Community
Wiki Posts
Search

"We're going to crash!"

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 2, 2006 | 8:10 pm
  #16  
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Salish Sea
Programs: DL,AC,HH,PC
Posts: 8,972
[QUOTE=Bart]
Originally Posted by Bart
I'm curious why nothing was said about the archaic use of the term "stewardess."
Or that this so-called 'news' organization managed to spell turbulence incorrectly three times. Kind of detracts from their credibility. Oh wait...,it's Sky, they don't have any
Wally Bird is offline  
Old Mar 2, 2006 | 11:00 pm
  #17  
10 Countries Visited
2M
50 Countries Visited
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: TAS
Programs: A3*G, UA 1K
Posts: 9,252
[QUOTE=Wally Bird]
Originally Posted by Bart
Or that this so-called 'news' organization managed to spell turbulence incorrectly three times. Kind of detracts from their credibility. Oh wait...,it's Sky, they don't have any
Perhaps it's a British spelling?
Palal is offline  
Old Mar 2, 2006 | 11:30 pm
  #18  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: DEN
Programs: UA 1MM, Delta Plat
Posts: 11,224
In England it's spelled turboulence.

They add extra letters to everything.

redbeard911 is offline  
Old Mar 3, 2006 | 8:03 pm
  #19  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Half the distance to EWR than PHL.
Programs: UA, AA, B6, BA, Hilton, Hyatt, Marriott, IHG, SPG
Posts: 11,695
Originally Posted by Bart
Aw, c'mon now. She didn't mean anything by that. She was just expressing an opinion. The person next to her may have believed that they weren't going to crash. She happened to believe they were. Everyone's free to speak his or her mind, aren't they?

I'm curious why nothing was said about the archaic use of the term "stewardess." I thought they were all flight attendants. Obviously the article's author is blatantly sexist. We should boycott the skynews website for its insensitivity towards the flight attendant profession. After all, as we all know, flight attendants are clearly better-educated and socially superior to us screener low-lifes who lean forward in the foxholes of freedom valiantly fighting the war on terror with our hand-wands and ETD swabs. Flight attendants are the ones whose lives are now jeapardized by the small scissors and computer geek screwdrivers we now allow at checkpoints. With the additional pressure they now face with the unrestricted threat of being jabed with a pair of manicure scissors, it's no wonder a flight attendant would scream, "we're going to crash!"
I sense you really enjoyed typing that post.
Olton Hall is offline  
Old Mar 3, 2006 | 9:02 pm
  #20  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 8,389
Deleted

Last edited by Bart; Jan 2, 2008 at 5:56 am
Bart is offline  
Old Mar 3, 2006 | 10:22 pm
  #21  
Ari
FlyerTalk Evangelist
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Chicago
Posts: 11,681
Originally Posted by GUWonder
Not in this case, for the FA still lives. Or should the FAMs have shot the FA?
Only to take her out of her misery.
Ari is offline  
Old Mar 4, 2006 | 7:43 am
  #22  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 10,034
Originally Posted by Bart
The FAMs responded with their Second Amendment rights. I don't see the problem here.
THAT'S your response?

Many sovereign nations do not have a Second Amendment, and law-enforcement officials carry firearms. What's the deal with the novelty with FAMs havign weapons?
LessO2 is offline  
Old Mar 6, 2006 | 4:59 pm
  #23  
cur
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Programs: Blah Airlines Executive Beige, DYKWIA Uranium, TX Propane Commission Blue Flame of Valor
Posts: 7,276
Originally Posted by whirledtraveler
http://www.sky.com/skynews/article/0...511193,00.html



This is pretty disheartening. I wonder how often crews just freak under stressful conditions?
Assuming this isn't the British Media blowing things out of proportion (because they NEVER do that)... she probably didn't take her medication. Any (properly) trained FA will know the facts about turbulence and will have seen the video where they bend the 747 wing 130 degrees before it snaps.
cur is offline  
Old Mar 7, 2006 | 10:18 am
  #24  
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Salish Sea
Programs: DL,AC,HH,PC
Posts: 8,972
Originally Posted by cur
Assuming this isn't the British Media blowing things out of proportion (because they NEVER do that)... she probably didn't take her medication. Any (properly) trained FA will know the facts about turbulence and will have seen the video where they bend the 747 wing 130 degrees before it snaps.
Yes it was the media; although I'm not sure the Mirror or Sky even qualify for that dubious classification. A followup report (which I omitted to bookmark) stated that it was in fact a passenger who freaked out not the FA. Not much of a story there though.
Wally Bird is offline  
Old Mar 7, 2006 | 10:49 am
  #25  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 8,389
Deleted

Last edited by Bart; Jan 2, 2008 at 5:56 am
Bart is offline  
Old Mar 7, 2006 | 11:22 am
  #26  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: San Francisco
Programs: AA 3mm Plat
Posts: 10,068
Originally Posted by Bart
Aw, c'mon now. She didn't mean anything by that. She was just expressing an opinion. The person next to her may have believed that they weren't going to crash. She happened to believe they were. Everyone's free to speak his or her mind, aren't they?

I'm curious why nothing was said about the archaic use of the term "stewardess." I thought they were all flight attendants. Obviously the article's author is blatantly sexist. We should boycott the skynews website for its insensitivity towards the flight attendant profession. After all, as we all know, flight attendants are clearly better-educated and socially superior to us screener low-lifes who lean forward in the foxholes of freedom valiantly fighting the war on terror with our hand-wands and ETD swabs. Flight attendants are the ones whose lives are now jeapardized by the small scissors and computer geek screwdrivers we now allow at checkpoints. With the additional pressure they now face with the unrestricted threat of being jabed with a pair of manicure scissors, it's no wonder a flight attendant would scream, "we're going to crash!"

Originally Posted by Bart
You're taking this way too seriously. I'm just having fun with this thread.
Sheesh, Bart! Just when I thought we were in agreement on something!

Seriously, she certainly should have shown more professionalism. Not cut out for the job ...

[/serious]

Now a bin handler? That she could do!
Teacher49 is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.