Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Travel&Dining > Travel Safety/Security > Practical Travel Safety and Security Issues
Reload this Page >

3-4 hour security lines from here on- will you fly?

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

3-4 hour security lines from here on- will you fly?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 11, 2006 | 9:33 am
  #16  
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Salish Sea
Programs: DL,AC,HH,PC
Posts: 8,972
Originally Posted by kenaisteve
I remember right after 9/11 that the security wait time was hour(s), but people adapted and 6 months later the wait times decreased to 15-30 minutes, and recently it would take no more than 15 minutes except during rush hour.
My guess is that people will again adapt and that in a few months it will again drop to "reasonable" levels, maybe not 15 minutes again, but possibly 30 minutes.
And the people will have been conned into believing that the pre-8/10 procedures were indeed "reasonable", and will be grateful that the additional measures have been relaxed
Wally Bird is offline  
Old Aug 11, 2006 | 9:44 am
  #17  
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: SW WA
Posts: 4,061
I've already modified my behavior...I won't fly out of LAX unless absolutely necessary. Security lines before this happened were verging on 1.5 - 2 hours in some terminals there. The local news just showed people queuing up at 5:30 in the morning...they have been waiting in line outside the terminal for an hour and still haven't made it in, meaning the security line there is likely 2-3 hours.

I'm actually wondering if this will make things better -- most people they interviewed said they were not going to fly anymore (although their reasons largely weren't because of the lines, it was because they were afraid to fly).
Buster is offline  
Old Aug 11, 2006 | 9:45 am
  #18  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Washington, DC
Programs: UA MP, Marriott Rewards, Starwood Preferred, Hilton Honors
Posts: 160
Originally Posted by johnep1
Do you really believe lines will be 3-4 hours long from now on? Just because some journalist makes something up doesn't mean it's true.
I agree, but what journalists have you been reading or listening to? Everything I have been reading and watching on TV today has bene saying that security is moving smoothly and that things are running pretty much on time or with the usual traffic and weather delays...Now I am sure there are some places where things are bad, but the reporters I have seen at ORD, DCA, JFK, and EWR all have been saying people have been showing up early and prepared and that things are moving relatively smoothly given the circumstances.
Dave8481 is offline  
Old Aug 11, 2006 | 9:53 am
  #19  
3M
100 Nights
150 Countries Visited
25 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jan 1999
Location: Too many
Programs: Lots
Posts: 5,765
Much like shortly after 9/11, journalists are speculating like there's no tomorrow. I dont think you need to dig very hard to find these very same predictions of 4 hour security being "the norm" just 4.5 years ago.

The travel industry is a very large lobby, with a lot of $$$. Don't think they're willing to see their industry be destroyed by 4 hour security waits.
Axey is offline  
Old Aug 11, 2006 | 9:55 am
  #20  
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Dulles, VA
Programs: United Airlines 1 MM, Marriott Life Titanium
Posts: 2,777
Originally Posted by Dave8481
I just saw a live broadcast from O'Hare on CNBC and the reporter said the security lines were moving actually quite quickly and that things were running pretty much on time so far this morning...I haven't tried confirming this, but that is the word on CNBC.
Thats probably because every business traveler who could canceled their flights so they wouldn't have to deal with the silliness.
catocony is offline  
Old Aug 11, 2006 | 10:00 am
  #21  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: DEN
Programs: UA 1MM, Delta Plat
Posts: 11,224
Hogwash. It's temporary. I don't think it's going to be a matter of adapting, but many of these security measures will go away. If we reach the point where you can't take a watch on a flight, we're all toast. Nobody will stand for that, not even the apologists.

I went through security at SAN yesterday in 10 minutes. I was "scared," got to the airport 2 1/2 hours early, and spent 2 hours and 20 minutes in the RCC.
redbeard911 is offline  
Old Aug 11, 2006 | 10:15 am
  #22  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Watchlisted by the prejudiced, en route to purgatory
Programs: Just Say No to Fleecing and Blacklisting
Posts: 102,077
Originally Posted by redbeard911
Hogwash. It's temporary. I don't think it's going to be a matter of adapting, but many of these security measures will go away. If we reach the point where you can't take a watch on a flight, we're all toast. Nobody will stand for that, not even the apologists.

