Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Private jet security?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 19, 2009 | 9:59 am
  #16  
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 252
Originally Posted by IslandBased
It is important to note that there is a security program in place for GA called Airport Watch. Pilots (some 550,000) have been briefed along with (I assume) the ground support staff on reporting suspicious behavior. So far the results speak for themselves. The times I have flown on private aircraft, I found that this program to be far less intrusive than commercial flight.
Or speak it loud in theatrical boosterese (I can't find the BLINK tag):

Since 9/11, General Aviation security systems have completely prevented terrorist attacks using private planes!!!
Mr. Gel-pack is offline  
Old May 19, 2009 | 10:01 am
  #17  
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 3,004
Originally Posted by Mr. Gel-pack
Or speak it loud in theatrical boosterese (I can't find the BLINK tag):

Since 9/11, General Aviation security systems have completely prevented terrorist attacks using private planes!!!
yes, that sums it up, nicely.^^
IslandBased is offline  
Old May 19, 2009 | 10:37 am
  #18  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
20 Countries Visited
1M
40 Nights
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Marriott or Hilton hot tub with a big drink <glub> Beverage: To-Go Bag DYKWIA:SSSS /rolleyes ☈ Date Night:Costco
Programs: Sea Shell Lounge Platinum, TSA Pre✓ Refusnik Diamond, PWP Gold, FT subset of the subset
Posts: 12,523
Originally Posted by Bart
I agree that it's not practical to have private passengers undergo screening. What's the impact if a private plane were to fly into another World Trade Center tower? What's the impact if a private plane were hijacked? What's the impact if a private airplane were blown up mid-air? These are the sort of things that need to be taken into account.
No, they do not need to be taken into account any more than the possibility that I have a WMD buried in my backyard. The mere thought that the government can ask Papers Please restricting the movement of private citizens in private vehicles is sickening. Anyone who values their freedom and liberty should write their elected representatives and tell them to kill LASP dead in its tracks.
N965VJ is offline  
Old May 19, 2009 | 12:34 pm
  #19  
30 Nights
1M
50 Countries Visited
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Catania, Sicily(CTA)/South Jersey (PHL)/Houston(IAH)/Red Stick, La.(BTR)/airborne in-between
Programs: United Plat (1MM), AA ExecPlat, ITA/AZ Freccia, Hilton Diam, Bonvoy Gold, Hertz Prez, IHG gold
Posts: 3,870
Originally Posted by IslandBased
It is important to note that there is a security program in place for GA called Airport Watch. Pilots (some 550,000) have been briefed along with (I assume) the ground support staff on reporting suspicious behavior. So far the results speak for themselves. The times I have flown on private aircraft, I found that this program to be far less intrusive than commercial flight.
I've sat through a few of those breifings. The various times the TSA comes to the flight line much humour ensues.

I like to call it Operation Common Sense. We learn exciting things like "To Report suspicious activity" and "Be Alert". But as others have noted we have a 100% success rate in the corporate air world at stopping ter-wists.

Ciao,
FH
FlyingHoustonian is offline  
Old May 20, 2009 | 10:05 pm
  #20  
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Salish Sea
Programs: DL,AC,HH,PC
Posts: 8,972
Originally Posted by FlyingHoustonian
Private Jets are not built like airliners. Meaning without cockpit doors in many cases and with much more freedom of movement in the air. The TSA could do nothing to stop a nutty idiot with a cause within corporate or general aviation.
Unless they are private 737s,757s,767s, 747s and so on. These are what the TSA is probably twitchy about, although if you're flush enough to afford one of those you probably have more important things on your mind than martyrdom.

