Security in Oz is too cute
#31
FlyerTalk Evangelist




Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: MUC/LAX/SMV
Programs: LH, UA, BD, AA, NW, FB, NH, AC, Sixt, Hertz, Avis, *W, HH, Marriott, PC, Leaders Club, AMEX
Posts: 12,406
Originally Posted by stimpy
Not true. In Shengen and most domestic flights that I recall, you don't need a passport but you do need an national photo ID. This is for obvious reasons that they just don't care about in Oz. God bless em.
Maybe it was because you look like you are carrying a bomb...
Last edited by flysurfer; Nov 26, 2005 at 2:25 am
#32
Suspended
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Watchlisted by the prejudiced, en route to purgatory
Programs: Just Say No to Fleecing and Blacklisting
Posts: 102,077
Originally Posted by bambi47
If only I could fondle mens rear "muscles", then my days would be much happier.
#33
Suspended
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Watchlisted by the prejudiced, en route to purgatory
Programs: Just Say No to Fleecing and Blacklisting
Posts: 102,077
Originally Posted by stimpy
To get things back on track, I forgot to mention that I was also surprised that I could fly domesticly in Oz without showing anyone an ID. I used my Amex to get my BP at a Quantas check-in machine at SYD for my flight to BNE. No ID check at security or the gate. Again, too cute!
No ID check for intra-Sweden flights.
I originally thought this thread was one of those "male forum" threads and a commentary about some attractive Australian female working security.
#34
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: CGK
Programs: LH SEN (LH*G), HH Diamond, AB Gold (1W Saph)
Posts: 5,677
Originally Posted by GeneralAviation
If you're at the checkpoint and see your friend John in line ahead of
you, just make sure you NEVER shout, "Hi, Jack!"
you, just make sure you NEVER shout, "Hi, Jack!"

#35
Original Poster
FlyerTalk Evangelist

Join Date: Feb 1999
Location: Seat 1A, Juice pretty much everywhere, Mucci des Coins Exotiques
Posts: 34,337
I don't know every countries rules either, but I live in France and take dozens of domestic flights in France and dozens more within Schengen each year. If any of those flights didn't require an ID I don't remember it. I do clearly remember people around me showing their national ID and I always have to show mine. I fly in and out of Spain often and I know they require ID's for Schengen flights. I haven't been able to get the KLM check-in machines to work for me so I'm not sure about NL.
Also, I know you have to show ID's for LH flights to FRA from France.
Also, I know you have to show ID's for LH flights to FRA from France.
#36
FlyerTalk Evangelist




Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: MUC/LAX/SMV
Programs: LH, UA, BD, AA, NW, FB, NH, AC, Sixt, Hertz, Avis, *W, HH, Marriott, PC, Leaders Club, AMEX
Posts: 12,406
Originally Posted by stimpy
I don't know every countries rules either, but I live in France and take dozens of domestic flights in France and dozens more within Schengen each year.
Obviously, ID checks make sense for AIRLINES in order for them to make sure that the person who bought a restricted/cheap/nonrefundable ticket (now very popular in Europe) is travelling on it, and not somebody else (like a friend or family member). But these checks, if they occur, have nothing to do with security. Btw, even in the USA, you don't need an ID for domestic flights. However, w/o ID, you'll have to undergo additional screening. So my guess would be, if you declined to show your ID in France, you would still be able to fly. Well, try that next time (by pretending to have fogotten your ID) on a domestic flight and tell us about the reaction.
#37

Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Sydney, Australia
Programs: QC Life, AA
Posts: 136
Originally Posted by whirledtraveler
Baloney. I don't believe that there is anyone so sensitive that they can't handle hearing the word 'bomb' in an airport in a non-threatening manner.
The speech fetish at airports today is a created problem, not a preexisting one.
The speech fetish at airports today is a created problem, not a preexisting one.
#38
Original Poster
FlyerTalk Evangelist

