![]() |
Originally Posted by jkhuggins
(Post 11640880)
And, as you point out, 20 firearms per week, in comparison with the millions of passengers who transit a checkpoint each week, is really a very, very, very small percentage. Probably as small as the percentage of TSOs who steal from passengers.
20 guns from 14 million passengers is 1 gun per 700,000 passengers a week. (0.00014285714285714287%) The TSA employs about 45,000 TSOs. The average number of TSOs fired each year for theft is approximately 28 or 1 per 1607 TSOs. (0.06222222222222223%) As you can see the percentage of thieves that wear the TSO uniform is huge compared to the percentage of stupid, forgetful or nefarious passengers that bring a gun. |
Originally Posted by Trollkiller
(Post 11641002)
Dang it you made me do math on a Friday.
20 guns from 14 million passengers is 1 gun per 700,000 passengers a week. (0.00014285714285714287%) The TSA employs about 45,000 TSOs. The average number of TSOs fired each year for theft is approximately 28 or 1 per 1607 TSOs. (0.06222222222222223%) As you can see the percentage of thieves that wear the TSO uniform is huge compared to the percentage of stupid, forgetful or nefarious passengers that bring a gun. When you put it that way, the stats are actually kind of depressing. |
Without reading any of the rest of the thread:
Originally Posted by TK
The average number of TSOs fired each year for theft is approximately 28 or 1 per 1607 TSOs
|
Originally Posted by HSVTSO Dean
(Post 11641730)
Without reading any of the rest of the thread:
Quote: Originally Posted by TK The average number of TSOs fired each year for theft is approximately 28 or 1 per 1607 TSOs Where'd you get that number? NYTimes, December 8, 2008: Ellen Howe, a spokeswoman for the T.S.A., said Monday that the agency has fired 465 officers for theft since the spring of 2003. That is “a minuscule fraction of the work force,” she said. " 465/5.75 years in operation ("spring of 2003" through December 2008) is roughly 80 per year...so let's call 28 per year a "conservative estimate." :mad: Yeah, depressing. |
Originally Posted by HSVTSO Dean
(Post 11641730)
Without reading any of the rest of the thread:
Where'd you get that number? I had forgotten about Francine's admission. |
Hm. Okay. Just curious.
Like I said, I haven't read any more of the thread except for the first page, and, like, the last two or three posts. |
Originally Posted by HSVTSO Dean
(Post 11643094)
Hm. Okay. Just curious.
Like I said, I haven't read any more of the thread except for the first page, and, like, the last two or three posts. |
Originally Posted by Trollkiller
(Post 11643017)
I searched the PV for anything about theivery, and I never did see anyone official at TSA 'fessing up to nothin' ...where did Francine say it was 200? All I found was this exchange involving a TSA Blog Team member and a better-informed Anonymous poster, which did not engender much confidence: In a PV Post entitled Tsa, our officers, the public and theft on 2-15-08, Christopher of the TSA Evolution Blog Team wrote: "To date, we have terminated and sought prosecution for about 200 of our employees who have been accused of stealing, either from checked bags, passengers’ carry-ons or fellow employees." Then Anonymous wrote: "One of your own public affairs gonks used the figure of 269 screeners fired as of July 2007. This number doesn't include today's model citizen nor anyone else caught since last July. So, it's a heck of a lot larger than the "about 200" figure you threw out there." Christopher responded: "I'm not familiar with what a public affairs "gonk" is but I'm sure it's not a term of endearment. I was not trying to be intentionally vague when I wrote about 200. Let's agree to about 271, okay?" If TSA ever decides to attack the public relations problems it suffers from perceptions of thievery, Step One would be an honest accounting of how many pax complained and pointed the finger at TSA, how many of those complaints TSA dismissed and on what grounds, and how many of those wound up in dismissal, criminal action or both for a TSO. I can't find that level of information anywhere. |
Originally Posted by triehle
(Post 11644198)
If I am getting far afield OT here I apologize, and I certainly don't want to get into a cranky argument about numbers, but something is waaaay off here.
