A FAM Solution (Modest Proposal)
#17
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Seattle, WA, USA
Posts: 2,009
Originally Posted by Sydneysider
You mean instead of playing video games and shooting mentally ill people? 

We also talked about the airlines not getting to sell the seats that the FAMs take. He says the airlines get to write off the full F (or Y if they actually sit in coach) value of the ticket. This is a decent deal for the airlines on flights with modest loads, not so great on the heavy load flights.
I love the idea of the FAMs dressing like the FA crew. After all the FAs are there primarily for your safety.
#18
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Denver
Programs: UA 1K in training
Posts: 2,107
Originally Posted by mcrt
I love the idea of the FAMs dressing like the FA crew. After all the FAs are there primarily for your safety.
#19




Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Houston
Posts: 8,957
Originally Posted by mcrt
We also talked about the airlines not getting to sell the seats that the FAMs take. He says the airlines get to write off the full F (or Y if they actually sit in coach) value of the ticket. This is a decent deal for the airlines on flights with modest loads, not so great on the heavy load flights.
#20
Original Member




Join Date: May 1998
Location: Orange County, CA, USA
Programs: AA (Life Plat), Marriott (Life Titanium) and every other US program
Posts: 6,416
Write-off Isn't True
The write-off, as discussed many times here, is *not* true.
What I find most interesting is that many of the FAM's apparently believe it is true. I think that there was anecdotal information that they are actually told this lie by their management, which raises the question, why do they want to lie to their own people about this item?
What I find most interesting is that many of the FAM's apparently believe it is true. I think that there was anecdotal information that they are actually told this lie by their management, which raises the question, why do they want to lie to their own people about this item?
#21
Join Date: Aug 2004
Programs: UA, SWA, HA, Qantas
Posts: 660
Originally Posted by sbrower
The write-off, as discussed many times here, is *not* true.
What I find most interesting is that many of the FAM's apparently believe it is true. I think that there was anecdotal information that they are actually told this lie by their management, which raises the question, why do they want to lie to their own people about this item?
What I find most interesting is that many of the FAM's apparently believe it is true. I think that there was anecdotal information that they are actually told this lie by their management, which raises the question, why do they want to lie to their own people about this item?
My opinion is that an "arrangement" may have been in place prior to 9-11 when the numbers were smaller. I would like to think its still in place, and would love to be able to find the "proof", but I am not too confident.
#22
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: IAD, DCA
Programs: UA-Plat, Marriott-Plat, AAI, AAII
Posts: 3,758
Originally Posted by Wiirachay
Instead of FAMs taking up first class seats, they fly as fake flight attendants? They can use those F/A seats and could also monitor the entire plane. The displaced F/A's can either sit in Y of F is there is space or just not fly while getting paid.
#23


Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: NTTB
Programs: UA 1K, Marriott Plat
Posts: 4,656
I have a random question...
Can you get in trouble for audibly identifying a FAM? For example, your finishing up your conversation with your significant other and you finish the conversation by (at a modest volume) saying, don't worry baby, I feel safe because I am sitting next to a Federal Air Marshall (obviously with a slight hint of sarcasm in your voice).
How would a FAM react in this scenario?
Can you get in trouble for audibly identifying a FAM? For example, your finishing up your conversation with your significant other and you finish the conversation by (at a modest volume) saying, don't worry baby, I feel safe because I am sitting next to a Federal Air Marshall (obviously with a slight hint of sarcasm in your voice).
How would a FAM react in this scenario?
#24
Moderator: Coupon Connection & S.P.A.M




Join Date: May 2000
Location: Louisville, KY
Programs: Destination Unknown, TSA Disparager Diamond (LTDD)
Posts: 58,133
Originally Posted by FightingIlliniUAL
I have a random question...
Can you get in trouble for audibly identifying a FAM? For example, your finishing up your conversation with your significant other and you finish the conversation by (at a modest volume) saying, don't worry baby, I feel safe because I am sitting next to a Federal Air Marshall (obviously with a slight hint of sarcasm in your voice).
How would a FAM react in this scenario?
Can you get in trouble for audibly identifying a FAM? For example, your finishing up your conversation with your significant other and you finish the conversation by (at a modest volume) saying, don't worry baby, I feel safe because I am sitting next to a Federal Air Marshall (obviously with a slight hint of sarcasm in your voice).
How would a FAM react in this scenario?
#25
Used to be Sydneysider
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: CPH
Programs: AS MVP/Gold (and 75K aspirant)
Posts: 2,984
Originally Posted by Spiff
Make some notes in the PDA and confront you after the flight, do the ID check on you and grill you as to why you're so interested in them.
Repeat this great advice from bdschobel as necessary.
#26
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: May 2001
Location: LAX; AA EXP, MM; HH Gold
Posts: 31,789
Originally Posted by gre
Why would the FAM have to be a "fake" FA? Why can't the FAM actually work the flights he/she/it is flying? Heck, this would save the airlines money.

Let's face it - it's easy to drift off while seated in an F seat on a warm airplane. Even if you've had a good night's sleep and are alert before boarding. But just try to fall asleep while walking around serving drinks.

