Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Global Terrorism Database

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 25, 2007 | 8:50 am
  #1  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: BKK, MKE
Programs: DL DM,Marriott Plat
Posts: 241
Global Terrorism Database

Here's an interesting database I'd not seen mentioned before.
http://www.start.umd.edu/data/gtd/

Found a reference to it in Jerry Pournelle's View From Chaos Manor.
http://www.jerrypournelle.com/view/v....html#Thursday

From his Thursday entry he recounted a conversation with a DHS official. I'm sure there's quite of few us who would have appreciated a chance to bend this official's ear a bit. I think Jerry did a good job of articulating our concerns on the $'s wasted in the name of security theatre.
There was a fire drill today and I found myself outside next to an official in Airport and Aircraft security. I put it to him that Bin Laden never does the same things twice. On 9/11 we lost about $20 billion in buildings, and about 4 weekends worth of traffic casualties. Not a good thing, but the real disaster came when we then imposed about $40 billion a year in penalties on air travel and the airlines. We would be about as safe if we abolished the TSA and told the airlines that if they lose an airplane they better be insured against it. We would certainly be as safe against hijacked airplanes being flown into buildings as we are now. I also said that the main accomplishment of TSA is to make citizens feel like subjects.
dw8146 is offline  
Old May 25, 2007 | 9:49 pm
  #2  
Original Member
10 Countries Visited
100k
Community Influencer
25 Years on Site
 
Join Date: May 1998
Location: PDX
Programs: TSA Refusenik charter member
Posts: 16,126
Thanks for posting.

Check out this graphic: Terrorist Incidents by Perpetrator Type, 1998-2004.

WOW.

Last edited by essxjay; May 25, 2007 at 9:58 pm
essxjay is offline  
Old May 25, 2007 | 10:44 pm
  #3  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
5M
100 Countries Visited
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Between AUS, EWR, and YTO In a little twisty maze of airline seats, all alike.. but I wanna go home with the armadillo
Programs: CO, NW, & UA forum moderator emeritus. Eurobonus Millionaire
Posts: 38,648
Originally Posted by essxjay
Thanks for posting.

Check out this graphic: Terrorist Incidents by Perpetrator Type, 1998-2004.

WOW.
99.439% of statistics are made up. That's an interesting graphic, but we have no idea where the numbers come from or what exactly is being counted in there as a "terrorist incident."
Xyzzy is offline  
Old May 26, 2007 | 1:54 am
  #4  
Original Member
10 Countries Visited
100k
Community Influencer
25 Years on Site
 
Join Date: May 1998
Location: PDX
Programs: TSA Refusenik charter member
Posts: 16,126
Originally Posted by xyzzy
99.439% of statistics are made up. That's an interesting graphic, but we have no idea where the numbers come from or what exactly is being counted in there as a "terrorist incident."
Check the link in the OP for the methodology (I did. )
essxjay is offline  
Old May 26, 2007 | 9:25 am
  #5  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
5M
100 Countries Visited
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Between AUS, EWR, and YTO In a little twisty maze of airline seats, all alike.. but I wanna go home with the armadillo
Programs: CO, NW, & UA forum moderator emeritus. Eurobonus Millionaire
Posts: 38,648
Originally Posted by essxjay
Check the link in the OP for the methodology (I did. )
Ahh -- I hadn't tied the graphic in to the other links. Thanks. It certainly is interesting!
Xyzzy is offline  
Old May 28, 2007 | 10:59 am
  #6  
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 728
Originally Posted by essxjay
Thanks for posting.

Check out this graphic: Terrorist Incidents by Perpetrator Type, 1998-2004.

WOW.
LMAO at the "state-sponsored" category being near 0.

I guess they don't count the millions of people killed by state-sponsored wars, famines, etc. in that time period.
Texas_Dawg is offline  
Old May 28, 2007 | 4:22 pm
  #7  
Original Member
10 Countries Visited
100k
Community Influencer
25 Years on Site
 
Join Date: May 1998
Location: PDX
Programs: TSA Refusenik charter member
Posts: 16,126
Well, there is an epistemological distinction between terrorist strike and its fallout or secondary consequences that must be accounted for if their methodology is to be credible (and therefore, useful). :-:
essxjay is offline  
Old May 28, 2007 | 4:52 pm
  #8  
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 7,605
Originally Posted by essxjay
So 50%+ of all terrorist attacks are made by people who make no claims of responsibility & don't announce the cause they are fighting for.

Isn't that "odd"?
alanR is offline  
Old May 28, 2007 | 5:17 pm
  #9  
Original Member
10 Countries Visited
100k
Community Influencer
25 Years on Site
 
Join Date: May 1998
Location: PDX
Programs: TSA Refusenik charter member
Posts: 16,126
If you check the site, the explanation for the difference in methodology before 1998 and after explains the graph. Additionally, GTD2 (1998-2004 is in beta. @:-)
essxjay is offline  
Old May 29, 2007 | 1:34 pm
  #10  
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 4,704
Originally Posted by alanR
So 50%+ of all terrorist attacks are made by people who make no claims of responsibility & don't announce the cause they are fighting for.

Isn't that "odd"?
Or maybe they're dead and can't talk and multiple organizations take credit, making it indeterminable?
law dawg is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.