Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Security in Oz is too cute

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 26, 2005 | 2:22 am
  #31  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: MUC/LAX/SMV
Programs: LH, UA, BD, AA, NW, FB, NH, AC, Sixt, Hertz, Avis, *W, HH, Marriott, PC, Leaders Club, AMEX
Posts: 12,406
Originally Posted by stimpy
Not true. In Shengen and most domestic flights that I recall, you don't need a passport but you do need an national photo ID. This is for obvious reasons that they just don't care about in Oz. God bless em.
Well, I was born and live in the Schengen zone, and in the past 34 years I have never been required to show an ID on 100s of domestic flights in Germany and, since Schengen exists, many intra-Schengen flights. A actually didn't even OWN a national ID card until I turned 28, and I certainly didn't carry my passport on domestic trips. But I can't speak for ALL European countries, a fact that I indicated in my post.

Maybe it was because you look like you are carrying a bomb...

Last edited by flysurfer; Nov 26, 2005 at 2:25 am
flysurfer is offline  
Old Nov 26, 2005 | 4:55 am
  #32  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Watchlisted by the prejudiced, en route to purgatory
Programs: Just Say No to Fleecing and Blacklisting
Posts: 102,077
Originally Posted by bambi47
If only I could fondle mens rear "muscles", then my days would be much happier.
Remember the woman in the "wheelchair", right?
GUWonder is offline  
Old Nov 26, 2005 | 5:00 am
  #33  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Watchlisted by the prejudiced, en route to purgatory
Programs: Just Say No to Fleecing and Blacklisting
Posts: 102,077
Originally Posted by stimpy
To get things back on track, I forgot to mention that I was also surprised that I could fly domesticly in Oz without showing anyone an ID. I used my Amex to get my BP at a Quantas check-in machine at SYD for my flight to BNE. No ID check at security or the gate. Again, too cute!
No ID check for civilian or government/military flights in India.
No ID check for intra-Sweden flights.

I originally thought this thread was one of those "male forum" threads and a commentary about some attractive Australian female working security.
GUWonder is offline  
Old Nov 26, 2005 | 6:00 am
  #34  
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: CGK
Programs: LH SEN (LH*G), HH Diamond, AB Gold (1W Saph)
Posts: 5,677
Originally Posted by GeneralAviation
If you're at the checkpoint and see your friend John in line ahead of
you, just make sure you NEVER shout, "Hi, Jack!"
Was that Airplane or Airplane II? Anyway, I was about to write the same thing.
alex0683de is offline  
Old Nov 26, 2005 | 12:46 pm
  #35  
Original Poster
FlyerTalk Evangelist
25 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Feb 1999
Location: Seat 1A, Juice pretty much everywhere, Mucci des Coins Exotiques
Posts: 34,337
I don't know every countries rules either, but I live in France and take dozens of domestic flights in France and dozens more within Schengen each year. If any of those flights didn't require an ID I don't remember it. I do clearly remember people around me showing their national ID and I always have to show mine. I fly in and out of Spain often and I know they require ID's for Schengen flights. I haven't been able to get the KLM check-in machines to work for me so I'm not sure about NL.

Also, I know you have to show ID's for LH flights to FRA from France.
stimpy is offline  
Old Nov 26, 2005 | 1:08 pm
  #36  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: MUC/LAX/SMV
Programs: LH, UA, BD, AA, NW, FB, NH, AC, Sixt, Hertz, Avis, *W, HH, Marriott, PC, Leaders Club, AMEX
Posts: 12,406
Originally Posted by stimpy
I don't know every countries rules either, but I live in France and take dozens of domestic flights in France and dozens more within Schengen each year.
Poor French, then, especially if ID checking is not a SkyTeam thing but a mandatory government rule. Who knows more?

Obviously, ID checks make sense for AIRLINES in order for them to make sure that the person who bought a restricted/cheap/nonrefundable ticket (now very popular in Europe) is travelling on it, and not somebody else (like a friend or family member). But these checks, if they occur, have nothing to do with security. Btw, even in the USA, you don't need an ID for domestic flights. However, w/o ID, you'll have to undergo additional screening. So my guess would be, if you declined to show your ID in France, you would still be able to fly. Well, try that next time (by pretending to have fogotten your ID) on a domestic flight and tell us about the reaction.
flysurfer is offline  
Old Nov 26, 2005 | 4:43 pm
  #37  
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Sydney, Australia
Programs: QC Life, AA
Posts: 136
Originally Posted by whirledtraveler
Baloney. I don't believe that there is anyone so sensitive that they can't handle hearing the word 'bomb' in an airport in a non-threatening manner.

The speech fetish at airports today is a created problem, not a preexisting one.
If you read my wording, I did not say that the Security Officer was sensitive, I said it was a "sensitive area". You only have to look at some of the posts in the Travel Safety/Security forum to realise that the whole aspect of TSA and security personnel at airports is a sensitvie topic.
Maca44 is offline  
Old Nov 26, 2005 | 6:39 pm
  #38  
Original Poster
FlyerTalk Evangelist
25 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Feb 1999
Location: Seat 1A, Juice pretty much everywhere, Mucci des Coins Exotiques
Posts: 34,337
Originally Posted by flysurfer
Obviously, ID checks make sense for AIRLINES in order for them to make sure that the person who bought a restricted/cheap/nonrefundable ticket (now very popular in Europe) is travelling on it, and not somebody else (like a friend or family member). But these checks, if they occur, have nothing to do with security.
I think they do have a lot to do with security. If you read this forum you know there is a lot going on about "no-fly" lists. And it's not just America. So if I'm on a "no-fly" list and I want to fly, I can just obtain a ticket in someone elses name and fly without an ID. Except I cannot do that in countries that require an ID even for domestic flights.

