Australian Security Gone Mad
#1
Original Poster


Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Europe & Middle East
Programs: BA GGL (LTG), Marriott LT Titanium, EK Plat, Amex Cent
Posts: 904
Australian Security Gone Mad
I am sure it's just because the Aussies love to get one over on us Brits, but there was fisticuffs down under today as they insisted on searching Prince Andrew!!
Like the British Royal family are going to suddenly be suicide bombers or aircarft hijackers!!
Madness!!
Like the British Royal family are going to suddenly be suicide bombers or aircarft hijackers!!
Madness!!
#2
FlyerTalk Evangelist




Join Date: Dec 1999
Programs: Marriott Lifetime Titanium, IHG Diamond, United Silver
Posts: 16,890
Originally Posted by nimeta
I am sure it's just because the Aussies love to get one over on us Brits, but there was fisticuffs down under today as they insisted on searching Prince Andrew!!
Like the British Royal family are going to suddenly be suicide bombers or aircarft hijackers!!
Madness!!
Like the British Royal family are going to suddenly be suicide bombers or aircarft hijackers!!
Madness!!
#3
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 704
Originally Posted by nimeta
I am sure it's just because the Aussies love to get one over on us Brits, but there was fisticuffs down under today as they insisted on searching Prince Andrew!!
Like the British Royal family are going to suddenly be suicide bombers or aircarft hijackers!!
Madness!!
Like the British Royal family are going to suddenly be suicide bombers or aircarft hijackers!!
Madness!!
#6
Guest
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 95
Even so, why should anyone just be excused because of their status? You either screen everybody, or nobody. I think it's ridiculous that certain people are (or should be) allowed to skip security, it completely defeats the purpose of security, and why? Because you TRUST them to do the right thing?
#7
Original Poster


Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Europe & Middle East
Programs: BA GGL (LTG), Marriott LT Titanium, EK Plat, Amex Cent
Posts: 904
Originally Posted by Liam0s
Even so, why should anyone just be excused because of their status? You either screen everybody, or nobody. I think it's ridiculous that certain people are (or should be) allowed to skip security, it completely defeats the purpose of security, and why? Because you TRUST them to do the right thing?
#8
Guest
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 95
It most certainly is not stupid, and it's ridiculous for you to even think so. Yeah, sure it's unlikely that someone who is considered to be a VIP with such a highly public life is going to be a terrorist or anything, but what the hell is the point of having a "secure area" such as airside when it's not really secure if people are able to bypass screening? I don't care who they are, if you start letting people through security, what the hell is the point of security?
#9
Original Poster


Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Europe & Middle East
Programs: BA GGL (LTG), Marriott LT Titanium, EK Plat, Amex Cent
Posts: 904
Originally Posted by Liam0s
I don't care who they are, if you start letting people through security, what the hell is the point of security?
#10
Join Date: Aug 2005
Programs: AA, UA, DL,
Posts: 588
Hello,
I was the Orlando Airport (MCO) recently, and there's a huge sign that says "FEMA Workers" this way -- and it leads them past security -- just show your FEMA badge and you're on your way.
Which I don't think is fair. Heads of State I can understand about bypassing security, but *all* FEMA workers get a bye? It's not fair.
David
I was the Orlando Airport (MCO) recently, and there's a huge sign that says "FEMA Workers" this way -- and it leads them past security -- just show your FEMA badge and you're on your way.
Which I don't think is fair. Heads of State I can understand about bypassing security, but *all* FEMA workers get a bye? It's not fair.
David
#11


Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Orlando
Programs: DL 4MM/DM, UA 1MM/Gold, AA Paper
Posts: 1,386
Originally Posted by DavidHatt
I was the Orlando Airport (MCO) recently, and there's a huge sign that says "FEMA Workers" this way -- and it leads them past security -- just show your FEMA badge and you're on your way.
In regards to screening Prince Andrew, is the world any safer for doing it? I seriously doubt it. Just another dog and pony show for security's sake.
#12
Suspended
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Watchlisted by the prejudiced, en route to purgatory
Programs: Just Say No to Fleecing and Blacklisting
Posts: 102,077
I am all in favor of "politicians" (and royal tools are lumped into that category) being subject to the same dog and pony show as the general population. Otherwise, they are far less likely to internalize the extent of idiocy that is demonstrated by the shoe carnival and the like (more the latter than the former given we are talking about Australia and not the United States).
Last edited by GUWonder; Oct 7, 2005 at 3:03 pm
#13
Original Poster


Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Europe & Middle East
Programs: BA GGL (LTG), Marriott LT Titanium, EK Plat, Amex Cent
Posts: 904
Originally Posted by GUWonder
I am all in favor of "politicians" (and royal tools are lumped into that category) being subject to the same dog and pony show as the general population. Otherwise, they are far less likely to internalize the extent of idiocy that is demonstrated by the shoe carnival and the like (more the latter than the former given we are talking about Australia and not the United States).
#14
FlyerTalk Evangelist




Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: AU
Programs: former Olympic Airways Gold (yeah - still proud of that!)
Posts: 14,538
Originally Posted by GUWonder
I am all in favor of "politicians" (and royal tools are lumped into that category) being subject to the same dog and pony show as the general population. Otherwise, they are far less likely to internalize the extent of idiocy that is demonstrated by the shoe carnival and the like (more the latter than the former given we are talking about Australia and not the United States).
However - in response to other posters - there is a considerable difference between VIPs / CIPs / Celebs (who I think SHOULD all be screened - and usually are - for example Diana Ross' search at Heathrow) and those travelling on Diplomatic Passports.
The latter category should not be searched, and indeed are exempt under international law. I would think Prince Andrew would almost certainly have been travelling on a diplomatic passport?
Regards
WG
#15


Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: LAX, SAN, ORD, MAA & COK
Programs: AA LT EXP 6+ MM, AC, DL (MM) & LT SkyClub, All Airlines 10+MM, Hilton LT Diamond, Bonvoy LT Plat
Posts: 761
Some Royal Family members or VIPs can be dangerous!
Originally Posted by nimeta
...Like the British Royal family are going to suddenly be suicide bombers or aircarft hijackers!!...
The last Iraqi tyrant ruler Saddam Hussein's older son murdered his father's cook in Egypt! He probably traveled on a diplomatic passport and perhaps carried guns.
Granted that these people did not commit their crimes while traveling IHMO the fact that they are members of a Royal family or travel on diplomatic passports should not exempt them from security screenings.




@:-) :-: ^