Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Groped at Gatwick

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 20, 2005 | 1:48 pm
  #1  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Southern NM
Programs: Skymiles Silver Medallion
Posts: 273
Groped at Gatwick

As I flew back from LGW on Tuesday, I was pleased to clear security without taking shoes off or removing my laptop from my case. When I asked the screener if he wanted me to take the laptop out, he said, "No, that's an American thing," which made me laugh.

But then, when I got to the departure GATE, there was another screening. One security lady went all through my bags and another one felt me up, WAY more than any TSA screener has ever done. All I had on was a thin knit dress and underwear, nothing bulky or baggy, and she ran her hands all over my torso and down both sides of both legs. There was no metal detector, wand, or beeping involved, it was just a gratuitous pat-down.

I thought this level of groping particularly odd.
stinky123 is offline  
Old Jul 20, 2005 | 2:03 pm
  #2  
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Brighton England
Programs: AA Plat, various hotels
Posts: 1,220
This is not carried out by BAA security, The secondary screening is carried out on flights to the US on behalf of the American government by independantly appointed people. A total waste of time as the security is perfectly good enough at the landside/airside search. My partner had something similar happen last year.
Im sorry it happened to you but please dont blame the Brits.
Gatwick Alan is offline  
Old Jul 20, 2005 | 2:05 pm
  #3  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Watchlisted by the prejudiced, en route to purgatory
Programs: Just Say No to Fleecing and Blacklisting
Posts: 102,077
Originally Posted by Gatwick Alan
This is not carried out by BAA security, The secondary screening is carried out on flights to the US on behalf of the American government by independantly appointed people. A total waste of time as the security is perfectly good enough at the landside/airside search. My partner had something similar happen last year.
Im sorry it happened to you but please dont blame the Brits.
That's right. The US airlines hire contractors (although the relationship thereof is not always the most transparent) which is suppose to supplement security.
GUWonder is offline  
Old Jul 20, 2005 | 3:46 pm
  #4  
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Orlando
Programs: DL 4MM/DM, UA 1MM/Gold, AA Paper
Posts: 1,386
A letter of complaint to the CEO of the airline concerned is appropriate, with a copy to the US Department of Transportation. This sort of groping is totally out of line and is probably illegal in the UK.
OrlandoFlyer is offline  
Old Jul 20, 2005 | 4:28 pm
  #5  
2M
50 Countries Visited
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: SEA/YVR/BLI
Programs: UA "Lifetime" Gold, AS Titanium, OW Emerald, HH Lifetime Diamond, IC Plat, Marriott Gold, Hertz Gold
Posts: 9,583
Originally Posted by GUWonder
That's right. The US airlines hire contractors (although the relationship thereof is not always the most transparent) which is suppose to supplement security.
We've experienced similarly "vigilant" screening more than once at the gate in MUC when boarding UA for IAD.
Fredd is offline  
Old Jul 20, 2005 | 4:58 pm
  #6  
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Arizona, USA
Posts: 2,422
Welcome to the hell of flying from Europe to the USA on a US-owned carrier. My personal favorite is at Roissy/Charles de Gaulle: I saw an ICTS agent going through a woman's HAIR.

It's all groping all the time on the US carriers.

Air France and some other carriers have gate security inspection, but it's nowhere near as elaborate as the American carriers.

There are many reasons to fly on a foreign carrier and this is one of them. I think the lack of free booze in economy class is worse, but the groping is pretty awful.

Too bad that most people will say that the security is a wonderful idea, it makes them feel better, and they love losing their dignity.
Mats is offline  
Old Jul 20, 2005 | 8:28 pm
  #7  
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Posts: 7,700
Originally Posted by stinky123
All I had on was a thin knit dress and underwear, nothing bulky or baggy, and she ran her hands all over my torso and down both sides of both legs. There was no metal detector, wand, or beeping involved, it was just a gratuitous pat-down.

I thought this level of groping particularly odd.
So what do you look like?
Mikey likes it is offline  
Old Jul 20, 2005 | 8:37 pm
  #8  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Just who do you think you're kidding?
Programs: I do this for a living.
Posts: 7,486
I can't believe I clicked on this thread! Talk about "bait and switch"!

On the main page it came up as:

Groped at Gatwick
Mikey likes it
OttoGraham is offline  
Old Jul 21, 2005 | 12:13 am
  #9  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 10,034
Oddly enough, I went through LHR today and noticed an odd thing.

I got to enter the boarding area through the First/Business Class entrance. Got no profiling, and was not subject to secondary rifling.

Then I noticed the coach class entrance, where about nine out of every 10 folks were getting their baggage rifled though. None of the people who walked through the elite line had to do that.
LessO2 is offline  
Old Jul 21, 2005 | 2:02 am
  #10  
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: London, UK
Programs: AA EXP 1MM, HH Gold, dirt loads of places.
Posts: 1,657
Originally Posted by LessO2
Oddly enough, I went through LHR today and noticed an odd thing.

I got to enter the boarding area through the First/Business Class entrance. Got no profiling, and was not subject to secondary rifling.

