Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Travel&Dining > Travel Safety/Security > Practical Travel Safety and Security Issues
Reload this Page >

TSA Assessing Airlines Additional Amounts for 2005

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

TSA Assessing Airlines Additional Amounts for 2005

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 21, 2006 | 6:37 pm
  #1  
Original Poster
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Houston
Posts: 8,957
TSA Assessing Airlines Additional Amounts for 2005

The TSA is assessing airlines hundreds of millions dollars more in 2005 security fees.

According to this article, "Continental is being asked to pay almost $7 million more for 2005, which is considerably less than many other airlines. Dallas-based Southwest, for example, has been billed $24 million."

Talk about rubbing salt in the wound.
ND Sol is offline  
Old Jan 21, 2006 | 7:14 pm
  #2  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Watchlisted by the prejudiced, en route to purgatory
Programs: Just Say No to Fleecing and Blacklisting
Posts: 102,077
This may end up with airlines making "free tickets" -- using miles -- even less free ... especially as security fees get raised again and applied to award tickets.

And then there are all those other tickets on which we will have to pay more security fees.

This insecurity is costing us a lot. And the nickle and diming continues, on a bigger dollar basis.
GUWonder is offline  
Old Jan 21, 2006 | 11:20 pm
  #3  
In Memoriam, FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Benicia CA
Programs: Alaska MVP Gold 75K, AA 3.8MM, UA 1.1MM, enjoying the retired life
Posts: 31,849
Rather interesting that the healthy carriers may end up paying, and those in chapter 11 could get a free ride, or get away for pennies on the dollar.
tom911 is offline  
Old Jan 21, 2006 | 11:25 pm
  #4  
Moderator: Coupon Connection & S.P.A.M
50 Countries Visited
5M
All eyes on you!
25 Years on Site
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Louisville, KY
Programs: Destination Unknown, TSA Disparager Diamond (LTDD)
Posts: 58,133
It's long past time for all carriers to get together and tell the TSA to go pound sand.
Spiff is offline  
Old Jan 22, 2006 | 5:03 pm
  #5  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
10 Countries Visited500k30 Nights20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: BWI
Programs: AA Gold, HH Diamond, National Emerald Executive, TSA Disparager Gold
Posts: 15,180
Originally Posted by Spiff
It's long past time for all carriers to get together and tell the TSA to go pound sand.
Totally agree. Sad thing is, the airlines are probably the only ones Congress will listen too.
Superguy is offline  
Old Jan 22, 2006 | 5:04 pm
  #6  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
10 Countries Visited500k30 Nights20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: BWI
Programs: AA Gold, HH Diamond, National Emerald Executive, TSA Disparager Gold
Posts: 15,180
Originally Posted by ND Sol
The TSA is assessing airlines hundreds of millions dollars more in 2005 security fees.

According to this article, "Continental is being asked to pay almost $7 million more for 2005, which is considerably less than many other airlines. Dallas-based Southwest, for example, has been billed $24 million."

Talk about rubbing salt in the wound.
They must have a few more offices that need redecorated and probably a few lifetime achievement awards to hand out.

I don't know how many times I heard at work that they don't have money for something and we have to make due. TSA should be the same way. I'm sure there are a few things they could do for efficiency. No shoe carnival would be a good start.
Superguy is offline  
Old Jan 22, 2006 | 7:13 pm
  #7  
Moderator: Coupon Connection & S.P.A.M
50 Countries Visited
5M
All eyes on you!
25 Years on Site
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Louisville, KY
Programs: Destination Unknown, TSA Disparager Diamond (LTDD)
Posts: 58,133
Originally Posted by Superguy
Totally agree. Sad thing is, the airlines are probably the only ones Congress will listen too.
Since ours is a Government by Bribery, you are absolutely correct. The airlines need to start putting those lobbying dollars to work and draw the line on unnecessary inSecurity.
Spiff is offline  
Old Jan 22, 2006 | 7:36 pm
  #8  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: unreserved car luggage rack
Programs: Indian Railways Wallah Program
Posts: 6,531
Originally Posted by Spiff
Since ours is a Government by Bribery, you are absolutely correct. The airlines need to start putting those lobbying dollars to work and draw the line on unnecessary inSecurity.
Well, the bankrupt legacy carriers are too busy looking for bailouts from congress to cooperate with the remaining solvent carriers and fight this. It's like a darn Gotti shakedown
cj001f is offline  
Old Jan 22, 2006 | 7:42 pm
  #9  
Used to be Sydneysider
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: CPH
Programs: AS MVP/Gold (and 75K aspirant)
Posts: 2,984
Originally Posted by GUWonder
This may end up with airlines making "free tickets" -- using miles -- even less free ... especially as security fees get raised again and applied to award tickets.

