Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Miles&Points > Airlines and Mileage Programs > Qantas | Frequent Flyer
Reload this Page >

ACCC grants conditional authorisation for an alliance between Qantas and Emirates

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

ACCC grants conditional authorisation for an alliance between Qantas and Emirates

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 26, 2013, 6:20 pm
  #1  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Wellington
Programs: QFWP (LTSG), NZ (Jade), TG ROP (Forgotten), OZ (Silver), AA (Cardboard), EK (Lowest of the Low)
Posts: 4,669
Exclamation ACCC grants conditional authorisation for an alliance between Qantas and Emirates

The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission has decided to grant authorisation, subject to a condition, for an alliance between Qantas Airways Limited and Emirates until 31 March 2018.

The alliance will involve coordination of the airlines’ passenger and cargo transport operations and other related services.

“The ACCC considers that the alliance is likely to result in public benefits through enhanced products and service offerings by the airlines, and improved operating efficiency,” ACCC Chairman Rod Sims said.

“In particular, the alliance is likely to provide Qantas and Emirates customers with increased access to a large number of existing frequencies and destinations under a single airline code, improved connectivity and scheduling, and access to each alliance partner’s frequent flyer programs. The alliance is also likely to provide the airlines with increased flexibility to manage their fleet.”

“Taking all of this together, the ACCC is satisfied that the alliance is likely to result in material, but not substantial, public benefits.”

“The ACCC considers that the alliance is likely to result in detriments through its effect on competition in regions where Qantas and Emirates currently offer competing air passenger and cargo transport services. However, in most of these regions, the ACCC has identified competitive constraints which mean that these detriments are likely to be minimal,” Mr Sims said.

“The one exception is the trans-Tasman where Qantas and Emirates compete on four routes which accounted for around 65% of total passenger capacity between Australia and New Zealand in the year to 30 June 2012. On these routes, the ACCC is concerned that Qantas and Emirates will have the ability and incentive to reduce or limit growth in capacity in order to raise airfares.”

In order to address this concern, the ACCC has imposed a condition of authorisation which requires the airlines to maintain at least their pre-alliance aggregate capacity on the four overlapping trans-Tasman routes, subject to a review to consider whether increases in the minimum required capacity are warranted.

With this condition, the ACCC is satisfied that the relevant net public benefit tests are met.

“The ACCC has assessed the public benefits and detriments of the alliance on the basis that the scope of Qantas’ international operations in the likely future without the alliance is not materially different to the likely future with the alliance. In particular, the ACCC does not accept or rely on the claim that Qantas International is in “terminal decline” and unable to compete effectively or operate profitably absent the alliance,” Mr Sims said.

The conduct authorised by the ACCC enables the airlines to coordinate their passenger and cargo transport operations and related services (including line maintenance engineering services and flight training for air crew and cabin crew) as well as joint procurement of goods and services (such as aviation fuel). Qantas and Emirates have not sought authorisation for the supply to third parties of catering and aircraft cleaning services, where coordination between the two airlines may give rise to competition concerns.

The ACCC has amended the interim authorisation granted on 17 January 2013 to reflect the terms of the final determination. Interim authorisation will remain in force until the ACCC’s decision comes into effect.

Authorisation provides protection from court action for conduct that might otherwise raise concerns under the competition provisions of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010. Broadly, the ACCC may grant an authorisation when it is satisfied that the public benefit from the conduct outweighs any public detriment.

Further information, including the application, public submissions and ACCC decisions can be found at
acc.gov.au
Blackcloud is offline  
Old Mar 26, 2013, 7:36 pm
  #2  
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: LON
Programs: QF Plat & LTG, VA Plat
Posts: 1,435
Well I guess we are stuck with it now.
justin_krusty is offline  
Old Mar 26, 2013, 11:59 pm
  #3  
Original Member
 
Join Date: May 1998
Location: Portland OR Double Emerald (QF and AA), DL PM/MM, Starwood Plat
Posts: 19,589
Trans-Tasman is a big win, with EK's stated plans to reduce capacity and leave it to QF being scuppered. That at least ensures continued A380/777 services TT.
number_6 is offline  
Old Mar 27, 2013, 12:11 am
  #4  
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: LON
Programs: QF Plat & LTG, VA Plat
Posts: 1,435
On Tuesday ACCC also approved QF/JQ to cooperate with JQ Asia/Pacific/Japan/HK, hopefully this improves things in that area.

http://www.theaustralian.com.au/busi...-1226606550452
justin_krusty is offline  
Old Mar 27, 2013, 12:23 am
  #5  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Programs: QFF
Posts: 5,304
Originally Posted by justin_krusty
On Tuesday ACCC also approved QF/JQ to cooperate with JQ Asia/Pacific/Japan/HK, hopefully this improves things in that area.

