Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Travel&Dining > Travel Safety/Security > Practical Travel Safety and Security Issues
Reload this Page >

Good Vanity Fair Article on Air Marshal Program: "In Plane Sight"

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Good Vanity Fair Article on Air Marshal Program: "In Plane Sight"

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 15, 2006 | 9:37 pm
  #1  
Original Poster
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Conversation Starter
All eyes on you!
25 Years on Site
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: أمريكا
Posts: 26,931
Good Vanity Fair Article on Air Marshal Program: "In Plane Sight"

This is a good and in-depth (relatively, considering how secret this program is) look at the Federal Air Marshal program. It highlights a number of practical and managerial problems.

It also features a quotation from a current marshal who says he's 100% certain that he could put together a team that could successfully attack a two person air marshal team and steal their weapons.

When a disturbed Home Depot paint salesman snapped aboard an American Airlines jet at Miami International Airport in early December, two casually-dressed men leapt from their seats and into the fray. In those frenzied moments before Rigoberto Alpizar was shot and killed, he may, in his confused state, never have realized that those men who were pointing guns at him, ordering him to get down and stop moving, were undercover federal air marshals.

The air marshals, by design, are a shadowy force, and until this incident they had been an increasingly neglected one. With the urgency in the wake of 9/11 long past, efforts to expand their ranks were shelved as too costly; theyve been plagued by management problems and poor morale; and within Homeland Security, their agency is treated as a stepchild.

And the shooting of Rigoberto Alpizar, justified or not, did nothing to answer very real questions about how air marshals would perform face-to-face with the deadly threat theyre trained to thwart. A real terrorist, after all, would never claim he had a bomb. Hed just use it.
On a heavy travel Sunday last year, I roamed Newark Liberty International Airport and watched for the many ways an air marshals most valuable asset anonymity can be compromised:

These plainclothes members of the Federal Air Marshal Service (FAMS) are not allowed to use most e-ticket kiosks, instead having to go to the ticket counter and show their conspicuously large badges.

Because theyre armed with a handgun, air marshals bypass metal detectors by going up the exit lane at the security checkpoint, in full view of passengers waiting on the entrance lines.

Marshals have to present their IDs a third time at the gate counter.

At least one marshal in a team boards even before first-class and passengers with small children or those needing assistance to meet the pilot and crew and inspect the plane for suspicious items. This could take place in the presence of airplane cleaners and food vendors.

By the time everyone else boards, the marshals are already in their seats.

At Newark that day, I sat near enough to one counter to lip-read a man say, Im an air marshal, as he pulled out his wallet and displayed his ID. He was in his mid-30s (as are about 60 percent of marshals; only 4 percent are women), with moderately short hair; he was wearing light khakis and a short black coat and carrying only a small over-the-shoulder bag. He boarded a minute before everyone else.

One air marshal I spoke to, on the condition that his identity not be revealed (with top-secret clearances, air marshals are forbidden to talk to the press), expressed anxiety about his cover being blown. Putting himself into the mind of a hijacker, he laid out this scenario:

I get on a plane, lets say an L.A.-to-J.F.K. flight, six hours, and I already know where [the marshals] are sitting. I know what they look like. I watched them in the airport they got paraded by the passengers. . . Eventually, one of them has got to go to the bathroom, right? So the partner goes into the bathroom, and I come up on the guy one good, swift punch into the carotid artery will render him unconscious. Then I take his gun and wait for his partner to get out of the lav and shoot him. Now Ive got two weapons.

He added, When that planes up in the air, we cant even hear people walking up the aisles, because of the ambient noise. Were sitting ducks.

Said another marshal, Im not saying that none of us could successfully handle the situation, because theres a chance [the terrorists] could make a mistake. But if they trained properly and were prepared, they could I have no doubt in my mind overtake air marshals and take their guns. I have no doubt I could put a team together and do it myself.

A pilot for a major airline said the question that needs to be asked is: Are we really safer with them or without them?

http://www.nbpc.net/news/headlines/vanity_fair.htm
Doppy is offline  
Old Mar 15, 2006 | 10:14 pm
  #2  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: QLA
Programs: SBUX Gold
Posts: 14,508
Enlightening. And disturbingly so.
IceTrojan is offline  
Old Mar 16, 2006 | 6:53 am
  #3  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Winter Garden, FL
Programs: Delta DM-3MM United Gold-MM Marriott Lifetime Titanium Hertz President's Circle
Posts: 13,498
This is a good article, and it's about time the general media started noticing the kabuki nature of our "security." But there is very little here that hasn't already been said within Flyertalk -- many, many times.

Bruce
bdschobel is offline  
Old Mar 16, 2006 | 8:56 am
  #4  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 10,034
Originally Posted by bdschobel
This is a good article, and it's about time the general media started noticing the kabuki nature of our "security." But there is very little here that hasn't already been said within Flyertalk -- many, many times.

Bruce
Agreed. It's unfortunate that nothing will likely be done or actioned upon until after the elections in November.
LessO2 is offline  
Old Mar 17, 2006 | 10:36 am
  #5  
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 757
I wonder how easily these air marshal badges can be spoofed. seemed like that's all you need.

It seems easier to pretend to be an air marshal than to be a police officer which would likely require a uniform
medic is offline  
Old Mar 17, 2006 | 10:41 am
  #6  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 10,034
Originally Posted by medic
I wonder how easily these air marshal badges can be spoofed. seemed like that's all you need.

It seems easier to pretend to be an air marshal than to be a police officer which would likely require a uniform
I think that would be more difficult than passing prohibited items past the TSA.

For starters, have you ever seen an Air Marshal's badge? Second, there's a procedure they have to follow to gain access to the "sterile" area. I think a TSAer is more likely to sniff that out that catching those bomb-making materials.
LessO2 is offline  
Old Mar 17, 2006 | 10:46 am
  #7  
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Houston
Posts: 8,957
Originally Posted by LessO2
I think a TSAer is more likely to sniff that out that catching those bomb-making materials.
Given today's disclosure about 0 for 21 on finding bomb-making materials, that doesn't appear to be a high standard to overcome.
ND Sol is offline  
Old Mar 17, 2006 | 11:28 am
  #8  
Moderator, Omni, Omni/PR, Omni/Games, FlyerTalk Posting Legend
20 Countries Visited
1M
40 Nights
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Between DCA and IAD
Programs: UA 1K MM; Hilton Diamond
Posts: 72,675
Originally Posted by medic
I wonder how easily these air marshal badges can be spoofed. seemed like that's all you need.

It seems easier to pretend to be an air marshal than to be a police officer which would likely require a uniform
Actually, normal Federal Marshals (not air marshals, mind you) can carry weapons onto planes, whereas LEOs require it to be job-related and have a letter from their supervisor, which the airline counter staff is supposed to verify.

I have known several deputy marshals, and their badges and credentials wouldn't be hard to spoof for a determined terrorist. I don't know the procedures they have to follow about checking in at the counter, security, etc. in bringing their guns onboard. That could be the hang-up, but then, those could be learned through social engineering and simple observation.
exerda is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.