FlyerTalk Forums

FlyerTalk Forums (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/index.php)
-   Practical Travel Safety and Security Issues (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/practical-travel-safety-security-issues-686/)
-   -   Amtrak and ID (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/practical-travel-safety-security-issues/737079-amtrak-id.html)

oneant Sep 18, 2007 1:09 am


Originally Posted by LLM (Post 8420619)
My older son was not permitted to board an Amtrak train at Union Station in Los Angeles this March without ID. He scrounged around Skid Row and got on Greyhound. The younger one has never been allowed on the northbound trains from Solana Beach without ID.

Seems a bit daft. If you can legally board an airplane without ID, why should you not be legally allowed to take a train. From a security standpoint, what the hell can a train do?

Brattflyer Sep 18, 2007 4:11 am


Foreshadows of the mark of the beast. Details in Revelation chapter 13 especially verses 16-18 also chapter 14 verses 9-11 et al
Completely off topic, but I saw a guy wearing a T shirt the other day that said "667 Neighbor of the beast!'

FliesWay2Much Sep 18, 2007 6:12 am


We are well on the way to the day when it will be illegal to lose your ID or have your ID stolen.
Substitute "Communist Party Membership Card" for "ID" and you will accurately describe life in the former Soviet Union. Heaven help you if you lost your card.

LLM Sep 18, 2007 9:20 am


Originally Posted by oneant (Post 8420777)
Seems a bit daft. If you can legally board an airplane without ID, why should you not be legally allowed to take a train. From a security standpoint, what the hell can a train do?

Why would you think TSA guidelines are based on anything rational?

fairviewroad Sep 18, 2007 11:09 am


Originally Posted by essxjay (Post 8419662)
I wish I was as sanguine about that as it sounds. :(

Well, I've been to Mexico twice, and in both cases I've entered legally on foot and in neither case did I have to present ID.

I'm just pointing out that the idea that you need ID to legally leave the country is a fallacy. The problem is that when you leave this country, you are entering another country, which generally requires documentation to do so. That is not the fault of the United States government, as such.

However, this is not universally true as anyone who's crossed into Mexico knows. If you want to return to the US, you will need ID. But the United States is not a prison. You are free to leave at anytime...no ID required.

oneant Sep 18, 2007 11:14 am


Originally Posted by LLM (Post 8422220)
Why would you think TSA guidelines are based on anything rational?

From what's been said here, the Amtrak rules are NOT TSA rules.

bitburgr Sep 18, 2007 11:21 am


Originally Posted by oneant (Post 8422974)
From what's been said here, the Amtrak rules are NOT TSA rules.

But onboard trains, the announcement is that they are complying with TSA regulations to do random ID checks (uh oh...or do they say "Federal Regulations"...now I'm not sure).

essxjay Sep 18, 2007 11:27 am


Originally Posted by fairviewroad (Post 8422944)
I'm just pointing out that the idea that you need ID to legally leave the country is a fallacy.

My comment was not directed at the facts of your statement, but about the fact distinctions have to be made about which modes of transborder crossing we're talking about.


The problem is that when you leave this country, you are entering another country, which generally requires documentation to do so. That is not the fault of the United States government, as such.
Of course, but let's back up to the moment while both feet are on U.S. soil ...


However, this is not universally true as anyone who's crossed into Mexico knows. If you want to return to the US, you will need ID.
]

Of course. I don't think anyone is challenging that here.


But the United States is not a prison. You are free to leave at anytime...no ID required.
By commerical air, ID is now (or will finally be) mandatory for travel even to US protectorates. Another proposal is to deny exit to those with outstanding child support payments. Several recent threads detail the hows and whys of this proposal. Not a de facto prison, but where do the stipulations stop?

To suggest that one is free to leave at anytime is just not the case.

ralfp Sep 18, 2007 11:50 am


Originally Posted by fairviewroad (Post 8419568)
As for the janitor comment...that isn't strictly true, because the policy says you only have to produce ID for Amtrak employees "on board trains". Amtrak trains do not have janitors, as such.

But they do have cleaning and maintenance staff that are sometimes aboard trains at the same time as passengers.


Originally Posted by Brattflyer (Post 8421064)
Completely off topic, but I saw a guy wearing a T shirt the other day that said "667 Neighbor of the beast!'

