"So why did you ring me then?"
#1
Original Poster
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: SYD
Programs: DJ, QF, SPG, Hilton
Posts: 2,984
"So why did you ring me then?"
Just want to share a recent experience with the QFF call centre...
(Not word by word reflection...)
QFF: Qantas Airways
Me: I'm having trouble with redeeming some points. The web site won't take my billing address. It keeps saying the address must be 2 and 40 characters long.'
QFF: The address can only contain numbers and letters.
Me: How should I enter an apartment address? Something like 2<slash>45 Main Street?
QFF: Unit 2 45 Main Street
Me: So 'unit 2', space, '45 Main street'
QFF: Yes, the address can only take numbers and letters
Me: Oh OK, the error message is a bit misleading that's all
QFF: So why did you ring me then?
Me: OK, thanks for all your help.
<I hung up>
To say her tone from the get-go was 'cold' would be generous. I probably would have worked around the error if I was less tired that night, but it just led me down the wrong path.
Anyway, I don't know if I'm over-reacting, but I was rather annoyed with this manner. I've never dealt with someone from a Call Centre like that before.
Yes, I've sent this feedback to QF, and asked them to review the recording. (I don't know if they record every phone call...)
I haven't heard back from them yet. Interestingly, previous occasions where I used that web site form to provide feedback, positive or negative, I'd hear back the next working day (often the next working day morning).
P.S. I haven't asked for any compensation - just some training for staff so this doesn't happen again.
(Not word by word reflection...)
QFF: Qantas Airways
Me: I'm having trouble with redeeming some points. The web site won't take my billing address. It keeps saying the address must be 2 and 40 characters long.'
QFF: The address can only contain numbers and letters.
Me: How should I enter an apartment address? Something like 2<slash>45 Main Street?
QFF: Unit 2 45 Main Street
Me: So 'unit 2', space, '45 Main street'
QFF: Yes, the address can only take numbers and letters
Me: Oh OK, the error message is a bit misleading that's all
QFF: So why did you ring me then?
Me: OK, thanks for all your help.
<I hung up>
To say her tone from the get-go was 'cold' would be generous. I probably would have worked around the error if I was less tired that night, but it just led me down the wrong path.
Anyway, I don't know if I'm over-reacting, but I was rather annoyed with this manner. I've never dealt with someone from a Call Centre like that before.
Yes, I've sent this feedback to QF, and asked them to review the recording. (I don't know if they record every phone call...)
I haven't heard back from them yet. Interestingly, previous occasions where I used that web site form to provide feedback, positive or negative, I'd hear back the next working day (often the next working day morning).
P.S. I haven't asked for any compensation - just some training for staff so this doesn't happen again.
#2
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Melbourne
Programs: ►QFWP/LTG►VA WP►HyattExpl.►HiltonGold►ALL Silver
Posts: 21,997
Some get flagged for review as would be prompted by your feedback, others targeted by an algorithmic tonal analysis, others at random, etc ...
#3
#4
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 5,984
#6
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: SYD
Programs: QF WP/LTG | UA P
Posts: 13,532
If this gives you the sh!ts, then try entering the advance passenger information for travel to the USA. It seems to specialise in not accepting anything that I'm inputting. But maybe it doesn't believe me!
#7
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Sydney
Posts: 5,769
I just went to book some flights got to put in the amex number then the prompter went to ask about carbon neutral and then jsut went round and round for about 10 mins i refreshed and it kept going back to the payment page which was strange but the carbon neutral kept going round and round so I called the res line
this rude b---h told me that I had timed out
yes I had I think but it was because the website wasnt working properly
then by the time I logged out and back again the seats were gone
those females need a kick up the you know what!
what she should have done was book the flights for me and not charge the booking fee
but they put everything down to user error they dont realise that a lot of us know more than them.
this rude b---h told me that I had timed out
yes I had I think but it was because the website wasnt working properly
then by the time I logged out and back again the seats were gone
those females need a kick up the you know what!
what she should have done was book the flights for me and not charge the booking fee
but they put everything down to user error they dont realise that a lot of us know more than them.
#8
Original Poster
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: SYD
Programs: DJ, QF, SPG, Hilton
Posts: 2,984
Originally Posted by og
If this gives you the sh!ts, then try entering the advance passenger information for travel to the USA. It seems to specialise in not accepting anything that I'm inputting. But maybe it doesn't believe me!
#9
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Melbourne
Programs: ►QFWP/LTG►VA WP►HyattExpl.►HiltonGold►ALL Silver
Posts: 21,997
In the end I shortened the "Destination Address Street No. and Name"
from:
'Doubletree Hotel LAX 1985 East Grand Ave'
to
'Doubletree hotel lax'
and it went through OK.
#10
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Sydney, AU.
Programs: QF. UA. Avis. AMEX.
Posts: 1,558
For the advanced PAX information just skip this and do it directly https://esta.cbp.dhs.gov
Anyway I think poor res needs to have some slack cut for them as they are not responsible for the website and I don't think it is really fare to blame them for something which they probably know little about.
The reason for the lack of special characters is because some characters such as ? / ' " & ! have special meaning and can result in the compromise of the computer system if not handled correctly by the website. As a result these characters have been blocked. There are methods for enabling these characters safely however they also come with quite a high price tag and for the life of me I cannot see a business case which says that the lack of special character support is costing QF money. Personally I think the 1/2 million to a million dollars QF would need to spend to enable special characters is better spent bringing back hot breakfasts on cityflyer in economy.
Anyway I think poor res needs to have some slack cut for them as they are not responsible for the website and I don't think it is really fare to blame them for something which they probably know little about.
The reason for the lack of special characters is because some characters such as ? / ' " & ! have special meaning and can result in the compromise of the computer system if not handled correctly by the website. As a result these characters have been blocked. There are methods for enabling these characters safely however they also come with quite a high price tag and for the life of me I cannot see a business case which says that the lack of special character support is costing QF money. Personally I think the 1/2 million to a million dollars QF would need to spend to enable special characters is better spent bringing back hot breakfasts on cityflyer in economy.
#11
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: SYD
Programs: QF WP/LTG | UA P
Posts: 13,532
This may be the case, but it (IIRC) is not explained before you start inputting information. You only discover that there are problems after it is rejected. Therefore, QF need to credit the punters with a little more intelligence and set out the rules before they do what the web site asks. This will cause a reduction in crankyness and beer consumption since we will spend less time thumping the keyboard (and desk) when things don't work.
#14
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Melbourne
Programs: ►QFWP/LTG►VA WP►HyattExpl.►HiltonGold►ALL Silver
Posts: 21,997
#15
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: LON
Programs: QF Plat & LTG, VA Plat
Posts: 1,435
UK call centres (even if they are mostly outsourced to India) have been highly advanced ahead of Australia for years... From over 5 years ago most corporates were employing voice recognition technology to automate calls - I was always amused orally entering my bill numbers and CC number when I could have just used the phone keypad.
Tagging calls based on conversation keywords is pretty cool. Unfortunately the biggest problem in call centres is the staff turnover, so despite training and retraining, you will still have a bunch of sub-optimal operators.
EDIT: sorry this has nothing to do with QF really...
Tagging calls based on conversation keywords is pretty cool. Unfortunately the biggest problem in call centres is the staff turnover, so despite training and retraining, you will still have a bunch of sub-optimal operators.
EDIT: sorry this has nothing to do with QF really...