and tear (towing is stressful to the landing gear) and the need for more skilled staff (qualified technicians). I think QR should re-asses those cons now, increasing the use of the contact gates and spreading out the schedules will not only improve the passenger experience and reduce mis-connects/delays but also increase duty free revenues.
Once the extension opens, that is about a 50% increase in available passenger loading bridges.
Right now the existing gates are not used efficiently. Many flights in the afternoon and early evening banks depart from remote stands even though passenger loading bridges are available. Prior to COVID QR was spreading out their schedules in the two main banks and building up the other two smaller connection banks. As an example, many flights to Europe departed between 0600 and 0700, some arrivals from the same direction (Europe and North America) arrived after these flights departed, this allowed the use of the same stand in the same bank without towing. Once COVID hit and flights were reduced, QR had to compact the schedules to keep connections viable. After the recovery and as flights increased they piled on a lot at the two main connection banks in a shorter window compared to the pre-COVID schedules.
QR could also use aircraft towing more to utilize the gates better, there are cons to increasing the use of aircraft towing such as increased wear and tear (towing is stressful to the landing gear) and the need for more skilled staff (qualified technicians). I think QR should re-asses those cons now, increasing the use of the contact gates and spreading out the schedules will not only improve the passenger experience and reduce mis-connects/delays but also increase duty free revenues.
#20
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Johannesburg
Programs: QRPC Plat, Hyatt Globalist, Hilton Diamond, IHg Diamond Amb, Sixt Diamond, Avis Pres, AmexCenturion
Posts: 488
Given the vast resources of the state of Qatar that is almost unacceptable. I am starting to think about connecting in other countries to avoid DOH, despite thinking QR onboard is better than anyone else
#21
Join Date: Apr 2015
Programs: Some
Posts: 5,255
The extension is due to open by late 2025, there were announcements by the former CEO on the timelines. The construction is also affecting some previously operational contact stands, these start coming back early 2025. There are also notices about some other temporary closures, such as the contact stands on the north side of the Orchard being out of use until mid-March.
Once the extension opens, that is about a 50% increase in available passenger loading bridges.
Right now the existing gates are not used efficiently. Many flights in the afternoon and early evening banks depart from remote stands even though passenger loading bridges are available. Prior to COVID QR was spreading out their schedules in the two main banks and building up the other two smaller connection banks. As an example, many flights to Europe departed between 0600 and 0700, some arrivals from the same direction (Europe and North America) arrived after these flights departed, this allowed the use of the same stand in the same bank without towing. Once COVID hit and flights were reduced, QR had to compact the schedules to keep connections viable. After the recovery and as flights increased they piled on a lot at the two main connection banks in a shorter window compared to the pre-COVID schedules.
QR could also use aircraft towing more to utilize the gates better, there are cons to increasing the use of aircraft towing such as increased wear and tear (towing is stressful to the landing gear) and the need for more skilled staff (qualified technicians). I think QR should re-asses those cons now, increasing the use of the contact gates and spreading out the schedules will not only improve the passenger experience and reduce mis-connects/delays but also increase duty free revenues.
Once the extension opens, that is about a 50% increase in available passenger loading bridges.
Right now the existing gates are not used efficiently. Many flights in the afternoon and early evening banks depart from remote stands even though passenger loading bridges are available. Prior to COVID QR was spreading out their schedules in the two main banks and building up the other two smaller connection banks. As an example, many flights to Europe departed between 0600 and 0700, some arrivals from the same direction (Europe and North America) arrived after these flights departed, this allowed the use of the same stand in the same bank without towing. Once COVID hit and flights were reduced, QR had to compact the schedules to keep connections viable. After the recovery and as flights increased they piled on a lot at the two main connection banks in a shorter window compared to the pre-COVID schedules.
QR could also use aircraft towing more to utilize the gates better, there are cons to increasing the use of aircraft towing such as increased wear and tear (towing is stressful to the landing gear) and the need for more skilled staff (qualified technicians). I think QR should re-asses those cons now, increasing the use of the contact gates and spreading out the schedules will not only improve the passenger experience and reduce mis-connects/delays but also increase duty free revenues.
