|
Originally Posted by TSORon
(Post 11683311)
S When you are ready, we will be here.
|
Originally Posted by TSORon
(Post 11682467)
Before the beginning of the modern jihadist movement, most terrorists were not willing to die for their cause, but they certainly were willing to kill for it. Most terrorists are not all that bright, not by modern standards. Which is how they can convince kids, old folks, women, and others to do what they do. Pohl Pot and the Khmer Rouge showed us that
I remember the airports pre 9/11 and remember that the security was much more pleasant then than they are now. As to effectiveness they found my steel toed shoes every time. They discovered pocket change and the occasional Swiss Army knife I forgot to remove. TSA hasn't flushed any terrorists because the terrorists go after high value targets and since the cockpit doors have been hardened/airlines SOP for dealing with terrorists has changed, they've moved on to bigger and better things. The likelihood of another airline based attack is quite remote since other targets bring in a much higher return on investment. TSORon, what if there was another attack and because you personally failed a standard screening, allowed the terrorists through to complete their mission? What would you do about that failure? How would TSA spin the failure? I propose that the terrorists know airline/airport security much better than does TSA and the only reason an attack hasn't taken place is due to the return on investment for a large scale terrorist attack. |
Originally Posted by TSORon
(Post 11683311)
And now for something totally on-topic, please read here:
http://www.theaviationnation.com/200...a-flight-1824/ Funny, I can. If you believe that was a terrorist act that was stopped by the TSA and other Federal agencies, why have we heard nothing further on this? Why were not these "terrorists" charged and brought to trial. Why did an FBI agent call the incident "benign?" Quite honestly, I'm beginning to smell a real right wing extremist here. |
Originally Posted by doober
(Post 11683956)
Oh my stars, where to start? Let's start with the link TSORon gives above.
If you believe that was a terrorist act that was stopped by the TSA and other Federal agencies, why have we heard nothing further on this? Why were not these "terrorists" charged and brought to trial. Why did an FBI agent call the incident "benign?" Quite honestly, I'm beginning to smell a real right wing extremist here. |
|
Originally Posted by doober
(Post 11683956)
Quite honestly, I'm beginning to smell a real right wing extremist here.
|
This message deleted by the author.
|
Originally Posted by Trollkiller
(Post 11684184)
According to the DHS I am a Right Wing extremist, or as we like to call them here, Americans.
|
I don't know what it is that bothers me so much about this post, but I really don't like the whole "you're guilty until proven innocent" vibe I'm getting from his post. This is a nation where you're innocent until proven guilty. TSA's job is to screen us for explosives, guns, and other dangerous items. Leave the determination of who's a terrorist and who isn't to the FBI, CIA, and other agencies who know what they're doing.
In America, you're not supposed to have to prove that you're not guilty in the first place. That's what probable cause is for. Blogger Bob claims that he doesn't know if we're a terrorist or not. Why does it matter? As long as you don't have any explosives, guns, or other dangerous items on you, then you're deemed safe to be on an aircraft. I don't see why TSA is even posting this in the first place. Again, their responsibility is to screen us for the following mentioned above, and they're not FBI. |
Originally Posted by AngryMiller
(Post 11683950)
TSORon, what if there was another attack and because you personally failed a standard screening, allowed the terrorists through to complete their mission? What would you do about that failure? How would TSA spin the failure? I propose that the terrorists know airline/airport security much better than does TSA and the only reason an attack hasn't taken place is due to the return on investment for a large scale terrorist attack.
|
Originally Posted by AngryMiller
(Post 11683979)
and TSORon is the ultimate company man.
I demand a recount! JFC!!! I've been cheated! |
Originally Posted by Bart
(Post 11685863)
You mean, I've......lost......<gasp>.......that title?
I demand a recount! JFC!!! I've been cheated! |
Much as it irks me, I will have to agree with Ron. TSA is there primarily to deter terrorists from accessing the secure area of the terminal.
You all jumped to disputing that the TSA has ever caught a terrorist. That they haven't (examples to the contrary PLEASE ;) ) does not mean that nonehave been deterred by our vigilant screeners and SPOTniks. How many ? You'd have to ask the terrorists, but they probably aren't going to tell you. Of course, all the other loopholes (or oppportunities depending who you are) still exist, and I don't see any attempt to deter say, driving a truck through the flimsy perimeter fence/gates, a suicide body bomber in the terminal or a drive-by massacre of the poor fools lining up on the sidewalk. Still, that's not Ron's job; it's err.., umm.., nobody's I guess. |
Originally Posted by Bart
(Post 11682226)
I think there is some validity to what you say. True, a highly-trained professional "terrorist" (read that to mean the cold-hearted men in black who work special operations) could find ways to defeat any security program. In my previous life, I conducted what is popularly referred to as Red Team attacks against high-profile targets and always found a hole.
Where your argument is somewhat flawed is the assumption that terrorists are infallible. Even highly-trained professional field operators exhibit poker-like "tells." Argue against this all you want, I'll match my field experience against anyone on this board and prove you and anyone else wrong. The tricky part is sensitizing security personnel to detect these subtle signs and incorporating that into their security screening routines. This is where the advantage falls to the bad guys because humans are creatures of habit. This doesn't make screening pointless. It only raises the point of the challenges officers need to focus on when they screen. There are other aspects of airport security screening you conveniently overlook: the dumb passenger. No insult intended, but there are people who simply don't think. They pack acids, corrosives, flammables and other dangerous items in their checked luggage which are detected by TSOs on an all-too frequent basis. While not terrorism, these dumb acts certainly pose an equal danger to the safety of aircraft as would an IED. As for the other incidents, such as the passenger who brings a loaded firearm to the checkpoint (happens on a regular basis) or has some other dangerous prohibited item such as a hunting knife, martial arts weapon, etc., a lot of that can be attributed to either forgetfulness, ignorance or other simple mistakes. Still, the point you overlook is that TSA catches these items on a fairly frequent basis. No, none of them to date have proven to be terrorist-related. But the point you deliberately ignore is whether there is any value added to catching these items at the checkpoint. Don't bother attempting an answer, I fully expect you to fit this into your anti-TSA mantra. Pointless job? Hardly. Lax gate security did not cause the 9/11 hijackings. Yet the taxpayers and the traveling public have had TSA foisted upon them by a government intent on "doing something" post 9/11. Even though sane and cool heads within government knew very well that the hijackings weren't the fault of pre 9/11 gate security, TSA and its corps of "professional" screeners are the product of a CYA mentality in government that overrode sanity and common sense in the weeks and months following 9/11. I know this from direct participation in interagency meetings during that time. |
Folks, we've had to delete several posts as inflammatory, personal commentary.
Please stick to the topic at hand and refrain from commenting on your fellow FT'ers. Thanks for your cooperation. ______________________ Cholula Travel Safety/Security Forum Moderator |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 3:02 pm. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.