![]() |
Originally Posted by GUWonder
This is not a government that inspires confidence.
In all seriousnous though, these jihad websites will certainly continue to operate on the internet, regardless if one or two get shut down. It will just make them adapt to the changes. It is too easy and lucrative to hate America and the rest of the west now. How far we've come in 5 years. |
Sure terrorists use the Internet...
And terrorists use phone networks to communicate. The government did not find it necessary to advertise the fact that they were listening to terror (giving them the benefit of doubt) cells or that telephone traffic between operatives was a threat.
Why would they advertise the fact that the Internet is a threat and that it needs monitoring? :rolleyes: :rolleyes: And why now? :rolleyes: :rolleyes: The answer is not hard to guess but I'll leave it to you creative souls to arrive at it yourselves :D |
After Katrina, why is Mike Chertoff still even in office?
Doesn't Mike C. know that TALKING to poeple could be used to recruit terrorists? BOOKS could be used. Should be ban public places? Shut down printing presses? Ban Islam and close the mosques? Ban teachers from mentioning terrorism? Should we ban the Koran, the Torah, and the Bible? Why not ask a DHS representative to sit in my apartment and proofread each email I write and look over every web site I visit? Since they already have the phones tapped, this seems like a good idea. And the DHS budget is big enough to probably support it. In some ways, Chertoff's claim about the internet and Rumsfeld's NFL/dirty bomb schtik are good for the FlyerTalk cause. Their claims are so stupid that they help further destroy the last remaining modicum of credibility for the "War on Terror." |
Originally Posted by Superguy
Believe me, they're not ignoring it. That's all I'll say.
|
Originally Posted by Superguy
So what does Chertoff want? Web filtering at the national level like they have in China? :rolleyes:
|
Originally Posted by studentff
No-compute list. You will be required to present ID to the computer which will then allow login only if you are not on the list. You will be required to re-validate that ID every few minutes at random. David Nelson, Robert Johnson, and Sam Adams will have to go back to using snail mail. Politicians on both sides of the aisle and government officials will say it's OK to deny computer access without due process because there's no "right to use a computer" expressed in the Constitution. :rolleyes:
While sitting at your desk, you may not drink anything from a container that has more than three ounces of liquid in it. Mike |
"Good morning, Dave..." :)
|
Originally Posted by FliesWay2Much
"Good morning, Dave..." :)
|
Originally Posted by mikeef
Oh, it's much worse than that. Before getting on the internet, you will have to empty your pockets and remove all other electronic devices. In addition, you will have to take your shoes off.
While sitting at your desk, you may not drink anything from a container that has more than three ounces of liquid in it. Mike |
Originally Posted by Superguy
So what does Chertoff want? Web filtering at the national level like they have in China? :rolleyes:
http://eursoc.com/news/fullstory.php...Broadband.html |
Forgive me if my reading comprehension skills are lacking, but I got the sense from the linked article that Chertoff's concern was actually about homegrown terrorists. He was noting that disaffected people in-country could become radicalized and was allocating more resources to monitor that problem. He pointed out that training could take place over the internet as an example of how homegrown terrorists could be trained. His point seemed to be that terrorists don't have to be foreigners coming into this country - they could become radicalized and trained online. And, therefore, we need to devote more resources to the problem of homegrown terrorists.
I did not read anything in that particular article that suggested that Chertoff wanted to restrict Internet usage. |
Originally Posted by escog
I did not read anything in that particular article that suggested that Chertoff wanted to restrict Internet usage. Why would he behave any differently with respect to suspected local internet terrorism recruitment? |
Originally Posted by escog
Forgive me if my reading comprehension skills are lacking, but I got the sense from the linked article that Chertoff's concern was actually about homegrown terrorists. He was noting that disaffected people in-country could become radicalized and was allocating more resources to monitor that problem. He pointed out that training could take place over the internet as an example of how homegrown terrorists could be trained. His point seemed to be that terrorists don't have to be foreigners coming into this country - they could become radicalized and trained online. And, therefore, we need to devote more resources to the problem of homegrown terrorists.
I did not read anything in that particular article that suggested that Chertoff wanted to restrict Internet usage. |
Originally Posted by Travellin' Fool
MICROSOFT ANNOUNCES NEW SECURITY ENHANCEMENTS FOR WINDOWS DHS EDITION
:D :D |
Originally Posted by escog
I did not read anything in that particular article that suggested that Chertoff wanted to restrict Internet usage.
YET :eek: For those of us who have monitored Chertoff's assaults on liberty (before and during his secretaryship), we are concerned that this just might be the start of his thought process towards some kind of Italian-style internet license ('browsing pass' ?). Or worse. PS. Yes I know about C A R N I V O R E and E C H E L O N (hi guys !) and M A G I C L A N T E R N but I always wear a tinfoil hat while posting ;) |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:10 am. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.