#22
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 842
I agree thought that if you have better options its a good time to use them for the next couple years and wait out the construction and the vast number of aircraft with older or non-QR seating.
#23
Join Date: Mar 2019
Programs: BAEC Gold, IHG Platinum Ambassador
Posts: 26
With the horrible airport experience and the dropping quality onboard service, I don't see myself a frequent QR flyer anymore...
#24
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: London
Programs: Hilton, IHG - BA, GA, LH, QR, SV, TK
Posts: 17,008
Pretty intensive towing operations involving some long and complex routes would be needed rationalise demand for contact gates. We get a similar dilemma at airports with mixes of domestic//international arrivals/departures .... most are happy to shove the inconvenience towards passengers and buses where a domestic inbound becomes an international departure, rather than take on the significant costs of towing between gates or between remote stands and gates.
Neither airports nor airlines would welcome towing where it's not an operational necessity.
I was seated next to a somewhat peed-off official from a ministry not directly involved with QR or HIA. I think he got a very special bus to the aircraft, but nonetheless he'd clearly got a bee in his bonnet about the airport expansion. In our conversation he expressed concern about the billions being invested in airline and airport with a very unclear return on that investment and the benefits that might accrue to Qatar. It seems unlikely that's a unique view.
Neither airports nor airlines would welcome towing where it's not an operational necessity.
I was seated next to a somewhat peed-off official from a ministry not directly involved with QR or HIA. I think he got a very special bus to the aircraft, but nonetheless he'd clearly got a bee in his bonnet about the airport expansion. In our conversation he expressed concern about the billions being invested in airline and airport with a very unclear return on that investment and the benefits that might accrue to Qatar. It seems unlikely that's a unique view.
#25
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: NYC, FLL
Programs: UA PP 1MM, Marriott Bonvoy LTTE, BA Gold
Posts: 6,324
QR95 DOH-ZRH today, dedicated business bus; no economy cramming as suggested in this thread.
I do agree, however, that waiting to board as a J passenger can be a bit stressful if you don’t know the drill. Lots of (what appeared to be American & Canadian) J pax trying to board at all times of the bus gate process, but then told to hold while economy boards in an area that then became a zoo of economy pax for the gate next door.
Simple, clear announcements would fix this.
I do agree, however, that waiting to board as a J passenger can be a bit stressful if you don’t know the drill. Lots of (what appeared to be American & Canadian) J pax trying to board at all times of the bus gate process, but then told to hold while economy boards in an area that then became a zoo of economy pax for the gate next door.
Simple, clear announcements would fix this.
#26
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Doha, Qatar
Programs: QR Gold
Posts: 772
The extension is due to open by late 2025, there were announcements by the former CEO on the timelines. The construction is also affecting some previously operational contact stands, these start coming back early 2025. There are also notices about some other temporary closures, such as the contact stands on the north side of the Orchard being out of use until mid-March.
Once the extension opens, that is about a 50% increase in available passenger loading bridges.
Right now the existing gates are not used efficiently. Many flights in the afternoon and early evening banks depart from remote stands even though passenger loading bridges are available. Prior to COVID QR was spreading out their schedules in the two main banks and building up the other two smaller connection banks. As an example, many flights to Europe departed between 0600 and 0700, some arrivals from the same direction (Europe and North America) arrived after these flights departed, this allowed the use of the same stand in the same bank without towing. Once COVID hit and flights were reduced, QR had to compact the schedules to keep connections viable. After the recovery and as flights increased they piled on a lot at the two main connection banks in a shorter window compared to the pre-COVID schedules.
QR could also use aircraft towing more to utilize the gates better, there are cons to increasing the use of aircraft towing such as increased wear and tear (towing is stressful to the landing gear) and the need for more skilled staff (qualified technicians). I think QR should re-asses those cons now, increasing the use of the contact gates and spreading out the schedules will not only improve the passenger experience and reduce mis-connects/delays but also increase duty free revenues.
