Surviving Disaster - Hijacking
#1
Original Poster
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 4,704
Surviving Disaster - Hijacking
So who saw this episode? Every week they do a disaster and what one needs to survive it. Last week's was hijacking. An ex-SEAL does the commentary.
It was overly dramatic, I thought, but interesting. It highlighted the need for planning and cooperation in a hijacking, which will, in my estimation, be the thing most likely attacked by a hijacking crew. They too learned lessons from 9/11 and this was one of the most important.
http://www.spike.com/full-episode/hijack/33542
It was overly dramatic, I thought, but interesting. It highlighted the need for planning and cooperation in a hijacking, which will, in my estimation, be the thing most likely attacked by a hijacking crew. They too learned lessons from 9/11 and this was one of the most important.
http://www.spike.com/full-episode/hijack/33542
Last edited by law dawg; Sep 3, 2009 at 2:58 pm Reason: added link
#2


Join Date: May 2009
Location: DCA
Programs: AA Gold
Posts: 50
Disappointing episode. For the sake of having a full-length episode, they espoused and encouraged the "Flight 93" model: initial compliance with the hijackers, and then an eventual re-taking of the aircraft.
I'd think that "no compliance, ever" and "immediately attack" would be more useful and realistic advice. Then again, that only works if people have an immediate visceral sense that getting hijacked is already a death sentence. The show was probably accurate in depicting the realization as being gradual, rather than immediate.
In any case, the final two-thirds of the episode was pure filler. I particularly liked how the FA's actually had to be "instructed" by the superhero-pax as to their duties during an emergency evacuation.
I'd think that "no compliance, ever" and "immediately attack" would be more useful and realistic advice. Then again, that only works if people have an immediate visceral sense that getting hijacked is already a death sentence. The show was probably accurate in depicting the realization as being gradual, rather than immediate.
In any case, the final two-thirds of the episode was pure filler. I particularly liked how the FA's actually had to be "instructed" by the superhero-pax as to their duties during an emergency evacuation.
#4
Original Poster
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 4,704
Disappointing episode. For the sake of having a full-length episode, they espoused and encouraged the "Flight 93" model: initial compliance with the hijackers, and then an eventual re-taking of the aircraft.
I'd think that "no compliance, ever" and "immediately attack" would be more useful and realistic advice. Then again, that only works if people have an immediate visceral sense that getting hijacked is already a death sentence. The show was probably accurate in depicting the realization as being gradual, rather than immediate.
In any case, the final two-thirds of the episode was pure filler. I particularly liked how the FA's actually had to be "instructed" by the superhero-pax as to their duties during an emergency evacuation.
I'd think that "no compliance, ever" and "immediately attack" would be more useful and realistic advice. Then again, that only works if people have an immediate visceral sense that getting hijacked is already a death sentence. The show was probably accurate in depicting the realization as being gradual, rather than immediate.
In any case, the final two-thirds of the episode was pure filler. I particularly liked how the FA's actually had to be "instructed" by the superhero-pax as to their duties during an emergency evacuation.
#5
FlyerTalk Evangelist



Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 38,543
I haven't seen the show but I think it depends on what the hijackers want.
So long as they are content to give orders but not enter the flight deck the old rules should apply--give them what they want. If they try to force their way onto the flight deck, though, attack at once. You don't want them to get the controls and you also want to protect the pilots--if you lose them you had better hope someone on board can figure out the radio.
So long as they are content to give orders but not enter the flight deck the old rules should apply--give them what they want. If they try to force their way onto the flight deck, though, attack at once. You don't want them to get the controls and you also want to protect the pilots--if you lose them you had better hope someone on board can figure out the radio.
#6
FlyerTalk Evangelist




Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Marriott or Hilton hot tub with a big drink <glub> Beverage: To-Go Bag DYKWIA:SSSS /rolleyes ☈ Date Night:Costco
Programs: Sea Shell Lounge Platinum, TSA Pre✓ Refusnik Diamond, PWP Gold, FT subset of the subset
Posts: 12,523
I was channel surfing in my hotel a while ago and just caught the last ~30 minutes by chance, right when they hog tied a bad guy on the floor. I was wondering how the hijackers got behind a locked cockpit door. I figured they rushed the door when a pilot was taking a potty break, so it’s disappointing to now hear there was compliance, but then that’s entertainment.
#7
Original Poster
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 4,704
I haven't seen the show but I think it depends on what the hijackers want.
So long as they are content to give orders but not enter the flight deck the old rules should apply--give them what they want. If they try to force their way onto the flight deck, though, attack at once. You don't want them to get the controls and you also want to protect the pilots--if you lose them you had better hope someone on board can figure out the radio.
So long as they are content to give orders but not enter the flight deck the old rules should apply--give them what they want. If they try to force their way onto the flight deck, though, attack at once. You don't want them to get the controls and you also want to protect the pilots--if you lose them you had better hope someone on board can figure out the radio.
The problem with your "at once" is that if you jump up to go to work, you'd better hope some other people do so right there with you. Not 10 seconds later, not a minute later - right then. Because if you jump up alone in a hijacking you're easy meat.
I do agree with your assessment, though, reservations aside. It's just my experience that most people can't go from resting to killing in the snap of the fingers.
#8
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Central California
Programs: Former UA Premex, now dirt
Posts: 6,531
#9
Original Poster
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 4,704
#11
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Florida
Posts: 3,006
I am watching this show right now. They have disabled all the hijackers except the one in the cockpit.
They are showing how to restrain the hijackers. One observation, dead men give you no troubles. Kill your captured hijackers. Ta-da.
Ok this show is about to aggravate me.
EDIT: I could not take it anymore, changed the channel.
They are showing how to restrain the hijackers. One observation, dead men give you no troubles. Kill your captured hijackers. Ta-da.
Ok this show is about to aggravate me.
EDIT: I could not take it anymore, changed the channel.
Last edited by Trollkiller; Sep 6, 2009 at 8:52 am
#12
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 843
H. L. Mencken
Your life or his life? Desperate times may call for desperate actions. Gives me pause to think. Could I? Would I? You?
#13
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Florida
Posts: 3,006
After 9/11 we all understand what the end result of a hijacking that attempts to take over the cockpit.
If I am going to die either way I will die fighting. I have never been able to understand how a person can passively wait to die or follow orders from a captor when the end result will be death.
I watch a good amount of shows on history. When ever I see the clip of a man running to the edge of a pit so a SS agent can shoot him it boggles my mind every time.
To me not fighting a hijacker after 9/11 is the same thing and I simply can not wrap my head around it.
Last edited by Trollkiller; Sep 6, 2009 at 11:42 am Reason: typo
#14
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 843
Could I? Yes. Would I? Yes.
After 9/11 we all understand what the end result of a hijacking that attempts to take over the cockpit.
If I am going to die either way I will die fighting. I have never been able to understand how a person can passively wait to die or follow orders from a captor when the end result will be death.
I watch a good amount of shows on history. When ever I see the clip of a man running to the edge of a pit so a SS agent can shoot him it boggles my mind every time.
To me not fighting a hijacker after 9/11 is the same thing and I simply can not wrap my head around it.
After 9/11 we all understand what the end result of a hijacking that attempts to take over the cockpit.
If I am going to die either way I will die fighting. I have never been able to understand how a person can passively wait to die or follow orders from a captor when the end result will be death.
I watch a good amount of shows on history. When ever I see the clip of a man running to the edge of a pit so a SS agent can shoot him it boggles my mind every time.
To me not fighting a hijacker after 9/11 is the same thing and I simply can not wrap my head around it.