I went through security at SAN yesterday in 10 minutes. I was "scared," got to the airport 2 1/2 hours early, and spent 2 hours and 20 minutes in the RCC.
What isn't temporary in aviation security? It's just a matter of what lasts for hours, days, weeks, months, years, or decades.

Wouldn't 3-4 hour waits be the end of most non-major-metro area airports' service?
GUWonder is offline  
Old Aug 11, 2006 | 10:22 am
  #23  
Moderator, Omni, Omni/PR, Omni/Games, FlyerTalk Posting Legend
20 Countries Visited
1M
40 Nights
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Between DCA and IAD
Programs: UA 1K MM; Hilton Diamond
Posts: 72,649
I know I would pressure my job to eliminate travel, much as I enjoy having subsidized flying from them.

Leisure trips that were drivable would go away.

I would also no longer make MRs. And no long-distance trips that are for less than a week in duration (i.e. no three or four-day weekends on transcons, etc.)

Unfortunately, there will be plenty of Ma and Pa Kettles who simply walk down the well-traveled corridors into the valley of steel like the sheep they are and who will complain but say, "Well, at least it makes us safe."
exerda is offline  
Old Aug 11, 2006 | 12:46 pm
  #24  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
30 Countries Visited
3M
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: NY Metro Area
Programs: AA 2MM Yay!, UA MM, Costco General Member
Posts: 50,847
Originally Posted by Buster
I've already modified my behavior...I won't fly out of LAX unless absolutely necessary. Security lines before this happened were verging on 1.5 - 2 hours in some terminals there. The local news just showed people queuing up at 5:30 in the morning...they have been waiting in line outside the terminal for an hour and still haven't made it in, meaning the security line there is likely 2-3 hours.

I'm actually wondering if this will make things better -- most people they interviewed said they were not going to fly anymore (although their reasons largely weren't because of the lines, it was because they were afraid to fly).

Im at LAX now. I arrived a little bit ago from Sydney. I had a 75 minute connection and had it changed in Sydney after hearing about LAX issues. Got here and the only real wait was for my bag. Customs and immigration was smooth. Security at LAX was less than 5 minutes. Dont know about check in since i got my boarding pass in SYD.

Likewise SYD was smooth. I got there early and they were waiting with printed instructions on the new rules. I put any liquids in my suitcase and checked it. They were strict about one carry on. They did a secondary screening at the gate. They called the flight in the RCC about 90 minutes before departure for business class. Everyone got researched by hand at the gate. Both people and bags. But they had 8 or 10 people doing the searches and even on a sold out 744 it wasnt a bad wait.

Time will tell of course but there does seem to be some reasonable decisions and accomadations being made all around at the moment.

My only issue is that my contact lenses sure could have used some rewetting solution after 14 hours. Pulled it out after customs and put some in my eyes and then back in the bag before rechecking it.
GadgetFreak is offline  
Old Aug 11, 2006 | 1:00 pm
  #25  
Moderator: Coupon Connection & S.P.A.M
50 Countries Visited
5M
All eyes on you!
25 Years on Site
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Louisville, KY
Programs: Destination Unknown, TSA Disparager Diamond (LTDD)
Posts: 58,133
If the line takes 5 minutes but I still have to remove my shoes, cannot have liquids/gels and might get gate-harassed, then I will not fly.
Spiff is offline  
Old Aug 11, 2006 | 1:07 pm
  #26  
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: SJC, SFO, NYC
Programs: 1K, Hertz Five Star
Posts: 1,030
Thumbs up 8 minutes at PIT

No lines at checkin counter (Preferred)
Lines was 4 people deep at the regular desk - wait time 1 minute.