That would be across the street.

fairviewroad Sep 18, 2007 12:06 pm


Originally Posted by essxjay (Post 8423045)
My comment was not directed at the facts of your statement, but about the fact distinctions have to be made about which modes of transborder crossing we're talking about.

Sorry, I didn't mean to suggest you disputed this. I was originally responding to Post #10, wherein the poster alleged you need an ID to leave the country. A lot of people seem to think this is true, and I was simply pointing out that it is not.

fairviewroad Sep 18, 2007 12:18 pm


Originally Posted by essxjay (Post 8423045)
By commerical air, ID is now (or will finally be) mandatory for travel even to US protectorates. Another proposal is to deny exit to those with outstanding child support payments. Several recent threads detail the hows and whys of this proposal. Not a de facto prison, but where do the stipulations stop?

To suggest that one is free to leave at anytime is just not the case.

Actually, I disagree. Please name a time of day/week/year that a United States citizen who is not currently incarcerated is not free to leave.

Now, if that citizen lives in Salina, Kansas they may have a few logistical obstacles, yes. But they are, strictly speaking, perfectly free to walk/hitchhike/bike to the border and leave, and no ID is required.

I will grant you that people living in Alaska or Hawaii will encounter additional obstacles. But since flying domestically without ID is still possible, as outlined elsewhere on FT, it is techinically possible for them as well.

LLM Sep 18, 2007 12:23 pm


Originally Posted by oneant (Post 8422974)
From what's been said here, the Amtrak rules are NOT TSA rules.

Amtrak has undertaken heightened security measures for the benefit of our customers.

Valid Photo Identification Required

Photo ID Required
Amtrak customers 18 years of age and older must produce valid photo identification when:

Obtaining, exchanging, and refunding tickets
Storing baggage at stations
Checking baggage
Sending Amtrak Express shipments
Onboard trains, in response to a request by an Amtrak employee
Please note that unaccompanied children 15 and older must also produce valid photo ID when purchasing tickets.

Random Ticket/ID Checks
Following federal Transportation Security Administration (TSA) guidelines, we regularly conduct random ticket verification checks onboard trains to ensure that passengers are properly ticketed. Please be prepared to show valid photo identification to a member of the onboard crew upon request.

What is a Valid ID?
To be valid, your identification must be current and in-force. The following forms of identification are acceptable for persons 18 and older:

One piece of photo identification issued by a government authority, or
Two pieces of identification, at least one of which is a non-photo ID issued by a government authority
Examples of acceptable forms of ID include:

State or provincial driver's license
Passport
Official government-issued identification (federal, state or county government or legitimate foreign government)
Canadian provincial health card ID card with photo
Military photo ID
Student identification (university, college or high school photo ID)
Job Corps photo ID
Policy Regarding Ticket Purchase

Passengers purchasing tickets from station ticket agents or on board trains from conductors must provide photo identification and be at least 15 years old.

Passengers boarding at any staffed station or station with a Quik-Trak kiosk should purchase tickets prior to boarding the train.

Tickets purchased on board include a service fee built into the fare. This fee cannot be waived.

http://www.amtrak.com/servlet/Conten...=1080080554204

fairviewroad Sep 18, 2007 12:27 pm


Originally Posted by ralfp (Post 8423207)
But they do have cleaning and maintenance staff that are sometimes aboard trains at the same time as passengers.


:rolleyes:

I think that's a bit of a stretch. What you're saying is that during a station layover, when a member of the cleaning crew (or "janitor", to use your term) is briefly on board the train, that person would technically be authorized to demand you to produce an ID. Boy, that's just not something that's going to keep me up at night.

If anyone can cite an example of this actually happening, I'd love to hear about it. I'd wager that Amtrak internal policies actually forbid this, but I could be wrong.

asdca Sep 18, 2007 1:22 pm

I've found that by handing the conductor my ticket while wearing headphones and not making eye contect, I've never been asked for ID.

Global_Hi_Flyer Sep 18, 2007 1:25 pm

And I discovered the hard way that this "ID" policy extends to purchasing a $6 MARC ticket with cash either out of Union station or the BWI rail station.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 5:30 am.


This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.