Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Worst Security Plan Ever: Greyhound

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 31, 2004 | 2:08 pm
  #1  
Original Poster
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Conversation Starter
All eyes on you!
25 Years on Site
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: أمريكا
Posts: 26,931
Worst Security Plan Ever: Greyhound

I was catching a bus to Boston from the Port Authority two Fridays ago.

Apparently the bus to Foxwoods is a terrorist favorite, because Greyhound was searching people's baggage and using a handheld metal detector on them.

The best part about it was that they weren't searching you right before you boarded the bus (which would make sense), they were searching you while you were waiting in line by calling you up to the front of the line, searching/metal detecting, then letting you go back to the end of the line.

The terminal was crowded and there was no attempt to make sure that people who had already been OKed didn't get out of line, go pick up something dangerous and then get back in line, or have someone pass you something while you were waiting in line. Once you were screened initially, you were clear.

I think this is the worse "security" plan I've seen yet. Even aside from the inconvenience of it, it provided no security at all. Not a bit.
Doppy is offline  
Old Oct 31, 2004 | 2:15 pm
  #2  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 11,242
Originally Posted by Doppy
I was catching a bus to Boston from the Port Authority two Fridays ago.
What kind of grave sin did you commit to deserve such a fate?
Japhydog is offline  
Old Oct 31, 2004 | 2:29 pm
  #3  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: In the home of the "brave"?
Programs: Whatever will get me out of Y and into C or F!
Posts: 3,748
http://www.limoliner.com/

If you are going to do NYC to Boston by bus, please consider the LimoLiner!

http://www.limoliner.com/

Last edited by HeHateY; Oct 31, 2004 at 2:30 pm Reason: spelling
HeHateY is offline  
Old Oct 31, 2004 | 2:29 pm
  #4  
50 Countries Visited
5M
All eyes on you!
25 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Dallas
Programs: AA EXP/5MM; DL DM; HHonors DIAM; Marriott GLD
Posts: 4,132
Bizarre and stupid... many Mexican bus lines screen pax, but it is done with a hand held metal detector at the entrance to the bus.
HKG_Flyer1 is offline  
Old Oct 31, 2004 | 4:06 pm
  #5  
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 1,673
Originally Posted by Doppy
I was catching a bus to Boston from the Port Authority two Fridays ago.

Apparently the bus to Foxwoods is a terrorist favorite, because Greyhound was searching people's baggage and using a handheld metal detector on them.

The best part about it was that they weren't searching you right before you boarded the bus (which would make sense), they were searching you while you were waiting in line by calling you up to the front of the line, searching/metal detecting, then letting you go back to the end of the line.

The terminal was crowded and there was no attempt to make sure that people who had already been OKed didn't get out of line, go pick up something dangerous and then get back in line, or have someone pass you something while you were waiting in line. Once you were screened initially, you were clear.

I think this is the worse "security" plan I've seen yet. Even aside from the inconvenience of it, it provided no security at all. Not a bit.
Amateurs
TSAMGR is offline  
Old Oct 31, 2004 | 5:41 pm
  #6  
Original Poster
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Conversation Starter
All eyes on you!
25 Years on Site
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: أمريكا
Posts: 26,931
Originally Posted by HeHateY
If you are going to do NYC to Boston by bus, please consider the LimoLiner!
LimoLiner's problem, as I see it, is that it's about the same price as Acela.

And Acela's big advantage is that it's not subject to highway traffic.
Doppy is offline  
Old Nov 1, 2004 | 10:52 am
  #7  
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 1,673
Originally Posted by Doppy
LimoLiner's problem, as I see it, is that it's about the same price as Acela.

And Acela's big advantage is that it's not subject to highway traffic.
Just derailments and striking vehicles and people at crossings.
TSAMGR is offline  
Old Nov 1, 2004 | 12:29 pm
  #8  
Original Poster
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Conversation Starter
All eyes on you!
25 Years on Site
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: أمريكا
Posts: 26,931
Originally Posted by TSAMGR
Just derailments and striking vehicles and people at crossings.
Yes, but it's safer than highway travel. Especially with the Chinatown drivers who are talking on two handheld cell phones at the same time while doing 75 on the shoulder
Doppy is offline  
Old Nov 1, 2004 | 1:33 pm
  #9  
60 Nights
50 Countries Visited
3M
25 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Palm Beach/ New England
Programs: AA EXP 3MM, DL GM, Marriott Platinum
Posts: 4,459
Originally Posted by TSAMGR
Just derailments and striking vehicles and people at crossings.
I'd rather be in an Acela (actually the older Metroliners are even more massive) than in a car or an airplane when striking a vehicle or terrain.

There was a derailment at New Haven a few days ago. No injuries. When was the last death on an Amtrak train, not including pedestrians or vehicles at grade crossings -- just the real train passengers -- in the Boston-Washington sector (where Amtrak controls the dispatching)? I know there have been a few in Virginia in the past few years.
fastflyer is offline  
Old Nov 1, 2004 | 3:19 pm
  #10  
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 1,673
Originally Posted by Doppy
Yes, but it's safer than highway travel. Especially with the Chinatown drivers who are talking on two handheld cell phones at the same time while doing 75 on the shoulder
We use to call that DWO

Driving While Oriental


(No offense, just fact)
TSAMGR is offline  
Old Nov 1, 2004 | 9:28 pm
  #11  
Original Poster
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Conversation Starter
All eyes on you!
25 Years on Site
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: أمريكا
Posts: 26,931
Originally Posted by fastflyer
I'd rather be in an Acela (actually the older Metroliners are even more massive) than in a car or an airplane when striking a vehicle or terrain.
I wish they'd get seatbelts on these things, however. I'm willing to bet that most of the injuries in a bus or train accident are caused by people being thrown around.


Having been in a bus accident a few months ago, my first hand empirical evidence confirms my opinion. (Fortunately, I'm good in emergencies; I immediately braced myself using the seat in front of me and was one of the few people out of ~55 who walked away perfectly fine.)
Doppy is offline  
Old Nov 2, 2004 | 12:54 am
  #12  
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: London, UK
Programs: AA EXP 1MM, HH Gold, dirt loads of places.
Posts: 1,657
When I travel by train (not that often) I always pick a seat facing backwards to the direction of travel. My companions are usually puzzled - conventional wisdom being that a forward facing seat is preferable. I reply that it's safer in the event of a crash or sudden stop.
chartreuse is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.