Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Travel&Dining > Travel Safety/Security > Practical Travel Safety and Security Issues
Reload this Page >

TSA Conducts ?Inappropriate? Screening at BNA FBOs

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

TSA Conducts ‘Inappropriate’ Screening at BNA FBOs

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 4, 2009 | 4:57 pm
  #1  
Original Poster
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: boca raton, florida
Posts: 621
TSA Conducts ‘Inappropriate’ Screening at BNA FBOs

http://www.ainonline.com/news/single...g-at-bna-fbos/
TSA Conducts ‘Inappropriate’ Screening at BNA FBOs
By by Matt Thurber
February 3, 2009
Security, Business Aviation


Transportation Security Administration officials conducted unauthorized screening of passengers and flight crew at FBOs at Nashville International Airport in December and January, according to NBAA. The screening included checking “a number of pilots and passengers with wands and actual baggage searches,” NBAA vice president of safety, security and regulation Doug Carr noted in an e-mail to members.

Signature Flight Support confirmed the accuracy of Carr’s description of events at Nashville. A TSA spokesman told AIN that inspectors “did badge verification of employees and pilots but not any hand-wanding of passengers.

The bag searches, he said, were to make “sure that nothing that poses a threat is in those bags. According to Carr, “We can confirm that based on discussions held with TSA that this kind of screening was inappropriate and should not have happened. The local TSA officials were acting beyond the guidance provided by headquarters.

The TSA effort at Nashville stemmed from a TSA document called the Playbook, which outlined TSA plans for random screenings at FBOs and hangars, originally planned at Bradley International Airport in Windsor Locks, Conn. After NBAA raised concerns about the Playbook, the TSA decided not to go ahead with the Bradley inspections, Carr explained.
knotyeagle is offline  
Old Feb 4, 2009 | 4:59 pm
  #2  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Programs: I work for the TSA
Posts: 848
Ohhhhh, the Playbook!

Just thinking about the Playbook makes my head hurt ...
oneofthosepeopleyouloveto hate is offline  
Old Feb 4, 2009 | 5:09 pm
  #3  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
20 Countries Visited
1M
40 Nights
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Marriott or Hilton hot tub with a big drink <glub> Beverage: To-Go Bag™ DYKWIA:SSSS /rolleyes ☈ Date Night:Costco
Programs: Sea Shell Lounge Platinum, TSA Pre✓ Refusnik Diamond, PWP Gold, FT subset of the subset
Posts: 12,524
Do they think LASP is in place already?
N965VJ is offline  
Old Feb 4, 2009 | 5:15 pm
  #4  
Original Poster
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: boca raton, florida
Posts: 621
Originally Posted by N965VJ
Do they think LASP is in place already?
Can't say I know. Perhaps they were just trying to find out what they could get away with. Perhaps they'll be very lucky next time that I'll be one of the people going thru the FBO to get to my aircraft.
knotyeagle is offline  
Old Feb 4, 2009 | 5:16 pm
  #5  
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: HSV
Posts: 876
Yeah, the Playbook is lame. Whoever came up with that loved football waaaaay too much.
HSVTSO Dean is offline  
Old Feb 4, 2009 | 6:02 pm
  #6  
30 Countries Visited
Community Builder
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Sydney (for now), GVA (only in my memories)
Programs: QF Lifetime Silver (big whoop)
Posts: 9,357
The local TSA officials were acting beyond the guidance provided by headquarters.
I guess there's a first time for everything.
RadioGirl is offline  
Old Feb 4, 2009 | 6:23 pm
  #7  
Moderator: Smoking Lounge; FlyerTalk Evangelist
10 Countries Visited
1M
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: SFO
Programs: Lifetime (for now) Gold MM, HH Gold, Giving Tootsie Pops to UA employees, & a retired hockey goalie
Posts: 29,078
Originally Posted by RadioGirl
The local TSA officials were acting beyond the guidance provided by headquarters.
I guess there's a first time for everything.
and a 2nd and a 3rd and a....
goalie is offline  
Old Feb 4, 2009 | 7:13 pm
  #8  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
20 Countries Visited
500k
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: DFW
Posts: 30,998
Originally Posted by knotyeagle
http://www.ainonline.com/news/single...g-at-bna-fbos/
TSA Conducts ‘Inappropriate’ Screening at BNA FBOs
By by Matt Thurber
February 3, 2009
Security, Business Aviation


Transportation Security Administration officials conducted unauthorized screening of passengers and flight crew at FBOs at Nashville International Airport in December and January, according to NBAA. The screening included checking “a number of pilots and passengers with wands and actual baggage searches,” NBAA vice president of safety, security and regulation Doug Carr noted in an e-mail to members.

