How many injuries caused by the screening process?
#1
Original Poster




Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: DCA / WAS
Programs: DL 2+ million/PM, YX, Marriott Plt, *wood gold, HHonors, CO Plt, UA, AA EXP, WN, AGR
Posts: 9,386
How many injuries caused by the screening process?
Came thorough AMS yesterday on the way back from Prague.
DL opened the gate for screening an hour-and-ten-minutes before the flight was to leave - I arrived within minutes after it opened and found a line 50 feet long down the concourse. Fortunately, they had a business class access line (no one waiting) that skipped the regular line. Inside the roped-off-interview area there were another 30+ people that had been interviewed and were then lined up for the x-ray. Although 2 screening stations are installed, AMS and Delta were only operating ONE (for an oversold 767). In fact, it was so crowded and hot that they weren't even bringing in folks for the inane interviews until the line moved a bit (about a 3 minute wait for me, longer for Y).
Once I was interviewed, I got into the snaking line for the lone operating x-ray/WTMD. Frustrating because of the US "shoes off" edict, yet most European passengers are used to being able to leave shoes on. It was VERY hot in the line area, and it was moving excruciatingly slowly (15 minutes+). There was nowhere to sit inside the roped off area.
As we reached the x-ray, the passenger ahead of me fainted and went down, splitting her head open (blood on the floor). Apparently she'd been in line 25 minutes (before and after the interview) and at one point asked where she could sit, and was told she couldn't. Likewise, she was denied a request for water before going down (can't be too safe, can we?). The security folks didn't move for about 30 seconds, then were more concerned about making sure no passenger got inside the ropes as opposed to helping the woman. At least her companion was there to help.
Meanwhile, the (classy) folks behind me said "step over her or go around".
(and it wasn't even a flight to JFK
)
Finally got through the line in 20 minutes. Delta made us exchange our boarding passes (issued by Skyteam partner Czech Airlines for the DL flights)... before they'd load the checked bags.
I did later see the woman who went down sitting in the boarding area being tended to. I hope she got on the flight...
Leaves me wondering how many people need to get injured or hurt because of the screening process and the lack of efficiency on the part of the airlines & government/airport screening authorities.
DL opened the gate for screening an hour-and-ten-minutes before the flight was to leave - I arrived within minutes after it opened and found a line 50 feet long down the concourse. Fortunately, they had a business class access line (no one waiting) that skipped the regular line. Inside the roped-off-interview area there were another 30+ people that had been interviewed and were then lined up for the x-ray. Although 2 screening stations are installed, AMS and Delta were only operating ONE (for an oversold 767). In fact, it was so crowded and hot that they weren't even bringing in folks for the inane interviews until the line moved a bit (about a 3 minute wait for me, longer for Y).
Once I was interviewed, I got into the snaking line for the lone operating x-ray/WTMD. Frustrating because of the US "shoes off" edict, yet most European passengers are used to being able to leave shoes on. It was VERY hot in the line area, and it was moving excruciatingly slowly (15 minutes+). There was nowhere to sit inside the roped off area.
As we reached the x-ray, the passenger ahead of me fainted and went down, splitting her head open (blood on the floor). Apparently she'd been in line 25 minutes (before and after the interview) and at one point asked where she could sit, and was told she couldn't. Likewise, she was denied a request for water before going down (can't be too safe, can we?). The security folks didn't move for about 30 seconds, then were more concerned about making sure no passenger got inside the ropes as opposed to helping the woman. At least her companion was there to help.
Meanwhile, the (classy) folks behind me said "step over her or go around".
)Finally got through the line in 20 minutes. Delta made us exchange our boarding passes (issued by Skyteam partner Czech Airlines for the DL flights)... before they'd load the checked bags.
I did later see the woman who went down sitting in the boarding area being tended to. I hope she got on the flight...
Leaves me wondering how many people need to get injured or hurt because of the screening process and the lack of efficiency on the part of the airlines & government/airport screening authorities.
#2
Suspended
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 4,953
Allegedly there was the woman who suffered fractures because some screener made her remove her walking cast.
While I don't know of any others, I am certain that there must be a lot of people with back, hip, etc. conditions that are aggravated by having to stand in a long line creating more pain than would otherwise be normal.
I, for one, can walk all day if I move at a good clip but I can't stand in place or move slowly for more than about 5 minutes before my back starts to act up.
While I don't know of any others, I am certain that there must be a lot of people with back, hip, etc. conditions that are aggravated by having to stand in a long line creating more pain than would otherwise be normal.
I, for one, can walk all day if I move at a good clip but I can't stand in place or move slowly for more than about 5 minutes before my back starts to act up.
#3




