Community
Wiki Posts
Search

How many TSO's does it take.....

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 14, 2008 | 4:30 pm
  #1  
Original Poster
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
1M
50 Countries Visited
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 72,266
How many TSO's does it take.....

..... to look at the X-ray display?

I was in San Diego earlier this week, and was treated to yet another demonstration of TSA incompetence.

In Terminal 1 at around noon, and only two of the five (or six?) lanes were open, which wouldn't have been a problem had the TSO's not been so clueless.

The operator of one of the baggage screening machines saw something she couldn't identify, so she called for a colleague. After a few intense minutes, the two called for a third colleague to come over. After a few more intense minutes, they called for a fourth. Amazingly, no one just said "hey, let's take it out of the machine and look through the bag!" And of course, the line, which had been virtually nonexistent, grew and grew.

Way to go, San Diego TSA. Inconvenience passengers because none of your screeners have enough common sense to take a bag out the X-ray machine and look through it off to the side. Simply brilliant.
halls120 is online now  
Old Sep 14, 2008 | 5:05 pm
  #2  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Programs: I work for the TSA
Posts: 848
Actually, if it appears there's a bomb in the bag, we would follow a different protocol rather than taking it out of the machine, jiggling it around and possibility detonating it.

That's called "cautious" -- another way of saying SMART!
oneofthosepeopleyouloveto hate is offline  
Old Sep 14, 2008 | 5:25 pm
  #3  
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: BNA
Posts: 2,076
Originally Posted by oneofthosepeopleyouloveto hate
Actually, if it appears there's a bomb in the bag, we would follow a different protocol rather than taking it out of the machine, jiggling it around and possibility detonating it.

That's called "cautious" -- another way of saying SMART!
If jiggling it around were going to detonate it, wouldn't it have happened by then? I don't know, just asking. Does it really take more than one or two people though? That's not called cautious, it's called poor training and ineptitude. Another victory for minimum competency hiring standards.
chuckd is offline  
Old Sep 14, 2008 | 5:45 pm
  #4  
Original Poster
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
1M
50 Countries Visited
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 72,266
Originally Posted by oneofthosepeopleyouloveto hate
Actually, if it appears there's a bomb in the bag, we would follow a different protocol rather than taking it out of the machine, jiggling it around and possibility detonating it.

That's called "cautious" -- another way of saying SMART!
If it had been suspected of being a bomb, the terminal would have been cleared.

What I witnessed was nothing more than TSO ineptitude, no matter how hard you try to spin it.
halls120 is online now  
Old Sep 14, 2008 | 5:56 pm
  #5  
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 90
Originally Posted by halls120
If it had been suspected of being a bomb, the terminal would have been cleared.

What I witnessed was nothing more than TSO ineptitude, no matter how hard you try to spin it.
You're tax dollers at work.
quantas4me is offline  
Old Sep 14, 2008 | 9:56 pm
  #6  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
10 Countries Visited500k30 Nights20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: BWI
Programs: AA Gold, HH Diamond, National Emerald Executive, TSA Disparager Gold
Posts: 15,180
Originally Posted by oneofthosepeopleyouloveto hate
Actually, if it appears there's a bomb in the bag, we would follow a different protocol rather than taking it out of the machine, jiggling it around and possibility detonating it.

That's called "cautious" -- another way of saying SMART!
Ah yes, the Abundance of Caution. Caution apparently doesn't equal smarts, else TSA would be a much better run organization and would actually catch real threats to aviation.
Superguy is offline  
Old Sep 14, 2008 | 10:54 pm
  #7  
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: (insert city name here) hotel
Programs: AA - ExPlat 1MM Marriott - Platinum, Hertz - Presidents Circle
Posts: 483
Originally Posted by halls120
..... to look at the X-ray display?
7...At least that's how many it took last Monday AM in DEN.
purpleskiesfly is offline  
Old Sep 15, 2008 | 5:29 am
  #8  
Original Poster
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
1M
50 Countries Visited
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 72,266
Originally Posted by purpleskiesfly
7...At least that's how many it took last Monday AM in DEN.
I guess I was lucky in San Diego that it was just four vigilant employees.
halls120 is online now  
Old Sep 15, 2008 | 5:53 am
  #9  
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Upstate NY or FL or inbetween
Programs: US former CP Looking for a new airline to love me
Posts: 1,694
Originally Posted by oneofthosepeopleyouloveto hate
Actually, if it appears there's a bomb in the bag, we would follow a different protocol rather than taking it out of the machine, jiggling it around and possibility detonating it.

That's called "cautious" -- another way of saying SMART!
So the protocol if it looks like it's potentially explosive is to gather more TSO's into the blast zone adjacent to where the device is? Sure hope not!

Last edited by NY-FLA; Sep 15, 2008 at 9:27 am Reason: No change
NY-FLA is offline  
Old Sep 15, 2008 | 7:32 am
  #10  
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Seat 0A
Posts: 350
Originally Posted by NY-FLA
So the protocol if it looks like it's potentially explosive is to gather more TSO's into the blast zone adjacent to where the device is?
Perzactly -- bait the first-responders & take 'em out. It's right in the tewwowists SOP handbook.
While they're all gazing at the shiny gold thingy, the next guy in line pulls HIS detonator-pin.

The more you know.
squawk7500 is offline  
Old Sep 15, 2008 | 9:47 am
  #11  
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Indian Harbour Beach, Fla, USA
Programs: AA Lifetime Plt
Posts: 1,986
Originally Posted by NY-FLA
So the protocol if it looks like it's potentially explosive is to gather more TSO's into the blast zone adjacent to where the device is?
Spiff would like that.
greggwiggins is offline  
Old Sep 15, 2008 | 9:56 am
  #12  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Doha, Qatar
Programs: Air Canada Aeroplan, Lufthansa Miles & More, Flying Blue, Hyatt Gold Passport
Posts: 1,894
Originally Posted by NY-FLA
So the protocol if it looks like it's potentially explosive is to gather more TSO's into the blast zone adjacent to where the device is? Sure hope not!
You don't? Why not? If one goes off, they can give them all posthumous Darwin awards for doing their part to keep stupid genes out of the gene pool.
polonius is offline  
Old Sep 15, 2008 | 10:05 am
  #13  
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Upstate NY or FL or inbetween
Programs: US former CP Looking for a new airline to love me
Posts: 1,694
Originally Posted by polonius
You don't? Why not? If one goes off, they can give them all posthumous Darwin awards for doing their part to keep stupid genes out of the gene pool.
Because if TSA's explosive looking thingy response strategy was that flawed, then I'd lose all my faith in the war on water, any liquids, shoes, cargo pants and whatever else we're warring on this week....
NY-FLA is offline  
Old Sep 15, 2008 | 10:30 am
  #14  
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Portland, OR
Programs: DL MM Gold
Posts: 1,688
Originally Posted by NY-FLA
... I'd lose all my faith in the war.....
Hehe. For very small values of residual faith ....
TheRoadie is offline  
Old Sep 16, 2008 | 6:22 pm
  #15  
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: ORD
Programs: CO PLT, HH DIA
Posts: 1,461
Originally Posted by halls120
If it had been suspected of being a bomb, the terminal would have been cleared.

What I witnessed was nothing more than TSO ineptitude, no matter how hard you try to spin it.

Yeah, isn't where they shout "BRAVO!!!" at the top of their lungs and all activity, right down to the molecular level, stops instantly? Saw it happen in PHX one day...

--PP
VideoPaul is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.