Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Missing Air Marshalls

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 28, 2008 | 9:20 pm
  #31  
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 4,704
Originally Posted by alanR
Still doesn't affect the fact that at most only 1 in 20 aircraft have someone who even capable of firing a gun, let alone being able to take action that will prevent the successful hijacking

If I was al-Qaeda I'd be pretty confident of being able to put a hole through any building in the US at a time of my choosing

Not exactly a glowing recommendation for having FAMs on flights
That's an indictment, if anything, of execution instead of principle, because if there were more then that rationale would be nonexistent.

Of course I'd argue most flights don't need FAMs. Puddle-jumper flights are probably not high on the list for AQ.
law dawg is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.