chuckle for all you victims
#1
Original Poster
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Colorado
Programs: TSA
Posts: 2,745
chuckle for all you victims
We were told in briefing today that a pax had his TSA approved locks cut off by baggage inspectors at DEN. He contacted TSA to complain. The interesting thing is that TSA baggage screeners left a piece of equipment in his bag that we use alot. He is holding it ransom till TSA gets him new locks.
#3
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Current Micronesian, Ex Buckeye....
Programs: All My $$$ Went to CO (Plat) with a Lifetime PClub membership that got degraded to United crap...
Posts: 2,089
Originally Posted by eyecue
We were told in briefing today that a pax had his TSA approved locks cut off by baggage inspectors at DEN. He contacted TSA to complain. The interesting thing is that TSA baggage screeners left a piece of equipment in his bag that we use alot. He is holding it ransom till TSA gets him new locks.
#6
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Between AUS, EWR, and YTO In a little twisty maze of airline seats, all alike.. but I wanna go home with the armadillo
Programs: CO, NW, & UA forum moderator emeritus
Posts: 35,415
If the bag had been properly locked the TSA couldn't have accidentally left its valuable equipment inside it.
#9
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 704
Originally Posted by eyecue
But the equipment is a 250 dollar item.
I doubt the hand held metal detector costs $250. I just picked some up for my personnel at $160 each. If the gov't paid $250 each (or paid $250 for the gloves), I'm in the wrong business.
#11
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Brooklyn, NY, USA
Programs: AA Plat, HHonors Gold, Marriot Silver
Posts: 952
Actually, he can be charges with Larceny just as if he purposley stole it. According to most states penal laws, "finders keepers" is not a valid theory. It is larceny to "with the intent to deprive another of property... he wrongfully takes, obtains, or withols such property from the owner thereof".
NY Penal Law, § 155.05 (2b) specifically mentions that aquirnig lost property without making a reasonable attempt to find the owner and return it to him. Since the item is worth one thousad dollars or less it is defined as Peitit Larceny by § 155.25. That is an A Misdameanor.
So eyecue, feel free to press charges (but paying for his lock is more statesmenlike)
NY Penal Law, § 155.05 (2b) specifically mentions that aquirnig lost property without making a reasonable attempt to find the owner and return it to him. Since the item is worth one thousad dollars or less it is defined as Peitit Larceny by § 155.25. That is an A Misdameanor.
So eyecue, feel free to press charges (but paying for his lock is more statesmenlike)
#12
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: BOS and vicinity
Programs: Former UA 1P
Posts: 3,725
Originally Posted by Psychocadet
NY Penal Law, § 155.05 (2b) specifically mentions that aquirnig lost property without making a reasonable attempt to find the owner and return it to him. Since the item is worth one thousad dollars or less it is defined as Peitit Larceny by § 155.25. That is an A Misdameanor.
So eyecue, feel free to press charges (but paying for his lock is more statesmenlike)
If it were me and TSA were not going to replace my locks, I'd take the thing on an international trip and then mail it back to TSA from some extremely remote location via the most expensive express mail with an insured/estimated value of a couple thousand dollars (for customs purposes, and since I could claim ignorance as to the value of the device), postage due.
#13
Join Date: Dec 2004
Programs: AA, WN RR
Posts: 3,122
Originally Posted by Psychocadet
Actually, he can be charges with Larceny just as if he purposley stole it. According to most states penal laws, "finders keepers" is not a valid theory. It is larceny to "with the intent to deprive another of property... he wrongfully takes, obtains, or withols such property from the owner thereof".
NY Penal Law, § 155.05 (2b) specifically mentions that aquirnig lost property without making a reasonable attempt to find the owner and return it to him. Since the item is worth one thousad dollars or less it is defined as Peitit Larceny by § 155.25. That is an A Misdameanor.
So eyecue, feel free to press charges (but paying for his lock is more statesmenlike)
NY Penal Law, § 155.05 (2b) specifically mentions that aquirnig lost property without making a reasonable attempt to find the owner and return it to him. Since the item is worth one thousad dollars or less it is defined as Peitit Larceny by § 155.25. That is an A Misdameanor.
So eyecue, feel free to press charges (but paying for his lock is more statesmenlike)
#14
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 704
Originally Posted by eyecue
"Or $250 for the plastic wand thingy for the explosion detection machine?"
That wasnt your bag was it??
That wasnt your bag was it??
The idiot who approved to buy those things at $250 each should be fired. That money could be used for something else, like raises.