Then I noticed the coach class entrance, where about nine out of every 10 folks were getting their baggage rifled though. None of the people who walked through the elite line had to do that.
That is odd, as when you go through the first/business door you should be directed round to the front of the gate area, where the same moat dragon will look at your stub & decide whether or not to send you off for a 2ary.

That said, I've only ever been hassled at LHR when in coach. At LGW on the other hand
chartreuse is offline  
Old Jul 21, 2005 | 2:50 am
  #11  
30 Countries Visited2M20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Nr. Lugano
Programs: LH SEN, IHG Platinum, Marriott Lifetime Gold
Posts: 1,615
Having held a management position with one of these companies many years ago I know something about what goes on.

The main problem is common to the US or the UK (specifically these contractors): you pay peanuts and you get monkeys! These people are often on close to minimum wage and yet we expect them to have customer service skills, sensitivity, some awareness of what is going on in the world, etc.... For the kind of money that these companies are willing to pay, you don't really get highly qualified people.

The airlines are mandated to carry out these extra checks by the FAA (and are inspected at regular intervals - talk about a dog and pony show!). But obviously, finances being what they are, the airlines pressure the contractors to do the job with the minimum number of people and of course regularly put the contracts out to bid which further puts pressure on pay levels.

It always amazed me that security staff were in the job of actually protecting a company's assets and human lives and yet they were treated as third-class staff. If qualified staff were hired, they were given a decent wage, and appropriate training given (to both staff AND management), you would see a completely different situation. But we all know that just isn't going to happen because the cost of security would be exorbitant and it just doesn't "put bums in seats" as the expression goes.

I will finish with a (true) story that happened to me some 15 years ago at Heathrow when I was with TWA. I had a visit from the police early one morning to say that they had come to question one of my screeners from the late night shift. He had apparently wanted to inspect a passenger closely and had taken him to the nearest public lavatory to "pat" him down and inspect more closely. There really was no malicious intent and the guy was a really enthusiastic but polite young man, he just had a really strange idea of what his job entailed.....Needless to say profuse apologies were proferred (which the passenger, showing amazingly good grace accepted) and more training was given.

Then there's the one about the Nigerian we found sleeping in the x-ray machine after having missed his flight to Lagos (same check-in area)...ah but that really would be OT.

Last edited by Snoopy; Jul 21, 2005 at 2:51 am Reason: Typo
Snoopy is offline  
Old Jul 21, 2005 | 7:13 am
  #12  
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Augusta, GA, USA
Programs: DL FC, NW
Posts: 3,522
Originally Posted by Mats
Welcome to the hell of flying from Europe to the USA on a US-owned carrier. My personal favorite is at Roissy/Charles de Gaulle: I saw an ICTS agent going through a woman's HAIR.

It's all groping all the time on the US carriers.

Air France and some other carriers have gate security inspection, but it's nowhere near as elaborate as the American carriers.

There are many reasons to fly on a foreign carrier and this is one of them. I think the lack of free booze in economy class is worse, but the groping is pretty awful.

Too bad that most people will say that the security is a wonderful idea, it makes them feel better, and they love losing their dignity.

Flying back from CDG to IAH last month, they was no type of search at the departure gate. Everyone just gave their BP at the gate and off we went to the a/c. Maybe they figured only check certain flights there.
USCGamecock is offline  
Old Jul 21, 2005 | 7:43 am
  #13  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Watchlisted by the prejudiced, en route to purgatory
Programs: Just Say No to Fleecing and Blacklisting
Posts: 102,077
Originally Posted by USCGamecock
Flying back from CDG to IAH last month, they was no type of search at the departure gate. Everyone just gave their BP at the gate and off we went to the a/c. Maybe they figured only check certain flights there.
Were you on a CO-operated flight for CDG-IAH? US carriers do the secondary "gate check" more than most any other carriers on Europe-US routes.
GUWonder is offline  
Old Jul 21, 2005 | 8:28 am
  #14  
Moderator, Omni, Omni/PR, Omni/Games, FlyerTalk Posting Legend
20 Countries Visited
1M
40 Nights
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Between DCA and IAD
Programs: UA 1K MM; Hilton Diamond
Posts: 72,613
Originally Posted by LessO2
Oddly enough, I went through LHR today and noticed an odd thing.

I got to enter the boarding area through the First/Business Class entrance. Got no profiling, and was not subject to secondary rifling.

Then I noticed the coach class entrance, where about nine out of every 10 folks were getting their baggage rifled though. None of the people who walked through the elite line had to do that.
And yet we're told that the terrorists out there prefer to fly in F ... I think it's more a matter of the average coach pax more likely being a "security at any cost" person than the average F or C pax and thus more likely to accept that sort of behavior.
exerda is offline  
Old Jul 21, 2005 | 8:28 am
  #15  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 10,034
Originally Posted by GUWonder
Were you on a CO-operated flight for CDG-IAH? US carriers do the secondary "gate check" more than most any other carriers on Europe-US routes.
YES, very similar to the TSA secondary checks at the gates. You definitely wait for the same gendered person to go through first and get secondaried. They don't always pick out the first person, but just wait until they pick someone out before you go at CDG.
LessO2 is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.