BTW I just flew domestic in NZ and they don't ask for any sort of ID either. But then again, no one dislikes the Kiwis.
stimpy is offline  
Old Nov 26, 2005 | 7:20 pm
  #39  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Winter Garden, FL
Programs: Delta DM-3MM United Gold-MM Marriott Lifetime Titanium Hertz President's Circle
Posts: 13,498
Not so fast, stimpy! Our president, George W. Bush, has told us many times that terrorists hate freedom -- or, alternatively, hate us for our freedom. New Zealanders are, without any doubt, free. Therefore, the terrorists must hate New Zealanders. Ipso facto! Terrorists must really hate the Swedes! They must be shaking in their boots.

Bruce
bdschobel is offline  
Old Nov 26, 2005 | 8:12 pm
  #40  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend, In Memoriam
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Yiron, Israel
Programs: Bates Motel Plat
Posts: 69,201
Originally Posted by bambi47
When your a really pretty blonde like me
Originally Posted by bambi47
If only I could fondle mens rear "muscles", then my days would be much happier.
Bambi, I will be making a connection in JFK next month, if you can arrange a transfer out of PHL feel free to fondle all you want!
Dovster is offline  
Old Nov 26, 2005 | 9:23 pm
  #41  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: MUC/LAX/SMV
Programs: LH, UA, BD, AA, NW, FB, NH, AC, Sixt, Hertz, Avis, *W, HH, Marriott, PC, Leaders Club, AMEX
Posts: 12,406
Originally Posted by stimpy
I think they do have a lot to do with security. If you read this forum you know there is a lot going on about "no-fly" lists.
These infamous lists are relevant only to flights to the USA. The USA demands the use of these lists, and the airlines have to comply, if they don't want to lose their landing and overflight rights.

Also, that's why in Germany every pax to the US is subject to a SECOND security screening that follows another standard dictated by the US and has to fill out a form with his personal data and his first address in the US (also mandated by the US). Of course, it doesn't stop here, as (given he's not American) he'll have to to fill out 2 more forms (4 pages) on the plane and will finally be questioned, photographed and fingerprinted upon his arrival in the USA.

An American flying FROM the US to Germany will not have to fill out any paperwork and will not be fingerprinted or photographed. Yet the German people still feel safe. I know, they must be kinda stupid. Or cute.
flysurfer is offline  
Old Nov 26, 2005 | 9:45 pm
  #42  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Watchlisted by the prejudiced, en route to purgatory
Programs: Just Say No to Fleecing and Blacklisting
Posts: 102,077
Flying as a non-American on an American carrier to the US seems like a pain:

1. Submit your first address in the US to the airline; and all the details must be stored and transmitted by the airline to the US government so that we Americans have a bigger haystack for which to look for a needle or two.
2. The secondary security screening nonsense when the flight is operated by an American carrier heading to the US. But if you fly a non-US-based carrier the secondary screening and all those stupid questions from "contract" security -- which couldn't tell a monkey from a gorilla -- doesn't occur.

And now even US citizens may get some additional harassment from immigration and customs upon arrival in the US if even one letter in the passenger manifest is different from the passport details. Talk about ridiculous.

Some could probably live more free from government interference in Afghanistan than in the US.
GUWonder is offline  
Old Nov 26, 2005 | 9:49 pm
  #43  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Watchlisted by the prejudiced, en route to purgatory
Programs: Just Say No to Fleecing and Blacklisting
Posts: 102,077
Identity is not security -- nor are these various "lists" going to provide absolute security. Terrorists -- especially suicidal terrorists -- will use real authentic ID just as readily as fake ID. Many even show real authentic ID on the days where they decide to show their worst side to the world.
GUWonder is offline  
Old Nov 26, 2005 | 9:55 pm
  #44  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: MUC/LAX/SMV
Programs: LH, UA, BD, AA, NW, FB, NH, AC, Sixt, Hertz, Avis, *W, HH, Marriott, PC, Leaders Club, AMEX
Posts: 12,406
Originally Posted by GUWonder
But if you fly a non-US-based carrier the secondary screening and all those stupid questions from "contract" security -- which couldn't tell a monkey from a gorilla -- doesn't occur.
In MUC and FRA, all US bound pax have to undergo secondary screening, no matter what airline (LH or US flag carriers) they are flying. Sometimes, they even play the "shoe carnival", but in the end, lines are small (at least in MUC) and you don't really lose much time. They also have priority lines in MUC for secondary screening, but nobody seems to care about enforcing them.

Amazingly, the TSA screening in LAX is very nice and relaxed leaving from the TBIT, as the guys working at the International Terminal are consistently one of the best.
flysurfer is offline  
Old Nov 26, 2005 | 10:37 pm
  #45  
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: soaking up the sun
Programs: unemployment
Posts: 687
Originally Posted by GUWonder
Remember the woman in the "wheelchair", right?
Like I said, fondleing men's rear muscles would make me happy. Doing a pat down on a woman is just work.
bambi47 is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.