Sensible security at Sapporo
Feb 10, 2008 | 3:58 am
#1
Original Poster
Join Date: Aug 2007
Programs: QF LTG:
Posts: 1,865
Sensible security at Sapporo
Flew from Sapporo to Hiroshima this afternoon. Had two bottles of water in my backpack pockets. After having to be wanded for setting off the metal detector (no idea but it wasn't too intrusive and the staff apologised for the delay).
I was then asked, very politely, if the guard may examine my water bottles. Certainly said I, she then placed the bottle on top of a machine and it flashed ok. It had bottle sized grooves in it and took seconds. Again a thank you and have a safe trip.
Now, as otiose as the water checking is if they have to do it then this is the way to do it.
Also, no id was needed at all, just my Qantas club card to check in. Too simple and no dramas.
I was then asked, very politely, if the guard may examine my water bottles. Certainly said I, she then placed the bottle on top of a machine and it flashed ok. It had bottle sized grooves in it and took seconds. Again a thank you and have a safe trip.
Now, as otiose as the water checking is if they have to do it then this is the way to do it.
Also, no id was needed at all, just my Qantas club card to check in. Too simple and no dramas.
Feb 10, 2008 | 8:54 am
#2
Join Date: Jan 2006
Programs: SAS Eurobonus - Blue / Emirates Skywards - Blue
Posts: 637
Japanese Domestic Security is an absolute charm compared to the ruckus of flying internationally. There are never any queues and you're through within minutes unlike US airports. The staff are always polite and charming and you're never treated like the enemy like some TSA agents do.
As for the water thing, I mentioned this before on another thread. Seems it won't be making it's way to International flights. It's exclusively for domestic Japanese flights. I'd love to know how it works...
-mrploddy
As for the water thing, I mentioned this before on another thread. Seems it won't be making it's way to International flights. It's exclusively for domestic Japanese flights. I'd love to know how it works...
-mrploddy
Feb 10, 2008 | 9:38 am
#3
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Seattle, WA (ex Tokyo, JP)
Programs: A3*G, DL Platinum
Posts: 871
Heck, when I flew up to CTS last weekend from HND my JL-issued boarding passes didn't even have my name on them. The tour company had a whole pile of boarding passes and just counted them off for folks. I presume they would be on the hook to give JL names should something happen. There's no way they could implement ID checking even if they wanted to.
When I paid 1,000 JPY to upgrade to Class-J, the JL staff needed my name so that they could create a real booking. But even then the boarding pass didn't have my name on it.
Security over here is really sensible.
When I paid 1,000 JPY to upgrade to Class-J, the JL staff needed my name so that they could create a real booking. But even then the boarding pass didn't have my name on it.
Security over here is really sensible.
Feb 10, 2008 | 9:59 am
#4
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: NRT
Programs: Tokyo Monorail Diamond-Encrusted-Platinum
Posts: 10,045
"Thank you. Please proceed. Although what's the point of saying this since you don't understand a word I'm saying."
... all with a charming smile.
I believe she's now aware that some thoughts are best left unvoiced.
Feb 11, 2008 | 9:50 pm
#6
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: BWI
Programs: AA Gold, HH Diamond, National Emerald Executive, TSA Disparager Gold
Posts: 15,180
Feb 11, 2008 | 9:50 pm
#7
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: BWI
Programs: AA Gold, HH Diamond, National Emerald Executive, TSA Disparager Gold
Posts: 15,180
Feb 12, 2008 | 9:04 am
#10
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Munich, Germany
Programs: Miles&More Blue, SPG Silver
Posts: 3,452
It checks the water content of the liquid. The theory behind is that every dangerous liquid explosive has a low water content. So liquids with a high water percentage are harmless. The machine somehow can identify the water percentage. I think it uses some kind of microwaves.
Feb 12, 2008 | 9:55 am
#11
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Chicago
Posts: 11,667
It checks the water content of the liquid. The theory behind is that every dangerous liquid explosive has a low water content. So liquids with a high water percentage are harmless. The machine somehow can identify the water percentage. I think it uses some kind of microwaves.
Feb 12, 2008 | 11:02 am
#13
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: PSM
Posts: 69,232
It makes sense that an ultrasound or some other radio-based density check would be pretty accurate. Of course, since the TSA has some special secret crazy liquid threat other than the binary bomb that they can't tell us about, they can't let on that it isn't water based or we might be able to figure out how to make one and get it on a plane
Too bad this will never make it here
Feb 12, 2008 | 11:05 am
#14
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: LAX/TPE
Programs: United 1K, JAL Sapphire, SPG Lifetime Platinum, National Executive Elite, Hertz PC, Avis PC
Posts: 47,175
There are devices which can look at the chemical composition of a liquid inside a bottle and actually find the presence and amounts of specific chemicals. These devices are used in lab settings and have been available for years before the war on liquids started.
They are not expensive, easy to deploy and the technology could be added to an existing carry-on scanner - no sample prep necessary, all you need to do is drop your bottles in a bin so the scanner has a clear view of them and you're done.
The TSA has shown gross imcompetence by not even testing such a device because it's easier for them to just say "no liquids allowed!" than it is for them to actually do something to mitigate the threat.
They are not expensive, easy to deploy and the technology could be added to an existing carry-on scanner - no sample prep necessary, all you need to do is drop your bottles in a bin so the scanner has a clear view of them and you're done.
The TSA has shown gross imcompetence by not even testing such a device because it's easier for them to just say "no liquids allowed!" than it is for them to actually do something to mitigate the threat.
Feb 12, 2008 | 1:09 pm
#15
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: Alexandria, VA, USA NW Platinum Elite Since 1999, United GoldMM, Hyatt Discoverist, SPG Gold, Hilton Diamond, Hertz #1 Gold, IC Ambassador
Posts: 7,451
Actually the Japanese have been using this technology for a number of years, I remember ~5 years ago or so when I was flying out of KIX and they asked to see my water bottle, put on the scanner, pressed the buttong, got the green light and I was on my way...
I was thru the "Premium Lane" (Intl) at NRT last year and they did have one there as well...
But this is something that Skelator and his minions don't believe in, gotta use the Fear Factor and intimidation to get things across... another reason i LOVE transiting Japan.
I was thru the "Premium Lane" (Intl) at NRT last year and they did have one there as well...
But this is something that Skelator and his minions don't believe in, gotta use the Fear Factor and intimidation to get things across... another reason i LOVE transiting Japan.