Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Border Bullies

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 25, 2009 | 1:36 am
  #61  
All eyes on you!
25 Years on Site
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Houston, TX, USA
Programs: UA Platinum, AA Lifetime Platinum, DL Platinum, Honors Diamond, Bonvoy Ambassador, Hertz Platinum
Posts: 8,179
Originally Posted by ICESURVIVOR1
Mike, I can tell you what happens if they had decided that she planned to live in the states, she would have been cuffed and ankle shackled, taken to an Immigration jail, and dumped in a freezing pen with up to 80 other women. She could be stuck there for months, sometimes years.
Unlikely. What you describe is the treatment given to those that are awaiting deportation, not those denied entry. Those denied entry are most often simply placed on the next flight back to wherever they came from. In some cases, they might spend a night essentially in jail if the next flight back was not until the following day.

Note that I'm not in any way defending the manner in which those denied entry and cannot be repatriated until the next day are treated or housed, nor the conditions for those in immigration detention that are awaiting deportation. All I'm saying is that someone that arrives at a US port of entry with a valid visa but is denied entry is extremely unlikely to face "months, sometimes years" in detention.
Steve M is offline  
Old Jan 25, 2009 | 8:58 am
  #62  
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 340
Originally Posted by ICESURVIVOR1
Mike, I can tell you what happens if they had decided that she planned to live in the states, she would have been cuffed and ankle shackled, taken to an Immigration jail, and dumped in a freezing pen with up to 80 other women. She could be stuck there for months, sometimes years. I worked at the bank and lived in Chicago for 20 years; I was in this jail because I sued Immigration to get them to finally spit out my green card, I was an Administrative Detainee. I am now stuck in the UK with nothing, yet I own a house with a mortgage in Chicago. Everything I have worked for 20 years has been destroyed. I paid tax on all of my earnings; I was an IRS Enrolled Agent....

As you are in shock being arrested by the men in Black, you are told to collect your medications, they just want to talk to you; you dont get a phone call, you dont see your medication again (where does it go??)

Once you are in jail you are given substitute medications, which can make you very sick. Example an elderly Indian lady with high blood pressure and diabetes, so they wake her at 5am to record her blood pressure, it shows low, they take her blood sugar as soon as she has eaten, to show it is ok; the rest of the time because she is NOT OK she is either on the cold floor or on the bunk in her cell, unable to function. She has a urine infection they won't treat, it progresses to a kidney infection, she is shaking and jolting with the pains inside her, and the guards will not do anything and punish me for asking for help for her. I made phone calls to the OIG hotline to get her help, telling them she would die if they did not do something. They wanted her to walk down the stairs, she couldnt, (they are laughing when she is throwing up and falling down off the toilet onto the floor headfirst) With another inmate we walked in front and behind her so she did not fall, the guard was annoyed, nobody told him he had to deal with this, he called for a wheelchair. They took her up to medical where she said they gave her antibiotics, she lost 10 pounds in 10 days..the day she walked back into the main cell, and she was deported and shoved on to the plane that night. She too had applied for her green card. Her file was marked RUSH too. I had four months to see the abuses in jail.
I am now having liver tests for the rash that covered my body from the throat down that I contracted in the jail. We were forced to clean 3 times a day with chemicals and no gloves.
I met Julie Myers, head of ICE, in the jail, she put her hands on the table, I told her she should wash them because it says on the bottle that if it comes into contact with the skin you should wash with cold water for 20 mins, and call the poison control center!

So that your friend was not arrested and shoved into jail she should consider herself very, very lucky. Homeland Security officership is encouraging the worst aspects of human behaviour, (Die Welle; ignorance, fascism, the need to belong Abu Ghraib! Same thing) and is creating a ready bunch of new Nazis, under your noses. There were two US Citizens in Immigration jail with me, because they make mistakes, and dont care to correct them. I watched one young Us Citizen having a nervous breakdown, she couldnt comprehend why she was in there. They spent over half a million dollars to arrest and detain me, I was not a fugitive, I worked in a bank, and have never even had a parking ticket. I am supposed to be grateful to have survived. Over 80 people have died that we know of in these jails. We only know about them because they had relatives who were citizens, who managed to get someone to listen, and put them in touch with NY Times who is keeping statistics. I have watched them bring people close to death with their tactics to demean and destroy people who were not born in the States.

So I repeat, this young Thai woman is Extremely fortunate that she was not put through this, for absolutely nothing.

But realize, this can now happen TO YOU....of course, some of you will think this is not true, until it does happen, TO YOU. I wouldt believe it if i hadnt seen it with my own eyes. I now have PTSD, becuase I really did see and experience all this and more.

now see this: http://www.nytimes.com/2009/01/19/us...s.html?_r=1&hp
Martial law is coming next.

Get to http://www.aclu.org/privacy/gen/36951prs20080929.html
I don't believe one word of this diatribe. What I do believe is this person violated US laws and was ejected for violating those laws.
Centurion210 is offline  
Old Jan 25, 2009 | 5:36 pm
  #63  
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 4,704
Originally Posted by B747-437B
Those who cooperate get that treatment. Those who argue or resist, well, they are not so fortunate.


