Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Australian Security Gone Mad

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 3, 2005 | 6:54 pm
  #1  
Original Poster
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Europe & Middle East
Programs: BA GGL (LTG), Marriott LT Titanium, EK Plat, Amex Cent
Posts: 904
Australian Security Gone Mad

I am sure it's just because the Aussies love to get one over on us Brits, but there was fisticuffs down under today as they insisted on searching Prince Andrew!!

Like the British Royal family are going to suddenly be suicide bombers or aircarft hijackers!!

Madness!!
nimeta is offline  
Old Oct 3, 2005 | 7:09 pm
  #2  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
20 Countries Visited
2M
100 Nights
25 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Programs: Marriott Lifetime Titanium, IHG Diamond, United Silver
Posts: 16,890
Originally Posted by nimeta
I am sure it's just because the Aussies love to get one over on us Brits, but there was fisticuffs down under today as they insisted on searching Prince Andrew!!

Like the British Royal family are going to suddenly be suicide bombers or aircarft hijackers!!

Madness!!
He's just as likely as me, as far as I'm concerned. I just cost the average citizen in my country a heckuva lot less.
RichMSN is offline  
Old Oct 5, 2005 | 2:22 am
  #3  
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 704
Originally Posted by nimeta
I am sure it's just because the Aussies love to get one over on us Brits, but there was fisticuffs down under today as they insisted on searching Prince Andrew!!

Like the British Royal family are going to suddenly be suicide bombers or aircarft hijackers!!

Madness!!
They just wanted a chance to touch the royal family's jewels.
Peetah is offline  
Old Oct 5, 2005 | 9:33 am
  #4  
Moderator: Midwest, Las Vegas & Dining Buzz
10 Countries Visited
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Chicago, Illinois
Posts: 18,093
Originally Posted by Peetah
They just wanted a chance to touch the royal family's jewels.
^ ^ ^
iluv2fly is offline  
Old Oct 5, 2005 | 11:39 am
  #5  
Original Member
10 Countries Visited
100k
Community Influencer
25 Years on Site
 
Join Date: May 1998
Location: PDX
Programs: TSA Refusenik charter member
Posts: 16,127
Originally Posted by Peetah
They just wanted a chance to touch the royal family's jewels.
Kah-****ing ching! @:-) :-: ^
essxjay is offline  
Old Oct 5, 2005 | 6:33 pm
  #6  
Guest
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 95
Even so, why should anyone just be excused because of their status? You either screen everybody, or nobody. I think it's ridiculous that certain people are (or should be) allowed to skip security, it completely defeats the purpose of security, and why? Because you TRUST them to do the right thing?
flyertalker00151 is offline  
Old Oct 6, 2005 | 3:22 pm
  #7  
Original Poster
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Europe & Middle East
Programs: BA GGL (LTG), Marriott LT Titanium, EK Plat, Amex Cent
Posts: 904
Originally Posted by Liam0s
Even so, why should anyone just be excused because of their status? You either screen everybody, or nobody. I think it's ridiculous that certain people are (or should be) allowed to skip security, it completely defeats the purpose of security, and why? Because you TRUST them to do the right thing?
Many airports have VIP sections to avoid embarrasing overseas VIP's like this. I have only used it once, ironically in Pakistan, and I was not screened. You simply cannot screen the likes of Bush, Bliar, Brenda etc... its stupid!!
nimeta is offline  
Old Oct 6, 2005 | 8:29 pm
  #8  
Guest
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 95
It most certainly is not stupid, and it's ridiculous for you to even think so. Yeah, sure it's unlikely that someone who is considered to be a VIP with such a highly public life is going to be a terrorist or anything, but what the hell is the point of having a "secure area" such as airside when it's not really secure if people are able to bypass screening? I don't care who they are, if you start letting people through security, what the hell is the point of security?
flyertalker00151 is offline  
Old Oct 7, 2005 | 1:28 pm
  #9  
Original Poster
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Europe & Middle East
Programs: BA GGL (LTG), Marriott LT Titanium, EK Plat, Amex Cent
Posts: 904
Originally Posted by Liam0s
I don't care who they are, if you start letting people through security, what the hell is the point of security?
Because there are a select few who, e.g. travelling heads of state, the Pope, Manchester United etc... where they are high profile guests of the governments of the country they are visiting. These people should just be waived through without having a sniffer dog checking whether they have fresh undies on!
nimeta is offline  
Old Oct 7, 2005 | 1:37 pm
  #10  
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Programs: AA, UA, DL,
Posts: 588
Hello,

I was the Orlando Airport (MCO) recently, and there's a huge sign that says "FEMA Workers" this way -- and it leads them past security -- just show your FEMA badge and you're on your way.

