Community
Wiki Posts
Search

QANTAS forges Emirates tie

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 25, 2012, 8:00 pm
  #16  
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Kent, UK
Programs: BA Gold, SPG Platinum, Marriott Platinum, Hilton Diamond
Posts: 3,809
Originally Posted by Cedar Jet
Also, the EK DXB terminal is akin to a zoo...always full and J lounge is just a terminal within a terminal always a frenzy of people...nothing really premium about it or intimate.
Agreed, it's horrible. I really hope that this doesn't happen.

I don't understand why on one hand the government allows many foreign airlines (sometimes government owned or subsidised) to land in Australia and on the other hand, strangles Qantas with various legislation and regulation so it has an uncompetitive cost base.

It's a shame because I believe that with the A380 at least QF have a truly great product.
matthandy is offline  
Old Jul 25, 2012, 8:21 pm
  #17  
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
Posts: 949
Originally Posted by matthandy
Agreed, it's horrible. I really hope that this doesn't happen.

I don't understand why on one hand the government allows many foreign airlines (sometimes government owned or subsidised) to land in Australia and on the other hand, strangles Qantas with various legislation and regulation so it has an uncompetitive cost base.

It's a shame because I believe that with the A380 at least QF have a truly great product.
*non-reconfigured A380.
Platinum A332 is offline  
Old Jul 25, 2012, 8:47 pm
  #18  
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Sydney, Australia
Programs: QF Gold LTG (ow Saph), HHon Silver, Marriot Gold
Posts: 2,927
Originally Posted by Platinum A332
*non-reconfigured A380.
No change to First...
And for Plats flying economy a nice upper deck cabin.
moa999 is offline  
Old Jul 25, 2012, 8:52 pm
  #19  
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: SYD
Programs: QF Platinum (LTG), OW Emerald, Accor Platinum; Hyatt Explorist.
Posts: 2,165
Originally Posted by moa999
No change to First...
And for Plats flying economy a nice upper deck cabin.
And less toilets for J pax
Cedar Jet is offline  
Old Jul 25, 2012, 9:03 pm
  #20  
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Sydney, Australia
Programs: QF Gold LTG (ow Saph), HHon Silver, Marriot Gold
Posts: 2,927
Originally Posted by Cedar Jet
And less toilets for J pax
Same number - 4.
Less J pax - 64 very 72 - should reduce PJ queues.
Just 35 extra PE pax to share the back 2 with.

Last edited by moa999; Jul 25, 2012 at 11:44 pm
moa999 is offline  
Old Jul 25, 2012, 9:48 pm
  #21  
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: SYD
Programs: QF Platinum (LTG), OW Emerald, Accor Platinum; Hyatt Explorist.
Posts: 2,165
Originally Posted by moa999
Same number - 4.
Less J pax - 64 very 72 - should reduce PJ queues.
Just 30 extra PE pax to share the back 2 with.
QF: 64 J - 4 lavs
MH:66 J - 4 lavs
CZ: 70 J - 5 lavs
EK: 76 J - 5 lavs
AF: 80 J - 4 lavs
KE: 94 J - 5 lavs
LH: 98 J - 5 lavs

None of above competitors appear to share any of their lavs with other classes looking at seat maps.

If QF indeed is 4 lavs in J on A380 we ain't doing too badly afterall, BUT if we are sharing with W Class we are worst off!

"It's a fine line(curtain) between pleasure and pain"

So we'll be 99 pax(J, Y+) to 4 lavs..from industry best to industry worst-Well done Qantas

Last edited by Cedar Jet; Jul 25, 2012 at 11:56 pm
Cedar Jet is offline  
Old Jul 25, 2012, 11:15 pm
  #22  
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 479
Originally Posted by moa999
Same number - 4.
Less J pax - 64 very 72 - should reduce PJ queues.
Just 30 extra PE pax to share the back 2 with.
A small point of order (ordure?) but it's actually 35 PE pax.
DH188 is offline  
Old Jul 26, 2012, 12:11 am
  #23  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,335
From the Wall Street Journal [paywall]:

Emirates Chief Executive Tim Clark said in an interview last month that although the carrier isn't interested in seeking an equity investment in Qantas, it would be open to other types of commercial arrangements, such as codesharing.
nth_utsera_sth_utsera is offline  
Old Jul 26, 2012, 12:19 am
  #24  
Moderator, Trip Reports
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Denver, CO
Programs: UA GS-2MM, Marriott Ambassador
Posts: 3,715
And this just in courtesy The Age (and SMH)
http://www.theage.com.au/business/qa...726-22u75.html
eightblack is offline  
Old Jul 26, 2012, 12:44 am
  #25  
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 5,596
Lots of talk about CX here,but no mention of MH,which is about to join Oneworld.Standby for BA to announce restarting flights to KUL with one of its newly aquired slot pairs.
rapidex is offline  
Old Jul 26, 2012, 2:11 am
  #26  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Australia
Posts: 315
Yeahhhh Im sooo excited about it!!