http://www.theaustralian.com.au/busi...-1226606550452
It allows QF/JQ to cooperate with the other Jetstar brands, and also for the other Jetstars to cooperate with their local part owner airline (eg, GK and JL).
Himeno is offline  
Old Mar 27, 2013, 12:41 am
  #6  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 44,600
Heaven forbid that different companies be required to , I dunno, compete
Dave Noble is offline  
Old Mar 27, 2013, 11:11 am
  #7  
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Programs: NZ Koru
Posts: 6,414
Tasman still isn't a win for QF, the NZ Government has yet to approve it.
cavemanzk is offline  
Old Mar 27, 2013, 2:20 pm
  #8  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Wellington
Programs: QFWP (LTSG), NZ (Jade), TG ROP (Forgotten), OZ (Silver), AA (Cardboard), EK (Lowest of the Low)
Posts: 4,669
Originally Posted by cavemanzk
Tasman still isn't a win for QF, the NZ Government has yet to approve it.
Yes big risk considering they do not like approving these deals as they reduce competition like NZ and CX, NZ and VA etc.
Blackcloud is offline  
Old Mar 27, 2013, 2:33 pm
  #9  
In Memoriam
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Katoomba (Blue Mountains)
Programs: Mucci
Posts: 8,083
Originally Posted by cavemanzk
Tasman still isn't a win for QF, the NZ Government has yet to approve it.
Can't see what the Government of the Seventh State ( ) can do about it, since there isn't a skerrick of a chance that QF and EK will be colluding on trans-Tasman services. In favt, the ACCC mandating that QF and EK maintain current frequencies under the status quo will mean no change under the new arrangements compared to the old.

Dave
thadocta is offline  
Old Mar 27, 2013, 2:47 pm
  #10  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Wellington
Programs: QFWP (LTSG), NZ (Jade), TG ROP (Forgotten), OZ (Silver), AA (Cardboard), EK (Lowest of the Low)
Posts: 4,669
Originally Posted by thadocta
Can't see what the Government of the Seventh State ( ) can do about it, since there isn't a skerrick of a chance that QF and EK will be colluding on trans-Tasman services. In favt, the ACCC mandating that QF and EK maintain current frequencies under the status quo will mean no change under the new arrangements compared to the old.

Dave
It depends if the alliance has revenue/cost sharing and agreement on pricing.
Unfortunately I see the end of the good premium cabin sale fares that we used to get over here, just like with the NZ/CX alliance.
Blackcloud is offline  
Old Mar 27, 2013, 3:41 pm
  #11  
In Memoriam
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Katoomba (Blue Mountains)
Programs: Mucci
Posts: 8,083
Originally Posted by Blackcloud
It depends if the alliance has revenue/cost sharing and agreement on pricing.
Unfortunately I see the end of the good premium cabin sale fares that we used to get over here, just like with the NZ/CX alliance.
Either way, I can't see how the NZ government can do anything if the status quo stands on trans-Tasman. The only formal co-operation will be west of the West Island east coast (there, I got both sides of the argument - "Seventh State" and "West Island" into the one thread) and therefore not impacting on NZ at all.

Removing sale pricing an premium fares, not sure if that will happen, both carriers will want to fill their planes. Flying an A380 or a B777 across the ditch is exxy, and I think EK will still want to get every dollar they can possibly get.

Dave
thadocta is offline  
Old Mar 27, 2013, 9:05 pm
  #12  
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Programs: NZ Koru
Posts: 6,414
Originally Posted by Blackcloud
Yes big risk considering they do not like approving these deals as they reduce competition like NZ and CX, NZ and VA etc.
CX/NZ & VA/NZ we're both approved by the NZ Govt, as they both added value to there asset, we as QF/EK takes value away.


So are the QF Clubs days in Auckland numbered?
cavemanzk is offline  
Old Mar 28, 2013, 12:03 am
  #13  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Wellington
Programs: QFWP (LTSG), NZ (Jade), TG ROP (Forgotten), OZ (Silver), AA (Cardboard), EK (Lowest of the Low)
Posts: 4,669
Originally Posted by cavemanzk
CX/NZ & VA/NZ we're both approved by the NZ Govt, as they both added value to there asset, we as QF/EK takes value away.


So are the QF Clubs days in Auckland numbered?
Yes I was being sarcastic.
QF Club will stay as the Emirate lounge is open only fr limited periods but there are many more QF, LA, CX, TN etc flights that use it.
Blackcloud is offline  
Old Apr 1, 2013, 3:48 pm
  #14  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Melbourne
Programs: ►QFWP/LTG►VA WP►HyattExpl.►HiltonGold►ALL Silver
Posts: 21,994
Originally Posted by cavemanzk
Tasman still isn't a win for QF, the NZ Government has yet to approve it.

I believe number_6 meant a win for PAX, not the airlines:
Originally Posted by number_6
Trans-Tasman is a big win, with EK's stated plans to reduce capacity and leave it to QF being scuppered. That at least ensures continued A380/777 services TT.
I read it a couple of time before realising it really make no sense to read it any other way.
serfty is offline  
Old Apr 1, 2013, 6:21 pm
  #15  
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: country Western Australia
Programs: QF SG(LTS) - AA LTG(1MM)
Posts: 2,771
A devious and ill-motivated person might wonder what would have happened if the NZ authorities had REQUIRED EK to reduce their flying into NZ as a result of the agreement with QF.

Just wondering

Fred
wandering_fred is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.