Which I don't think is fair. Heads of State I can understand about bypassing security, but *all* FEMA workers get a bye? It's not fair.

David
DavidHatt is offline  
Old Oct 7, 2005 | 2:47 pm
  #11  
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Orlando
Programs: DL 4MM/DM, UA 1MM/Gold, AA Paper
Posts: 1,386
Originally Posted by DavidHatt
I was the Orlando Airport (MCO) recently, and there's a huge sign that says "FEMA Workers" this way -- and it leads them past security -- just show your FEMA badge and you're on your way.
Actually the sign for FEMA Workers at MCO was at the entrance to the Clear Scam Line, which still requires the FEMA workers to go through security screening. It just means that they go to the front of the screening line and maybe get a little less hassle.

In regards to screening Prince Andrew, is the world any safer for doing it? I seriously doubt it. Just another dog and pony show for security's sake.
OrlandoFlyer is offline  
Old Oct 7, 2005 | 3:00 pm
  #12  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Watchlisted by the prejudiced, en route to purgatory
Programs: Just Say No to Fleecing and Blacklisting
Posts: 102,077
I am all in favor of "politicians" (and royal tools are lumped into that category) being subject to the same dog and pony show as the general population. Otherwise, they are far less likely to internalize the extent of idiocy that is demonstrated by the shoe carnival and the like (more the latter than the former given we are talking about Australia and not the United States).

Last edited by GUWonder; Oct 7, 2005 at 3:03 pm
GUWonder is offline  
Old Oct 7, 2005 | 3:05 pm
  #13  
Original Poster
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Europe & Middle East
Programs: BA GGL (LTG), Marriott LT Titanium, EK Plat, Amex Cent
Posts: 904
Originally Posted by GUWonder
I am all in favor of "politicians" (and royal tools are lumped into that category) being subject to the same dog and pony show as the general population. Otherwise, they are far less likely to internalize the extent of idiocy that is demonstrated by the shoe carnival and the like (more the latter than the former given we are talking about Australia and not the United States).
Actually this is the best comment on this thread!! If we had Mrs Bush's bush being sniffed by dogs every time she flew anywhere normality might be resumed!!
nimeta is offline  
Old Oct 7, 2005 | 3:10 pm
  #14  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
25 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: AU
Programs: former Olympic Airways Gold (yeah - still proud of that!)
Posts: 14,538
Originally Posted by GUWonder
I am all in favor of "politicians" (and royal tools are lumped into that category) being subject to the same dog and pony show as the general population. Otherwise, they are far less likely to internalize the extent of idiocy that is demonstrated by the shoe carnival and the like (more the latter than the former given we are talking about Australia and not the United States).
Yes GUWonder - agree that by subjecting the politicians to the rules they might think twice about them!

However - in response to other posters - there is a considerable difference between VIPs / CIPs / Celebs (who I think SHOULD all be screened - and usually are - for example Diana Ross' search at Heathrow) and those travelling on Diplomatic Passports.

The latter category should not be searched, and indeed are exempt under international law. I would think Prince Andrew would almost certainly have been travelling on a diplomatic passport?

Regards

WG
LHR/MEL/Europe FF is offline  
Old Oct 7, 2005 | 3:37 pm
  #15  
100 Countries Visited
All eyes on you!
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: LAX, SAN, ORD, MAA & COK
Programs: AA LT EXP 6+ MM, AC, DL (MM) & LT SkyClub, All Airlines 10+MM, Hilton LT Diamond, Bonvoy LT Plat
Posts: 761
Some Royal Family members or VIPs can be dangerous!

Originally Posted by nimeta
...Like the British Royal family are going to suddenly be suicide bombers or aircarft hijackers!!...
Yes you are correct in that it is highly unlikely that the members of the British Royal family will try anything crazy while traveling but look at cases like Saudi Arabia or Nepal where members of the royal family resorted to killings. King Faisal of Saudi Arabia was killed by his nephew Prince Faisali bin Musad and King Birendra of Nepal and most of his family were shot dead at a banquet by none other than the heir to the throne. Security screening may perhaps prevented the killings.

The last Iraqi tyrant ruler Saddam Hussein's older son murdered his father's cook in Egypt! He probably traveled on a diplomatic passport and perhaps carried guns.

Granted that these people did not commit their crimes while traveling IHMO the fact that they are members of a Royal family or travel on diplomatic passports should not exempt them from security screenings.
ROW2Aisle is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.