Once the extension opens, that is about a 50% increase in available passenger loading bridges.
Right now the existing gates are not used efficiently. Many flights in the afternoon and early evening banks depart from remote stands even though passenger loading bridges are available. Prior to COVID QR was spreading out their schedules in the two main banks and building up the other two smaller connection banks. As an example, many flights to Europe departed between 0600 and 0700, some arrivals from the same direction (Europe and North America) arrived after these flights departed, this allowed the use of the same stand in the same bank without towing. Once COVID hit and flights were reduced, QR had to compact the schedules to keep connections viable. After the recovery and as flights increased they piled on a lot at the two main connection banks in a shorter window compared to the pre-COVID schedules.
QR could also use aircraft towing more to utilize the gates better, there are cons to increasing the use of aircraft towing such as increased wear and tear (towing is stressful to the landing gear) and the need for more skilled staff (qualified technicians). I think QR should re-asses those cons now, increasing the use of the contact gates and spreading out the schedules will not only improve the passenger experience and reduce mis-connects/delays but also increase duty free revenues.
I also think pilots park in remote stands to reduce their working hours (along with Cabin crew) since they can just literally park 20 seconds after landing and then that's it. Getting towed to a gate and then going back to the parking bay will increase their working hours. Perhaps that could be a reason why they are using this much.
#27
Join Date: Dec 2002
Programs: QR Plat
Posts: 2,435
I agree.
I also think pilots park in remote stands to reduce their working hours (along with Cabin crew) since they can just literally park 20 seconds after landing and then that's it. Getting towed to a gate and then going back to the parking bay will increase their working hours. Perhaps that could be a reason why they are using this much.
I also think pilots park in remote stands to reduce their working hours (along with Cabin crew) since they can just literally park 20 seconds after landing and then that's it. Getting towed to a gate and then going back to the parking bay will increase their working hours. Perhaps that could be a reason why they are using this much.
-A
#28
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: London
Programs: Hilton, IHG - BA, GA, LH, QR, SV, TK
Posts: 17,008
I agree.
I also think pilots park in remote stands to reduce their working hours (along with Cabin crew) since they can just literally park 20 seconds after landing and then that's it. Getting towed to a gate and then going back to the parking bay will increase their working hours. Perhaps that could be a reason why they are using this much.
I also think pilots park in remote stands to reduce their working hours (along with Cabin crew) since they can just literally park 20 seconds after landing and then that's it. Getting towed to a gate and then going back to the parking bay will increase their working hours. Perhaps that could be a reason why they are using this much.
And given the competitive parking i see around town, i reckon its a good idea the whole thing is controlled by the airport
#29
Join Date: May 2020
Location: DXB and JNB
Programs: EK Plat; QR Gold
Posts: 507
”I see one! That b****y BA guy is about to take it! More thrust! More thrust!”
#30
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: MEL
Programs: DL, QF, QR Gold, MR Lifetime Gold
Posts: 7,003
I like to think that logistically, they've thought about the jetbridge / remote parking and have decided to make best use of their infrastructure. (I'm not convinced, but have no info / data to support it.)
The idea of a separate J bus is just a nightmare and I disliked it the few times I've used it as a J pax - I would have preferred to board and have a drink instead of waiting in the terminal. That is just an unnecessary complication. Do away with the premium buses and maybe manage the bus traffic better to (a) minimise the time pax spend waiting for a bus, (b) minimise the bus travel time, and (c) eliminate the confusion around boarding the actual bus (bus doors open / not, wait by the terminal door, now go, but wait, not yet... all that dance)
The idea of a separate J bus is just a nightmare and I disliked it the few times I've used it as a J pax - I would have preferred to board and have a drink instead of waiting in the terminal. That is just an unnecessary complication. Do away with the premium buses and maybe manage the bus traffic better to (a) minimise the time pax spend waiting for a bus, (b) minimise the bus travel time, and (c) eliminate the confusion around boarding the actual bus (bus doors open / not, wait by the terminal door, now go, but wait, not yet... all that dance)