Join Date: May 2005
Location: various cities in the USofA: NYC, BWI, IAH, ORD, CVG, NYC
Programs: Former UA 1K, National Exec. Elite
Posts: 5,487
I'd bet there are tens or hundreds of thousands of foot fungus infections, as well as other infections, that can be blamed on the shoes-off policy. I would suggest that 50% of TSO's working the screening area be selected to work in socks for a month to see the effect on the rate of such infections. Of course, since the TSA's raison d'etre is the perception of safety, not actual safety, such a study would be counterproductive.
Of course it's probably a violation of workplace safety rules to require TSA employees to work in socks. The implied message is a nice #@*& you; we don't give a rodent's hind quarter about public health or passenger safety from the TSA to to the traveling public.
Of course it's probably a violation of workplace safety rules to require TSA employees to work in socks. The implied message is a nice #@*& you; we don't give a rodent's hind quarter about public health or passenger safety from the TSA to to the traveling public.
#5
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Somewhere near BWI
Programs: DL DM, HH Dia, SPG Gold, MR Plat, Hertz PC
Posts: 3,654
#6
Join Date: Jan 2008
Programs: I work for the TSA
Posts: 848
I'd bet there are tens or hundreds of thousands of foot fungus infections, as well as other infections, that can be blamed on the shoes-off policy.

I went through a checkpoint in my lil sock feet 4-5 days a week (sometimes multiple times in a day) for more than a year with no ill effects. Have never had a passenger tell me they contracted any sort of ailment from our floors.
The human body is remarkably resistant to disease!
Also, keep in mind that if you wear your shoes in your house, you're transporting microscopic particles of anything you stepped in outdoors -- including bacteria, germs and most likely bird or animal feces -- to your floors and carpeting.
I'll bet most people who complain about TSA's "shoes-off" rule don't think twice about wearing their shoes in the house and then walking barefoot on the same contaminated carpets!
Last edited by oneofthosepeopleyouloveto hate; Dec 22, 2008 at 6:27 pm
#7
Suspended
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 4,953
Or we could blame it on the passengers' lack of foresight. A clear plastic disposal baggie can be slipped over the foot to create a sanitary barrier, and probably costs less than a nickel. 
I went through a checkpoint in my lil sock feet 4-5 days a week (sometimes multiple times in a day) for more than a year with no ill effects. Have never had a passenger tell me they contracted any sort of ailment from our floors.
The human body is remarkably resistant to disease!
Also, keep in mind that if you wear your shoes in your house, you're transporting microscopic particles of anything you stepped in outdoors -- including bacteria, germs and most likely bird or animal feces -- to your floors and carpeting.
I'll bet most people who complain about TSA's "shoes-off" rule don't think twice about wearing their shoes in the house and then walking barefoot on the same contaminated carpets!

I went through a checkpoint in my lil sock feet 4-5 days a week (sometimes multiple times in a day) for more than a year with no ill effects. Have never had a passenger tell me they contracted any sort of ailment from our floors.
The human body is remarkably resistant to disease!
Also, keep in mind that if you wear your shoes in your house, you're transporting microscopic particles of anything you stepped in outdoors -- including bacteria, germs and most likely bird or animal feces -- to your floors and carpeting.
I'll bet most people who complain about TSA's "shoes-off" rule don't think twice about wearing their shoes in the house and then walking barefoot on the same contaminated carpets!
I believe another FTer has stats on what types of bacteria have been found on the floors/carpeting at checkpoints.
I have a family member who had MRSA. When we were talking to the infectious disease specialist I specifically asked if he could link any bacterial infections to airport checkpoints and the forced removal of shoes. While he said he could not as he'd never done any studies, he was certain that there would be cases that could be traced to the TSA's requirements, especially in individuals who have compromised immune systems.
#8




Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: North of DFW
Programs: AA PLT, HH Gold, TSA Disparager Gold, going for Platnium
Posts: 1,535
Really, i really beg to differ, but then again i have posted this more then once, and other sanitary issues about TSA including gloves. A little search goes a long way.
#9
FlyerTalk Evangelist




Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Chicago
Programs: AA EXP
Posts: 11,969
I'm glad to hear that someone else has this problem. I was told that I was just plain nuts for saying that it hurts me to walk slowly.
#10
FlyerTalk Evangelist




Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Chicago
Programs: AA EXP
Posts: 11,969
I felt like such an idiot when I went to take my shoes off in Athens when they told me "we don't do that here" or in FRA or many other places.
It is just harassment by DHS and TSA.
#11


Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Nashua, NH USA
Programs: Seashore Trolley Museum "flight attendant"
Posts: 2,015
In later years I ceased that practice as I became a "consultant" and wished to maintain a more professional appearance. I was now one of the few wearing a good shirt and necktie. Except I would occasionally wear such things as Hawaiian shirts and shorts on Fridays.
Does fainting occur so fast that one doesn't have a chance to squat down or kneel down before falling?
#12
There are literally millions of Americans (probably everywhere, but I mainly practice medicine in the US) with chronic back problems who can't stand for long periods of time, though many can walk much farther/longer. Also many people with ENT problems like Meniere's disease, or abnormalities of the cerebellum in the brain will have problems with balance and often with prolonged standing.
I've traveled home to Seattle through Amsterdam on KLM and Northwest and have endured the endless security screening lines, but they weren't forcing the shoe carnival as recently as last May. Is it a DL thing? OTOH, just returned from TLV through ATL on DL, and they didn't require the shoe carnival in TLV. However, they wouldn't let us buy any liquids over "3 ounces" at Duty Free, even if we promised to put it in checked baggage once in ATL.
Consistent inconsistency to keep us fooled.
I've traveled home to Seattle through Amsterdam on KLM and Northwest and have endured the endless security screening lines, but they weren't forcing the shoe carnival as recently as last May. Is it a DL thing? OTOH, just returned from TLV through ATL on DL, and they didn't require the shoe carnival in TLV. However, they wouldn't let us buy any liquids over "3 ounces" at Duty Free, even if we promised to put it in checked baggage once in ATL.
Consistent inconsistency to keep us fooled.
#13




Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: North of DFW
Programs: AA PLT, HH Gold, TSA Disparager Gold, going for Platnium
Posts: 1,535
Depends sometimes yes, but for the most part: no, this depends on the person mainly. I have passed out a few times and all but 3 times was i able to get in a brace position so as to not injure myself, but this is only because i was aware something was going on and had time to prepare. Last time i went from fine to being passed out in less then 15 seconds due to the pain I was in.
#14




Join Date: May 2005
Location: various cities in the USofA: NYC, BWI, IAH, ORD, CVG, NYC
Programs: Former UA 1K, National Exec. Elite
Posts: 5,487
If it's so easy, why doesn't the TSA do its part to protect the very people it's supposedly protecting and give out foot freedom baggies?
In the end it's the fact that it would [probably] be illegal to require TSA employees to work without shoes that says the most: it's not the passengers that are being protected.
#15
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,015
Are we talking about PHYSICAL injuries to PAX? A finite number. PHYSICAL injuries to SCREENERS? Again, a finite number. MENTAL injuries to both? Hmmm. Dunno. I'm still outraged by what I know was a crime done to me by TSA four years ago, and that isn't like me at all, believe it or not. Wonder if any screeners emerge from their career as mentally changed individuals, as well. I just betcha they do.
Now, then. Injuries to the Constitution of the U.S.A. caused by the screening process?
Too late. Irrecoverable, I'm afraid.
However, if you believe in the IMPLIED Constitution (see Implied Consent), why, then TSA is STILL your smiling pal and will lead you all the way to the edge of the gangplank, and as you and your country slowly drown there will be scant sign of injury or outcry.
Now, then. Injuries to the Constitution of the U.S.A. caused by the screening process?
Too late. Irrecoverable, I'm afraid.
However, if you believe in the IMPLIED Constitution (see Implied Consent), why, then TSA is STILL your smiling pal and will lead you all the way to the edge of the gangplank, and as you and your country slowly drown there will be scant sign of injury or outcry.



