Puffing to start at PBI
#31
Suspended
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 4,953
Originally Posted by SDF_Traveler
It's EWR, what else do you expect?
Do you really think they're capable of applying common sense at, <gasp>, EWR?
I'm not even sure the TSA at EWR has hope... A family member of mine who is recovering from breast cancer went through EWR/C yesterday and the treatment she was objected to was deplorable (let's leave it at that).
SDF_Traveler
Do you really think they're capable of applying common sense at, <gasp>, EWR? I'm not even sure the TSA at EWR has hope... A family member of mine who is recovering from breast cancer went through EWR/C yesterday and the treatment she was objected to was deplorable (let's leave it at that).
SDF_Traveler
#32
Moderator, Omni, Omni/PR, Omni/Games, FlyerTalk Posting Legend




Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Between DCA and IAD
Programs: UA 1K MM; Hilton Diamond
Posts: 72,658
Originally Posted by SDF_Traveler
The only justification for shoe removal at TPA in the portal lane was only if you alarmed the WTMD because of your shoes. If you don't alarm, you're free to go.
#33
Original Poster
FlyerTalk Evangelist




Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Jupiter, FL
Programs: DL PM, Marriott Lifetime Titanium, Hilton Silver
Posts: 39,639
Originally Posted by bocastephen
I'm editing to add: PBI is a screening horror at the best of times, especially the DL concourse...adding this thing to the mix will get everyone to the airport 3 hours before departure to make it through by boarding time.
Some of the older screeners are painfully slow, and the ticket checkers are not the broghtest, but PBI is far better than a lot of airports its size, IMO.
#34
Suspended
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 903
Dear hiltonhead ,
To the air marshall comment not privatise get rid of them.
To the tsa screeners yes privatise them.
And in regard to illegals needing to be here because we need cheap labor. Either A- do your own lawn or B pay americans better wages nobody will work for fifty cents. The illegals should be kicked out kids born here need their usa citizenship revoked. Companies and citizens who hire illegals should face penalties and jail time.
To the air marshall comment not privatise get rid of them.
To the tsa screeners yes privatise them.
And in regard to illegals needing to be here because we need cheap labor. Either A- do your own lawn or B pay americans better wages nobody will work for fifty cents. The illegals should be kicked out kids born here need their usa citizenship revoked. Companies and citizens who hire illegals should face penalties and jail time.
#35
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 376
Originally Posted by sithlord
Dear hiltonhead ,
To the air marshall comment not privatise get rid of them.
To the tsa screeners yes privatise them.
And in regard to illegals needing to be here because we need cheap labor. Either A- do your own lawn or B pay americans better wages nobody will work for fifty cents. The illegals should be kicked out kids born here need their usa citizenship revoked. Companies and citizens who hire illegals should face penalties and jail time.
To the air marshall comment not privatise get rid of them.
To the tsa screeners yes privatise them.
And in regard to illegals needing to be here because we need cheap labor. Either A- do your own lawn or B pay americans better wages nobody will work for fifty cents. The illegals should be kicked out kids born here need their usa citizenship revoked. Companies and citizens who hire illegals should face penalties and jail time.
I strongly agree with your last sentence. That is the only way America will take the problem serious...by hitting the companies in the wallet. Making the TSA private will solve nothing. The pay and benifits would be lower..which leads to lower qualified employees (I met a married couple in their 50's working for private company at BNA right after 9-11..they tried to convince everyone that even though they took the checkpoint security job, they were being actively recruited by the C.I.A. as deep cover operatives
). I have met hundreds of TSA employees and have to say that the professionalism is a great deal higher....wait...wait...BUT, they still have a long way to go and constantly strive to work around some of the moronic policy that they are forced to abide. A great deal of them seem to have acquired a pessimistic attitude and remind me of street cops with 20 years on the beat. Management should make a policy of promoting and rewarding the pleasant ones that enjoy their jobs and can the ones that are there to feed off of the government teat. But we both know that won't happen. As far as the FAM discussion...dead horse. A house has not burned nor been broken into in my neighbor in decades, but I still want to keep the police and fire department around. From your earlier post, it seems that the heart of your objection is the 1st class seat. Move 1st class to the rear and then everyone can be happy.
Have a great day all!