Signature Flight Support confirmed the accuracy of Carr’s description of events at Nashville. A TSA spokesman told AIN that inspectors “did badge verification of employees and pilots but not any hand-wanding of passengers.

The bag searches, he said, were to make “sure that nothing that poses a threat is in those bags. According to Carr, “We can confirm that based on discussions held with TSA that this kind of screening was inappropriate and should not have happened. The local TSA officials were acting beyond the guidance provided by headquarters.

The TSA effort at Nashville stemmed from a TSA document called the Playbook, which outlined TSA plans for random screenings at FBOs and hangars, originally planned at Bradley International Airport in Windsor Locks, Conn. After NBAA raised concerns about the Playbook, the TSA decided not to go ahead with the Bradley inspections, Carr explained.
Whomever ordered these screenings should be reduced in rank to "non-government employee" post haste!
Boggie Dog is offline  
Old Feb 4, 2009 | 8:07 pm
  #9  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 2,725
Originally Posted by Boggie Dog
Whomever ordered these screenings should be reduced in rank to "non-government employee" post haste!
Should, but won't. Given past experience with federal canine fornications the person who ordered this has already been promoted.
n4zhg is offline  
Old Feb 4, 2009 | 8:17 pm
  #10  
30 Countries Visited
Community Builder
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Sydney (for now), GVA (only in my memories)
Programs: QF Lifetime Silver (big whoop)
Posts: 9,357
Originally Posted by goalie
and a 2nd and a 3rd and a....
...2745, 2746, 2747... (And those are just the ones we hear about...)
RadioGirl is offline  
Old Feb 4, 2009 | 9:29 pm
  #11  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
10 Countries Visited
Conversation Starter
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: LAX/TPE
Programs: United 1K, JAL Sapphire, SPG Lifetime Platinum, National Executive Elite, Hertz PC, Avis PC
Posts: 47,263
The FBOs should be harangued by their customers for even letting the screeners onto their property - they need to grow a set (of brains too). I'm almost tempted to call up the FBO and do a little haranguing myself.

However, it was the private pilots and passengers who let this happen to them - they could have flipped the screeners the bird, went on their way and departed and there would be nothing the screeners, nor TSA management could have done to stop them. If the screening was a violation of policy, they can't be fined for refusing it.
bocastephen is online now  
Old Feb 7, 2009 | 2:45 pm
  #12  
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: DCA / WAS
Programs: DL 2+ million/PM, YX, Marriott Plt, *wood gold, HHonors, CO Plt, UA, AA EXP, WN, AGR
Posts: 9,386
Originally Posted by Boggie Dog
Whomever ordered these screenings should be reduced in rank to "non-government employee" post haste!
Should, but they'll probably get a promotion. "keeping us safe" and all that rubbish.
Global_Hi_Flyer is offline  
Old Feb 13, 2009 | 11:45 am
  #13  
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 14
I haven't been in TS/S in a while and after reading a few threads I know why...SSDD. I did however feel a need to respond to this thread. My reply is based on the limited information available on this story and some knowledge of TSA's operating procedures. The screening may not have been completely inappropriate as claimed by Mr. Carr of the NBAA since screening of some type is allowed at DAPs. I would suggest reserving judgement until more facts are known but I doubt that will happen given the track record of this forum.
anonymous484 is offline  
Old Feb 13, 2009 | 11:49 am
  #14  
Original Poster
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: boca raton, florida
Posts: 621
Originally Posted by anonymous484
I haven't been in TS/S in a while and after reading a few threads I know why...SSDD. I did however feel a need to respond to this thread. My reply is based on the limited information available on this story and some knowledge of TSA's operating procedures. The screening may not have been completely inappropriate as claimed by Mr. Carr of the NBAA since screening of some type is allowed at DAPs. I would suggest reserving judgement until more facts are known but I doubt that will happen given the track record of this forum.
Let me know where/when they are going to do an "operation playbook" again and I'll be happy to be there. That way we can find out what the TSA screeners actually think they can do.
knotyeagle is offline  
Old Feb 13, 2009 | 12:26 pm
  #15  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
20 Countries Visited
500k
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: DFW
Posts: 30,998
Originally Posted by knotyeagle
Let me know where/when they are going to do an "operation playbook" again and I'll be happy to be there. That way we can find out what the TSA screeners actually think they can do.

None of my business but if you would, what field do you operate out of?

My son works at the field just south of you, the one with the blimp hanger. Is that Pompano?

Last year I was able to get a ride on the airship. Nice views of the area.

RB
Boggie Dog is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.