Granted, ICESURVIVOR1 sounds like an extreme case, but I urge you to read my own personal first-hand account in this thread. Physical abuse of aliens is not uncommon. Sure, like any Law Enforcement Agency, there are good apples and bad apples. The difference is alas that most aliens deemed inadmissable (who are the vast majority of victims in these cases) do not have the recourse to any form of appeal or access to the US justice system in order to pursue damages.
I was beaten by some Mexicans once. Physical abuse of non-Mexicans is not uncommon. Sure, like any other race, there are good apples and bad apples.

<end sarcasm>
law dawg is offline  
Old Jan 25, 2009 | 6:11 pm
  #64  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
10 Countries Visited
Community Builder
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: where the chile is hot
Programs: AA,RR,NW,Delta ,UA,CO
Posts: 49,087
Originally Posted by yyzvoyageur
So, shall we let everyone in, no questions asked?

Of course not, we should never let any of them in. See post #12. After all, any time we let someone in, no matter how rigorous the screening, there's still a risk.

Then we'll all be a lot safer, right? No room for mistakes.

chollie is offline  
Old Jan 25, 2009 | 7:10 pm
  #65  
25 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Exile
Posts: 16,064
Originally Posted by law dawg
I was beaten by some Mexicans once. Physical abuse of non-Mexicans is not uncommon. Sure, like any other race, there are good apples and bad apples.
<end sarcasm>
While I do appreciate the point you are trying to make, it doesn't change the fact that I was physically assaulted by an INS officer (pre-DHS days) and that every attempt to pursue the matter was met with DoJ claiming that INS was now part of DHS so they could not investigate, and DHS claiming that the incident occured before they existed so they could not investigate. I've also spent enough time in the detention cells myself and dealt with enough inads and depus to realise that not everyone can be making up the same stories. Every account of a personal experience is inevitably skewed by the perspective of the narrator (which is inevitably biased in cases like this, including my own), but that doesn't change the FACTS of what took place in each incident.
B747-437B is offline  
Old Jan 25, 2009 | 7:38 pm
  #66  
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,849
Originally Posted by chollie
Of course not, we should never let any of them in. See post #12. After all, any time we let someone in, no matter how rigorous the screening, there's still a risk.

Then we'll all be a lot safer, right? No room for mistakes.

Right, because that's what I said! You bring nothing to a debate by trying to skew my words.
yyzvoyageur is offline  
Old Jan 25, 2009 | 8:25 pm
  #67  
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 4,704
Originally Posted by B747-437B
While I do appreciate the point you are trying to make, it doesn't change the fact that I was physically assaulted by an INS officer (pre-DHS days) and that every attempt to pursue the matter was met with DoJ claiming that INS was now part of DHS so they could not investigate, and DHS claiming that the incident occured before they existed so they could not investigate. I've also spent enough time in the detention cells myself and dealt with enough inads and depus to realise that not everyone can be making up the same stories. Every account of a personal experience is inevitably skewed by the perspective of the narrator (which is inevitably biased in cases like this, including my own), but that doesn't change the FACTS of what took place in each incident.
Before I could pass judgment on the merits of your case, I'd have to have access to the other side of the story. Of course, my opinion counts for jack and well, you know.

My point is that had you replaced the LEO/INS label with another label many would be crying racism or sexism or something else. Broad strokes and all that jazz. As someone who arrested thousands of illegal aliens with never a complaint raised, your story naturally comes from the other side of my experience. This is not to say I never used physical force - I certainly did, including deadly force. But it was justified by the situation at hand. Assault and authorized physical force are different animals. You say it was assault and it may well have been. On the other hand, it might have been legitimate use of force. Both sides of the story would be needed to judge correctly, IMO.

That's all.
law dawg is offline  
Old Jan 26, 2009 | 7:22 am
  #68  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: 80 countries across the world
Programs: some, * alliance, OW, ISIC,
Posts: 1,336
i don't nomally post in this forum due to the controversy created and the ugly things i heard but i feel compelled to point out the incident being related is not the only one to happen in recent days.

http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2009/...471656805.html

Such events are normally meant to eb rare occurance, not the norm.
The analyis is that with the new secretary of DHS being confirmed, with the obama administration directing full disclosure, either the us customs and border protection agency have a lot of time on their hands or that they are trying to bump up their statistics to allow them to operate without disclosure. It could obviouly be a misunderstanding or fault of the passengers but more than 1 incident in recent weeks indicate some sort of pattern.
trekkie is offline  
Old Jan 26, 2009 | 3:40 pm
  #69  
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 628
Originally Posted by trekkie
Such events are normally meant to eb rare occurance, not the norm.
Originally Posted by trekkie
It could obviouly be a misunderstanding or fault of the passengers but more than 1 incident in recent weeks indicate some sort of pattern.
I'm not sure I know what you are referring to by "such events". Do you mean a person being refused admission to the United States despite holding a valid visa? It happens all the time. It's not rare at all. And there really is nothing in the account of the Rabbi family to suggest they were mistreated. They were given food and drink at the airport and then transferred to a detention facility (where they could get real meals and some sleep) until the next flight on which they could be returned. Sounds fair to me.
Deeg is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.