Majority of TSA workers at BWI, Dulles fail recertification test
Jun 25, 2009 | 12:14 pm
#17
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Finally back in Boston after escaping from New York
Posts: 13,684
Jun 25, 2009 | 12:27 pm
#18
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 232
"TSA employees believe that many of them are being intentionally failed on the Practical Skills Evaluation recertification test so that the agency doesn’t have to give them raises and bonuses. A letter send by the American Federation of Government Employees to Homeland Security Sec. Janet Napolitano and House Homeland Security chairman Bennie Thompson calls for a nationwide investigation into test standards and the training of TSA screeners."
Awwww! The test is SO hard!!!
Fire them!!!
Awwww! The test is SO hard!!!
Fire them!!!
If people failed, they aren't even told or shown what they missed. Simply that they failed. There is no repercussion for it, because they retest you a few days later, and if you pass that, you just take a hit on your PASS score for the year.
Of course, you can go as slow as you want in the test as well, so you can take 30 minutes in a pat-down and no one will bat an eyelash.
No matter how you slice it is all a joke.
Last edited by Cholula; Jun 25, 2009 at 4:30 pm Reason: Inappropriate language for TS/S Forum
Jun 26, 2009 | 10:37 pm
#21
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Florida
Posts: 3,006
Jun 27, 2009 | 5:11 am
#22
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: ORD
Programs: CO PLT, HH DIA
Posts: 1,461
"TSA employees believe that many of them are being intentionally failed on the Practical Skills Evaluation recertification test so that the agency doesnt have to give them raises and bonuses. A letter send by the American Federation of Government Employees to Homeland Security Sec. Janet Napolitano and House Homeland Security chairman Bennie Thompson calls for a nationwide investigation into test standards and the training of TSA screeners."
Awwww! The test is SO hard!!!
Fire them!!!
Awwww! The test is SO hard!!!
Fire them!!!
--PP
Jun 27, 2009 | 5:16 am
#23
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: ORD
Programs: CO PLT, HH DIA
Posts: 1,461
Welcome to organized labor.
--PP
Jun 27, 2009 | 6:17 am
#24
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 10,034
It's all so mind-numbingly ridiculous.
On one hand, the TSA wants to put on this face to the public that they're this organization that wants to eliminate every single possibility of something passing by the checkpoint.
Yet the people being paid to seek out such prohibited items, whether it's on a person or in a bag get multiple chances to make up for their errors (including GAO tests).
Does the TSA realize you don't get "do-overs" or "remedial testing" in real-life?
On one hand, the TSA wants to put on this face to the public that they're this organization that wants to eliminate every single possibility of something passing by the checkpoint.
Yet the people being paid to seek out such prohibited items, whether it's on a person or in a bag get multiple chances to make up for their errors (including GAO tests).
Does the TSA realize you don't get "do-overs" or "remedial testing" in real-life?
Jun 27, 2009 | 7:19 am
#26
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: BWI
Programs: AA Gold, HH Diamond, National Emerald Executive, TSA Disparager Gold
Posts: 15,180
Jun 27, 2009 | 7:29 am
#27
Moderator: Smoking Lounge; FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: SFO
Programs: Lifetime (for now) Gold MM, HH Gold, Giving Tootsie Pops to UA employees, & a retired hockey goalie
Posts: 29,078
Jun 27, 2009 | 6:54 pm
#28
Join Date: May 2009
Location: NYC
Programs: NTEU (LGA)
Posts: 12
I encounter this with TSOs a lot. There are two measures for thoroughness. One is a matter of judgment (i.e. did the TSO apply sufficient pressure to theoretically detect a hidden item?). The other is pretty straightforward (i.e. did the TSO find the hidden knife?).
It is not unusual for a TSO who found, say a hidden knife for instance, to still fail the evaluation. If they found the knife strapped to the upper torso but never bothered to pat down the legs, for example, then the overall performance is a failure.
The evaluation process isn't perfect. There is room for improvement, and I'm putting together a set of recommendations (may be pissing in the wind with that, but I think I've established a degree of credibility within TSA). However, it is a fair process. TSOs fail because they did not follow procedures correctly. I have absolutely no uncertainty, doubts, second-thoughts or question about the officers I failed. Conversely, I have no uncertainty, doubts, second-thoughts or question about the officers I passed.
It is what it is.
It is not unusual for a TSO who found, say a hidden knife for instance, to still fail the evaluation. If they found the knife strapped to the upper torso but never bothered to pat down the legs, for example, then the overall performance is a failure.
The evaluation process isn't perfect. There is room for improvement, and I'm putting together a set of recommendations (may be pissing in the wind with that, but I think I've established a degree of credibility within TSA). However, it is a fair process. TSOs fail because they did not follow procedures correctly. I have absolutely no uncertainty, doubts, second-thoughts or question about the officers I failed. Conversely, I have no uncertainty, doubts, second-thoughts or question about the officers I passed.
It is what it is.
Also when it comes to the IMA's' there should be (through sheer common sense) a report of the assessment shown to TSo's, That way if they fail they can at least see what areas to improve on.
Just food for thought