And then there are all those other tickets on which we will have to pay more security fees.

This insecurity is costing us a lot. And the nickle and diming continues, on a bigger dollar basis.
I seem to recall some discussion, a proposal by the administration IIRC, that would raise the tax to $7.50. Did Congress pass this? If so, when does it come into effect?
Savvy Traveler is offline  
Old Jan 22, 2006 | 7:55 pm
  #10  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
10 Countries Visited500k30 Nights20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: BWI
Programs: AA Gold, HH Diamond, National Emerald Executive, TSA Disparager Gold
Posts: 15,180
Originally Posted by Spiff
Since ours is a Government by Bribery, you are absolutely correct. The airlines need to start putting those lobbying dollars to work and draw the line on unnecessary inSecurity.
I wonder if they actually would, though. Ma and Pa Kettle still pay their bills. It'd have to be an all or nothing deal with the airlines ... if they aren't all involved, it won't happen.
Superguy is offline  
Old Jan 22, 2006 | 10:33 pm
  #11  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: LAX; AA EXP, MM; HH Gold
Posts: 31,789
Originally Posted by ender83
I seem to recall some discussion, a proposal by the administration IIRC, that would raise the tax to $7.50. Did Congress pass this? If so, when does it come into effect?
Not yet. The September 11 Security Fee is still $2.50/segment, maximum $10 per round trip.

Most stupid tax enactment ever. Airline industry is obviously swirling in the toilet in November, 2001, and yet Congress passes a new tax on air travel. Since then, billions of dollars of airline losses (and billions of dollars of September 11 Security Fees collected).
FWAAA is offline  
Old Jan 23, 2006 | 6:50 am
  #12  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Miami, FL
Programs: AA EXP/Marriott Plat/Hertz PC
Posts: 12,724
Originally Posted by ND Sol
The TSA is assessing airlines hundreds of millions dollars more in 2005 security fees.

According to this article, "Continental is being asked to pay almost $7 million more for 2005, which is considerably less than many other airlines. Dallas-based Southwest, for example, has been billed $24 million."

Talk about rubbing salt in the wound.

^ ^ This is good news. The TSA is its own worst enemy. Go TSA!!
whirledtraveler is offline  
Old Jan 23, 2006 | 3:29 pm
  #13  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
10 Countries Visited500k30 Nights20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: BWI
Programs: AA Gold, HH Diamond, National Emerald Executive, TSA Disparager Gold
Posts: 15,180
Originally Posted by FWAAA
Not yet. The September 11 Security Fee is still $2.50/segment, maximum $10 per round trip.

Most stupid tax enactment ever. Airline industry is obviously swirling in the toilet in November, 2001, and yet Congress passes a new tax on air travel. Since then, billions of dollars of airline losses (and billions of dollars of September 11 Security Fees collected).
I agree.

Not only that, but taxes are just insane on plane tickets. Sometimes the percentage is upwards of 50% on a plane ticket.

I bought a plane ticket for my mother-in-law earlier this spring and the fare was around $132. $88 of that was the the airfare, $44 was in taxes. If the taxes hadn't been so much AA could have had a nicer chunk of that money.

The airlines are the only business that the government wants to tax back into profitability. And we can see how well that worked.
Superguy is offline  
Old Jan 24, 2006 | 2:07 pm
  #14  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Finally back in Boston after escaping from New York
Posts: 13,684
A quick way to get rid of this garbage:

From now on, all Congressmen/women will be assigned the SSSS. That will lead to awfully fast changes.

Mike
mikeef is offline  
Old Jan 24, 2006 | 2:21 pm
  #15  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: unreserved car luggage rack
Programs: Indian Railways Wallah Program
Posts: 6,531
Originally Posted by Superguy
If the taxes hadn't been so much AA could have had a nicer chunk of that money.

The airlines are the only business that the government wants to tax back into profitability. And we can see how well that worked.
The legacy airline industry loves that logic, doesn't work for me, and I'm pretty sure Southwest/WalMart air agrees. Cut the taxes and the customer will get a cheaper ticket. Perhaps some people will fly more; for me I already travel as much as vacation/work allows - the money won't go into the airlines pocket.

The taxes on your ticket are "high" because they are segment based, i.e. $2.50 per segment max $5 one way $10 return. That's quite logical because each passenger must go through security - and that security is not tied to the price of their ticket. Similarly with Air Passenger Facility Fees, etc.
cj001f is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.