"Please proceed for continuous screening"? (Curiosity)
#16
Suspended
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,441
Originally Posted by TSASuper
You know, many respectful people in our country had their first job with McD's. Are you saying that former McD's employees deserve less respect than yourself? I too was once a McD's employee. I assume you are going to judge my character and commitment by my previous employer?
I believe it's been pretty well documented that the TSA is the employer of last resort for many individuals, some of whom could not even get a job at McD's.
#17
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Alabama
Posts: 400
Originally Posted by red456
If you came directly to the TSA from McD's because no one else would employ you and you're acting like an a**h***, you bet I'm saying that.
I believe it's been pretty well documented that the TSA is the employer of last resort for many individuals, some of whom could not even get a job at McD's.
I believe it's been pretty well documented that the TSA is the employer of last resort for many individuals, some of whom could not even get a job at McD's.
During my assessment, we began with over 300 applicants. When all was said and done, I signed up along with the 32 others that passed.
I'm not saying that the recruiting process is perfect. We do get our bad apples that slip through the cracks. In time, they will be dealt with.
I'm sure that there are many former McD's employees that have been excellent screeners. In your previous post, you made no mention of their behaviour, just a generalization of all former McD's employees.
#18
Suspended
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,441
I'm sure that there are many former McD's employees that have been excellent screeners. In your previous post, you made no mention of their behaviour, just a generalization of all former McD's employees.
If you wanted to, you could have read into my post that all TSA employees formerly worked for McD's.
#19
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Alabama
Posts: 400
Originally Posted by red456
No, I did not generalize all former McD's employees.
If you wanted to, you could have read into my post that all TSA employees formerly worked for McD's.
If you wanted to, you could have read into my post that all TSA employees formerly worked for McD's.
Lame joke, I know!
#20

Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Arlington VA
Posts: 5,735
Originally Posted by TSASuper
During my assessment, we began with over 300 applicants. When all was said and done, I signed up along with the 32 others that passed.
#21

Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Arlington VA
Posts: 5,735
Originally Posted by TSASuper
No need to read into it that deep. However, that may explain why one of our screeners talks to himself every time a plane drives up...
Lame joke, I know!
Lame joke, I know!

Or even better -- TSA should install signs: "No Shirt, No Shoes, No Service" but then staff would be even more confused on what to do about the shoes.
#22
FlyerTalk Evangelist




Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: BWI
Programs: AA Gold, HH Diamond, National Emerald Executive, TSA Disparager Gold
Posts: 15,180
Originally Posted by AArlington
Would you like fries with that?
Or even better -- TSA should install signs: "No Shirt, No Shoes, No Service" but then staff would be even more confused on what to do about the shoes.
Or even better -- TSA should install signs: "No Shirt, No Shoes, No Service" but then staff would be even more confused on what to do about the shoes.
#23


Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Europe
Programs: M+M, VN
Posts: 575
You know, I'm not a fan of the way the TSA do things and I don't believe that what they actually do makes things more secure than the less obvious security we have at European airports. I do believe, however, that name calling and baiting of those TSA employees who feel brave enough to venture here is both petty and childish. I always viewed FT as an enlightened discussion forum and for the most part it is, unfortunately that doesn't seem to extend to the "Travel Safety/Security" forum.
As the other poster said, I'd rather see them here posting than not so perhaps posters can agree a "no pointless antagonism" rule (I know people are going to argue that shoe carnivals etc. are pointless antagonism) and keep attacks on the TSA to known facts not just "You're all just mentally deficient people fired from Taco Bell for not knowing the difference between a taco and a coke".
As the other poster said, I'd rather see them here posting than not so perhaps posters can agree a "no pointless antagonism" rule (I know people are going to argue that shoe carnivals etc. are pointless antagonism) and keep attacks on the TSA to known facts not just "You're all just mentally deficient people fired from Taco Bell for not knowing the difference between a taco and a coke".
Last edited by meiji; May 25, 2005 at 3:53 am
#24
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,867
It has got to be the worst job in the world. Like being a lawyer without the money. I wonder when the first TSA employee will go Postal? Will we have another word added to our society? Going TSA? Going megtronmeter?
I respect all the TSA folks who are still brave enough to post on this list.
I respect all the TSA folks who are still brave enough to post on this list.
#25
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Colorado
Programs: TSA
Posts: 2,745
ah ah ah
Originally Posted by red456
It's the same thing with some TSA employees. There are published procedures that screeners are supposed to be following; many of us are just trying to make them do their job according to their SOP.
When a pax refuses to remove his/her non-profile shoes and then is sent to secondary because of that, it is nothing but a power play by the screener and does nothing to improve security. A complaint should be filed against that screener.
If it doesn't bother you, please go right ahead and take your shoes off, walk on the filthy floors in your stocking feet, let yourself be ordered around by former McD's employees.
I choose to respect myself too much to allow someone to treat me like a potential terrorist. If I am doing nothing wrong, you will not treat me as if I am and get away with it.
By the way, the itimidation game can be played two ways. As someone suggested in another post (maybe not in this thread), there are ways to imply that one might be doing a spot check of screeners without saying anything that is false. Bullies are easily intimidated.
#26
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Colorado
Programs: TSA
Posts: 2,745
ummm
Originally Posted by red456
I believe it's been pretty well documented that the TSA is the employer of last resort for many individuals, some of whom could not even get a job at McD's.
#27
Join Date: Dec 2004
Programs: AA, WN RR
Posts: 3,122
Recently I flew out of LBF in North Platte, Nebraska, on a Beech 1900 twin turboprop to DIA. This plane seats at most 18 passengers. LBF has one security checkpoint, staffed by 5 TSA screeners (3 male, 2 female) at about 5:00 p.m. CDT. My boarding pass did not have the dreaded SSSS in the corner. I followed the instructions of the TSA screener before walking through the metal detector, even to the point of removing my penny loafers that do not alarm but have heel-sole combination just over 1" thick. After the WTMD did not alarm, she told me to follow the instructions of the TSA screener to her right. I was wanded and patted down, lower torso only. Bags were not searched.
I saw one other passenger wanded and patted down, another attorney who was in North Platte for the same deposition I attended. She is a strawberry blond, 15 weeks pregnant, and did not have SSSS on her boarding pass. When some other passengers who were attorneys at our deposition commented on our grumbling, I pointed out to them that much of the cargo carried on passenger airliners is not screened. Pat downs of American passengers is a useless gesture in light of the failure to examine all cargo loaded onto commercial airliners. We ought to hammer that point home, that if security is actually the goal, rather than the appearance of security (kabuki security), TSA must search cargo with the same zeal that it searches passengers.
I saw one other passenger wanded and patted down, another attorney who was in North Platte for the same deposition I attended. She is a strawberry blond, 15 weeks pregnant, and did not have SSSS on her boarding pass. When some other passengers who were attorneys at our deposition commented on our grumbling, I pointed out to them that much of the cargo carried on passenger airliners is not screened. Pat downs of American passengers is a useless gesture in light of the failure to examine all cargo loaded onto commercial airliners. We ought to hammer that point home, that if security is actually the goal, rather than the appearance of security (kabuki security), TSA must search cargo with the same zeal that it searches passengers.