I searched the PV for anything about theivery, and I never did see anyone official at TSA 'fessing up to nothin' ...where did Francine say it was 200? <snip> At the end of 2008, the official TSA spokesone, Ellen Howe, is quoted in the Newspaper of Record putting the figure at 465. <snip> I am not always perfect but I try. (ok that is a lie) |
You are always aces in my book, TK.
What I find worrisome is 465 TSOs fired for theft over 5-6 years, of course, but also only 465 TSOs fired for theft at an agency that seems to have logged in something like 50,000 to 60,000 theft complaints over that same time period. I know American Transport Association complained to TSA in 2004 that reports of thefts from baggage were all-of-a-sudden way up over previous years after TSA took over airport security, and wanted an explanation and some action, but so far I haven't seen anything other than airlines saying TSOids are swiping the stuff and TSA saying it's those thieves in airline baggage. Somewhere, in the gap between 50,000 complaints and 465 fired TSOs I suspect some light-fingered TSOids are getting away with it. I have no evidence of nothing on this, just speculation, but to me, the numbers are worrisome. |
Originally Posted by spotnik
(Post 11641150)
Argh! Math. My bane... :D
When you put it that way, the stats are actually kind of depressing. |
Originally Posted by PhoenixRev
(Post 11639690)
Actually, Ron, you haven't really responded to anyone's concerns. You simply prattle on about how you are a TSO and that should immediately mean respect from the citizenry because - somehow - you putting on the TSO uniform makes you an expert. Some of your answers on this very forum indicate such a belief is pretty misguided (such as your initial insistence that carrying more than $10,000 out of the country was, in fact, illegal).
1. That statement was not made in this forum. 2. IT IS illegal to take $10,000 or more in cash or other monetary instruments outside of the united states, unless it has been properly declared. Kindly review the thread where that statement was originally made, you will see the facts. 3. I have provided facts and information to many people here. That they chose to not accept them as such is not my problem. I have also provided a few opinions, and have clearly stated they are such. You are, of course, free to call people names and insult them and wave your smug attitude of superiority as much as you wish. But, honestly, I would prefer you simply spend your valuable free time learning about what it really means to be TSO. |
TSORon, I am sure you are not the kind of person to split hairs. The good PhoenixRev was probably referring to this quote on this thread of something that you did write on the EOS Blog when he made reference to your initial insistence that carrying more than $10,000 out of the country was, in fact, illegal.
TSORon said... RB, it is against the law to take $10,000 or more in cash out of the country. Has been for a long time. You can disagree with my other statement as much as you like, the fact is that I am correct. April 4, 2009 12:53 AM It would be something worse than splitting hairs for you to imply that you personally and unambiguously cleared up your original mistake, either here or on the EOS Blog. Dozens of others on the EOS Blog, even KellyMae, did correct your mistake for you, but did you ever man up and say, "I was wrong, it's legal if you properly declare it"? No, you did not. And it would almost be dishonest for you to now write: Kindly review the thread where that statement was originally made, you will see the facts. If people choose not to accept the "facts and information you provide" it is because when you are mistaken, you do not go back and correct the record, you leave your hideous mistake out there to confuse the next person who comes along. |
I find the posturing between spotnik and TSORon just fascinating, inasmuch as it seems to be an amusing exercise in who is most noble in the quest for the Right Way to do the Wrong Thing.
Kind of hilarious, actually, for someone who can still find an external viewpoint, both of THEM being totally enwrapped in the dark flag of the TSA. And, oh, yes, ALWAYS unpredictable!!!! Ironic, ain't it? |
Originally Posted by triehle
(Post 11649789)
TSORon, I am sure you are not the kind of person to split hairs. The good PhoenixRev was probably referring to this quote on this thread of something that you did write on the EOS Blog when he made reference to your initial insistence that carrying more than $10,000 out of the country was, in fact, illegal.
Sure, the innacurate information was something you originally wrote on the EOS Blog, it just got re-quoted here. But it would be splitting hairs for you to object that the statement was not made on this forum (since it did appear here, as well as there, after all, as you can see). I apologize for the error. |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 1:57 am. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.