Join Date: Feb 1999
Location: Seat 1A, Juice pretty much everywhere, Mucci des Coins Exotiques
Posts: 34,337
Originally Posted by flysurfer
Obviously, ID checks make sense for AIRLINES in order for them to make sure that the person who bought a restricted/cheap/nonrefundable ticket (now very popular in Europe) is travelling on it, and not somebody else (like a friend or family member). But these checks, if they occur, have nothing to do with security.
BTW I just flew domestic in NZ and they don't ask for any sort of ID either. But then again, no one dislikes the Kiwis.
#39
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Winter Garden, FL
Programs: Delta DM-3MM United Gold-MM Marriott Lifetime Titanium Hertz President's Circle
Posts: 13,498
Not so fast, stimpy! Our president, George W. Bush, has told us many times that terrorists hate freedom -- or, alternatively, hate us for our freedom. New Zealanders are, without any doubt, free. Therefore, the terrorists must hate New Zealanders. Ipso facto! Terrorists must really hate the Swedes! They must be shaking in their boots.
Bruce
Bruce
#40
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend, In Memoriam




Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Yiron, Israel
Programs: Bates Motel Plat
Posts: 69,201
Originally Posted by bambi47
When your a really pretty blonde like me 

Originally Posted by bambi47
If only I could fondle mens rear "muscles", then my days would be much happier.
#41
FlyerTalk Evangelist




Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: MUC/LAX/SMV
Programs: LH, UA, BD, AA, NW, FB, NH, AC, Sixt, Hertz, Avis, *W, HH, Marriott, PC, Leaders Club, AMEX
Posts: 12,406
Originally Posted by stimpy
I think they do have a lot to do with security. If you read this forum you know there is a lot going on about "no-fly" lists.
Also, that's why in Germany every pax to the US is subject to a SECOND security screening that follows another standard dictated by the US and has to fill out a form with his personal data and his first address in the US (also mandated by the US). Of course, it doesn't stop here, as (given he's not American) he'll have to to fill out 2 more forms (4 pages) on the plane and will finally be questioned, photographed and fingerprinted upon his arrival in the USA.
An American flying FROM the US to Germany will not have to fill out any paperwork and will not be fingerprinted or photographed. Yet the German people still feel safe. I know, they must be kinda stupid. Or cute.
#42
Suspended
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Watchlisted by the prejudiced, en route to purgatory
Programs: Just Say No to Fleecing and Blacklisting
Posts: 102,077
Flying as a non-American on an American carrier to the US seems like a pain:
1. Submit your first address in the US to the airline; and all the details must be stored and transmitted by the airline to the US government so that we Americans have a bigger haystack for which to look for a needle or two.
2. The secondary security screening nonsense when the flight is operated by an American carrier heading to the US. But if you fly a non-US-based carrier the secondary screening and all those stupid questions from "contract" security -- which couldn't tell a monkey from a gorilla -- doesn't occur.
And now even US citizens may get some additional harassment from immigration and customs upon arrival in the US if even one letter in the passenger manifest is different from the passport details. Talk about ridiculous.
Some could probably live more free from government interference in Afghanistan than in the US.
1. Submit your first address in the US to the airline; and all the details must be stored and transmitted by the airline to the US government so that we Americans have a bigger haystack for which to look for a needle or two.
2. The secondary security screening nonsense when the flight is operated by an American carrier heading to the US. But if you fly a non-US-based carrier the secondary screening and all those stupid questions from "contract" security -- which couldn't tell a monkey from a gorilla -- doesn't occur.
And now even US citizens may get some additional harassment from immigration and customs upon arrival in the US if even one letter in the passenger manifest is different from the passport details. Talk about ridiculous.
Some could probably live more free from government interference in Afghanistan than in the US.
#43
Suspended
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Watchlisted by the prejudiced, en route to purgatory
Programs: Just Say No to Fleecing and Blacklisting
Posts: 102,077
Identity is not security -- nor are these various "lists" going to provide absolute security. Terrorists -- especially suicidal terrorists -- will use real authentic ID just as readily as fake ID. Many even show real authentic ID on the days where they decide to show their worst side to the world.
#44
FlyerTalk Evangelist




Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: MUC/LAX/SMV
Programs: LH, UA, BD, AA, NW, FB, NH, AC, Sixt, Hertz, Avis, *W, HH, Marriott, PC, Leaders Club, AMEX
Posts: 12,406
Originally Posted by GUWonder
But if you fly a non-US-based carrier the secondary screening and all those stupid questions from "contract" security -- which couldn't tell a monkey from a gorilla -- doesn't occur.
Amazingly, the TSA screening in LAX is very nice and relaxed leaving from the TBIT, as the guys working at the International Terminal are consistently one of the best.