Don't forget that RJ has a partner with EY.
Bluesky is offline  
Old Jul 26, 2012, 2:19 am
  #27  
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 155
CX is never going to be a partner for QF - they aren't interested, have been pretty clear they don't want to really partner with anyone. They are the black sheep of the oneworld alliance.
VHOEJ is offline  
Old Jul 26, 2012, 6:17 am
  #28  
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
Posts: 949
Originally Posted by VHOEJ
CX is never going to be a partner for QF - they aren't interested, have been pretty clear they don't want to really partner with anyone. They are the black sheep of the oneworld alliance.
I disagree.

- Pretty good relationship with JL (covering HKG-Japan, as well as Japan-HNL).
- A good relationship with BA codesharing on flights beyond LHR, and BA codesharing on CX flights beyond HKG.
- A very strong relationship across the pacific with AA.
- Strong relationship via LAX, JFK and AKL with LA to South America.
- Codesharing with AY to HEL, as well as AY codes being placed on CX flights to Australia and HKG-BKK.
- No codesharing with RJ, but CX/RJ combination fares are competitively priced out of Jordan and Australia.
- Strong relationship with member-elect MH.

CX and QF entered a codeshare arrangement for HKG-FCO. It is QF that operate flights that do not connect (e.g. 12 hour return flying back from Rome). Anecdotal evidence suggests that a QF WP gets treated much better on CX than a CX Diamond on QF.

So perhaps it is QF being the black sheep and not CX?
Platinum A332 is offline  
Old Jul 26, 2012, 6:53 am
  #29  
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: England
Programs: Executive Club Silver
Posts: 711
I can see the advantages for Qantas:
Pretty much gauranteed 5th freedom rights beyond DXB
Huge airline which connects extensively to EU, Middle east and Africa
Better 1 stop option for customers with little backtracking


Advantages for Emirates:
Can get a huge chunk of Qantas's frequent flyers
Less competition from the mighty SIN hub
Can access smaller Aussie/NZ cities with codeshares like Hobart, Wellington, Townsville

Personally I think QF might be better suited to doing this kind of agreements with QR and inviting QR to Oneworld, with BA also feeding their Heathrow traffic through Doha.

Or Heaven forbid making this agreement with Cathay Pacific!

QF can still codeshare with MH for regional South East Asia routes like Indonesia, Malaysia, Thailand, Burma, Vietnam where a mid-east hub would require backtracking and where MH has better range of destinations and frequency.

Originally Posted by Platinum A332
I disagree.

- Pretty good relationship with JL (covering HKG-Japan, as well as Japan-HNL).
- A good relationship with BA codesharing on flights beyond LHR, and BA codesharing on CX flights beyond HKG.
- A very strong relationship across the pacific with AA.
- Strong relationship via LAX, JFK and AKL with LA to South America.
- Codesharing with AY to HEL, as well as AY codes being placed on CX flights to Australia and HKG-BKK.
- No codesharing with RJ, but CX/RJ combination fares are competitively priced out of Jordan and Australia.
- Strong relationship with member-elect MH.

CX and QF entered a codeshare arrangement for HKG-FCO. It is QF that operate flights that do not connect (e.g. 12 hour return flying back from Rome). Anecdotal evidence suggests that a QF WP gets treated much better on CX than a CX Diamond on QF.

So perhaps it is QF being the black sheep and not CX?
I agree with your point completley, it seems to me that QF doesn't want to play clean, such as starting HKG-LHR and Jetstar Hong Kong.


It is glad to see Qantas in the real world, by the number of tag-on flights and the RedQ failed idea it appears that they have wanted to take passangers everywhere on their own metal, but now they have come to their senses to use partner airlines to do that for them.

Last edited by PotNoodle; Jul 26, 2012 at 7:09 am
PotNoodle is offline  
Old Jul 26, 2012, 7:44 am
  #30  
Moderator: Asiana & Qantas Frequent Flyer
Aman Contributor Badge
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: STR/SYD/SMF
Programs: QF Lifetime SG, LH HON, OZ Lifetime Diamond +, HH Diamond, Marriott Lifetime Platinum
Posts: 14,375
Link to the original story:

http://www.afr.com/p/national/qantas...7oRkwZIgeI6VQJ
DownUnderFlyer is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.