Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Cell Phone Use

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 6, 2009 | 1:32 pm
  #16  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 304
Originally Posted by SDF_Traveler
I've never heard of 1,000 ft on a short-haul (typo?)
Whether it's a typo or not, it has no relation to the FAA reg.

The reg that applies is in Title 14 of the Code of Federal Regulations, section 91.21, Portable electronic devices.

91.21 completely prohibits the use of portable electronic devices, without regard to altitude. However, it does have an exception - if the operator or pilot in command determines that a device can be used w/o interference to aircraft systems. If an operator has made a non-interference determination, maybe they put in an altitude restriction so as not to "tempt the fates."
CUTiger78 is offline  
Old Jun 6, 2009 | 1:43 pm
  #17  
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: DCA / WAS
Programs: DL 2+ million/PM, YX, Marriott Plt, *wood gold, HHonors, CO Plt, UA, AA EXP, WN, AGR
Posts: 9,386
Just to point out:

Most models of Blackberry have a mode that emits no RF - the so-called "airplane mode" (really it's an RF-off mode, but same difference). You can use the blackberry much as a computer - read emails that have already downloaded and draft new emails that will be sent when you're on the ground and RF is turned back on. That's allowed on virtually all flights once use of electronic devices is permitteed.

Further, most new models of blackberry will operate WiFi - which is now available on many flights. Again, perfectly allowed use.

So, I would not be to concerned about someone typing on a blackberry during flight. And I would certainly take exception to a busybody fellow passenger that elected to make a stink without understanding how these things can work.

JMHO.
Global_Hi_Flyer is offline  
Old Jun 7, 2009 | 12:54 pm
  #18  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Doha, Qatar
Programs: Air Canada Aeroplan, Lufthansa Miles & More, Flying Blue, Hyatt Gold Passport
Posts: 1,894
Originally Posted by etch5895
I'd prefer that you keep your bloody cell phone off for the duration of the flight. In truth, I'd be happy to watch you throw it on the tarmac and stomp on it.

Yes, I am one of the few Americans who (gasp) does not have a cell phone. And my life is every bit as rich in spite of this.
Resistence is futile. Lower your shields and prepare to be assimilated.
polonius is offline  
Old Jun 7, 2009 | 6:16 pm
  #19  
Moderator, Omni, Omni/PR, Omni/Games, FlyerTalk Posting Legend
20 Countries Visited
1M
40 Nights
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Between DCA and IAD
Programs: UA 1K MM; Hilton Diamond
Posts: 72,646
Originally Posted by SDF_Traveler
I've never heard of 1,000 ft on a short-haul (typo?) -

Most of my short-haul flights still go above 10,000 ft and often cruise around 20,000-29,000 ft as they're all pressurized aircraft whether it is a Dash-8/Saab-340 (or other turbo prop) or a regional jet of some type.
There are several (mostly EAS) routes I'm aware of which likely don't go much above 3k feet, using pressurized aircraft--either SF3s or B1900s, IME, though I believe there was at least one with a Dash8.

Some I can think of (some of which are defunct now, but were around a year or two ago):
  • BLF-BKW (34 miles; BLF no longer gets commercial service, but when it did, that was a fun flight--you could look out the cockpit from row 1 or 2 on the B1900)
  • ORF-PHF (something like 17 miles; US used to operate this once a week with a Dash8, but it's defunct now, I believe)
  • CKB-MGW (this was a US EAS route, something like 20 miles; at one point, it continued on to nearby PIT, but if it's still in service I believe it goes to IAD now)

Most of the other short hauls I've taken do get up over 10k feet, though; even SFO-SMF and SFO-MRY on EMB120s go above 10k feet IIRC.
exerda is offline  
Old Jun 7, 2009 | 6:20 pm
  #20  
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: ewr,swf,fll
Posts: 835
Originally Posted by yyzvoyageur
You forget, though, that those twits are far more important than you or I and even those few extra minutes of being out of touch could spell absolute disaster.
lol. true. i love the losers who bring the laptop into, say, a hooters. big deals goin on baby! better have the phone in the ear and the laptop goin...
4444 is offline  
Old Jun 7, 2009 | 6:29 pm
  #21  
Moderator, Omni, Omni/PR, Omni/Games, FlyerTalk Posting Legend
20 Countries Visited
1M
40 Nights
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Between DCA and IAD
Programs: UA 1K MM; Hilton Diamond
Posts: 72,646
Originally Posted by 4444
lol. true. i love the losers who bring the laptop into, say, a hooters. big deals goin on baby! better have the phone in the ear and the laptop goin...
Maybe they're using the laptop's built-in camera to snap some shots?
exerda is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.