Foreign-registered airplanes go through a more intensive process, but no pax screening. And if your registration starts HZ- then you're pretty much free to do as you please anyway.
Wally Bird is offline  
Old May 21, 2009 | 1:54 am
  #21  
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: SFO
Programs: UA1P
Posts: 614
Originally Posted by Wally Bird
Unless they are private 737s,757s,767s, 747s and so on. These are what the TSA is probably twitchy about, although if you're flush enough to afford one of those you probably have more important things on your mind than martyrdom.
I can't remember the actual details but IIRC anything over 12500 pounds (or something like that) would need to be screened. Figure that is about an 8 seat (plus 2 pilot) a/c. Keep in mind, a pickup truck can carry and pull far more weight than the entire airplane. TSA should focus on something a lot more practical such as screening every single car and truck going into every major city.
12172003 is offline  
Old May 21, 2009 | 7:11 am
  #22  
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: MSP
Programs: SPG Gold;NWA gold;Hyatt Plat
Posts: 1,458
Originally Posted by 12172003
TSA should focus on something a lot more practical such as screening every single car and truck going into every major city.
I'm still surprised you can carry liquids with you on a ryder truck after Oklahoma City and the first time the WTC was bombed with one..

goaliemn is offline  
Old May 21, 2009 | 7:17 am
  #23  
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 3,004
It is much more difficult to annoy cargo than people. When was the last time you saw cargo quaking with fear?
IslandBased is offline  
Old May 21, 2009 | 8:37 am
  #24  
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: MSP
Programs: SPG Gold;NWA gold;Hyatt Plat
Posts: 1,458
Originally Posted by IslandBased
It is much more difficult to annoy cargo than people. When was the last time you saw cargo quaking with fear?
You, apparently, have never seen a shipment of Jello salad
goaliemn is offline  
Old May 21, 2009 | 8:56 am
  #25  
mkt
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: MIA/SJU/MCO
Programs: AA LT PLT; DL GLD, UA nothing, B6 Mosaic; Emerald Club Executive
Posts: 3,333
Originally Posted by Wally Bird
Foreign-registered airplanes go through a more intensive process, but no pax screening. And if your registration starts HZ- then you're pretty much free to do as you please anyway.
About 4 years ago, I was riding on a TG registered Citation, traveling FORL-FOPF.

We were ordered to land and escorted by fighter jets to an airstrip somewhere in Florida. CBP proceeded to board us and ask us every sort of questions. Namely what were 4 US citizens doing on a Guatemalan registered plane.
mkt is offline  
Old May 21, 2009 | 12:04 pm
  #26  
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 340
Originally Posted by FlyingHoustonian
You do not have to go through TSA security with private jets.
I fly private jets part time and can tell you the rules are rumoured to change. We will see how the lobbying efforts go. I do have to keep tabs on the documents of people aboard and for example, before international flights, transmit that data to CBP and get permission to take off (and hit the ADIZ), and then permission to land in the US for CBP inspection and so they can run all the pax names (eAPIS I think). I don't have my flight kit in front of me, but IIRC the cut off is a minimum of an hour before planned take off.
These rules have been voluntary for the last 6 months but became mandatory today actually.

Ciao,
FH
Exactly why I don't mind the cost of owning my own plane. Drive to the airport, unlock the gate, drive to the hanger, open the hanger, pull the 310 out, park the car in its place, close the hanger, kick the tires and light the fires. As the commercial says.....................priceless.
Centurion210 is offline  
Old May 21, 2009 | 12:44 pm
  #27  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
20 Countries Visited
500k
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: DFW
Posts: 30,971
Originally Posted by LoganTSO
Same here.

Although, I don't mind them getting screened by an ADASP team at commercial airports because technically... they are entering the AOA of the airport which says people entering are subject to screening.

Especially because I read reports every once in a while of flight students or private plane operators flying into a major airport, parking their plane and then are discovered a few hours later walking about on the AOA were they shouldn't be.

Now if only we had larger ADASP teams.
Is every single person that works on the airport screened before entering the AOA? If not what does a couple more people matter?
Boggie Dog is offline  
Old May 21, 2009 | 3:56 pm
  #28  
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: YUL
Programs: AC SE
Posts: 2,103
Originally Posted by 12172003
...IIRC anything over 12500 pounds (or something like that) would need to be screened. Figure that is about an 8 seat (plus 2 pilot) a/c.....

I think your numbers are off. For example (empty weight):
Lear 45 is 13,000+ Lbs
Challenger is 20,000+ Lbs
G5 is 48,000+ lbs

None are subject to any screening of passengers or cargo. The only restrictions are to comply with the procedures of the customs & immigration officials of the country you are trying to enter.
fly-yul is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.