Checkin and baggage check = 2 minutes.

No line at TSA bag drop
Walk to bag drop, drop bag and leave = 1 minute

Elite line at security had 2 people (with a baby) in front
Getting past ID checker = 1 minute (because of family in front)

Second in line for screening
Removal of shoes ( ), laptop ( ) etc. = 2 minutes

WTMD, boarding pass check and gather up stuff = 1 minute

8 minutes - on my way.

This was at 2:15 P.M. on Friday.
bnarayan1511 is offline  
Old Aug 11, 2006 | 1:11 pm
  #27  
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: SJC, SFO, NYC
Programs: 1K, Hertz Five Star
Posts: 1,030
Talking

Originally Posted by redbeard911
...I went through security at SAN yesterday in 10 minutes. I was "scared," got to the airport 2 1/2 hours early, and spent 2 hours and 20 minutes in the RCC.

LOL - same here. Got here at 2:15 for a 5:55 departure (not entirely due to expectation of long wait - I got done with business early). Took only 8 minutes from the time I walked up to the counter till I was boarding the transit.

Entered US Club at 2:30. First time I've appreciated that they charge for drinks or for sure, they'd have denied me boarding later tonight.
bnarayan1511 is offline  
Old Aug 11, 2006 | 1:21 pm
  #28  
In memoriam
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: DAL
Programs: SWA A list preferred and CP, Hilton Lifetime Diamond, Hertz President's club
Posts: 9,803
Originally Posted by catocony
Thats probably because every business traveler who could canceled their flights so they wouldn't have to deal with the silliness.
Did you hurt yourself leaping the grand canyon on that one? I think you will find the number of business travellers who cancelled flights are a SMALL minority and those who pondered the idea isnt too many more. Most of us are used to the up and down of travel and roll with it, not to mention if we dont travel we dont get paid. I booked 3 new flights today...sure not sitting in a corner running scared or to avoid packing smarter.
Lehava is offline  
Old Aug 11, 2006 | 1:23 pm
  #29  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Conversation Starter
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Department of Homeland Sincerity
Programs: WN Platinum, UA 1k, AA EP, Marriott Plat
Posts: 12,319
Originally Posted by Lehava
Did you hurt yourself leaping the grand canyon on that one? I think you will find the number of business travellers who cancelled flights are a SMALL minority and those who pondered the idea isnt too many more. Most of us are used to the up and down of travel and roll with it, not to mention if we dont travel we dont get paid. I booked 3 new flights today...sure not sitting in a corner running scared or to avoid packing smarter.
before you troll further, try not to speak for others.

The overwhelming majority of people on this board agree with the person you just tried to troll.

Please, kindly do us a favor and go join the TSA.
UALOneKPlus is offline  
Old Aug 11, 2006 | 1:26 pm
  #30  
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: NYC/SYD
Programs: Virtuoso Travel Advisor. FSPP, Ritz STARS, Rosewood Elite, Belmond BelliniClub. SPG PRO
Posts: 2,445
Originally Posted by kenaisteve
I remember right after 9/11 that the security wait time was hour(s), but people adapted and 6 months later the wait times decreased to 15-30 minutes, and recently it would take no more than 15 minutes except during rush hour.
My guess is that people will again adapt and that in a few months it will again drop to "reasonable" levels, maybe not 15 minutes again, but possibly 30 minutes.
Perfect example to why this reaction from the idiots in TSA and such is a total waste of time. The terrorists didnt bother with anything after that Tuesday morning. They waited. Until that 6 months of hell for travelers who didnt do anything and werent in any extra danger had passed and then we relaxed to a more normal level. Well here they come again. They got caught (staged to more like it. Definition of terror isnt blowing things up. Its blowing up only enough to make them think you'll do it every time you threaten to. Makes the threats as effective) and now we're fine for some time. They'll adapt to another method.

The terrorists are MUCH smarter than GWB and the rest of the fools saying this is "for safety"
tenmoc is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.