Community
Wiki Posts
Search

"Security" -- Not a Partisan Issue

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 14, 2004 | 12:42 pm
  #31  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 55,213
Originally Posted by ender83
I echo bocastephen's sentiments.
...
You are entitled to your opinion, however wrong it may be.

(Please take that as a friendly joke, as it was intended!)
Absolutely, clearly even a plane filled with nude passengers with no luggage is not 100% impenetrable.
Analise is offline  
Old Oct 14, 2004 | 12:44 pm
  #32  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 11,242
Originally Posted by Analise
Absolutely, clearly even a plane filled with nude passengers with no luggage is not 100% impenetrable.
Oooh! Nekkid passengers and not impenetrable -- cheeky! ^

Last edited by Japhydog; Oct 14, 2004 at 2:22 pm Reason: Thought 'nekkid' was funnier than naked
Japhydog is offline  
Old Oct 14, 2004 | 12:45 pm
  #33  
Used to be Sydneysider
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: CPH
Programs: AS MVP/Gold (and 75K aspirant)
Posts: 2,984
Talking

Originally Posted by Analise
Absolutely, clearly even a plane filled with nude passengers with no luggage is not 100% impenetrable.


Savvy Traveler is offline  
Old Oct 14, 2004 | 2:08 pm
  #34  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
40 Countries Visited
3M
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Living the dream in Antigua and the nightmare in Florida
Programs: AA PLAT 2MM, *A Gold, Hilton Diamond
Posts: 56,538
Civics 101

Originally Posted by CameraGuy
You are forgetting about the fillibuster. No bill was going to reach the presidents desk that did not include Federal Screeners because Daschle and Gephardt threatened fillibusters.
There is no filibuster rule in the House as in the Senate. House votes are straight up and down, unless the majority party refuses to put a bill on the floor. I don't recall exactly who started this bill, but it could not have made the House floor without the approval of the Republican leadership.

I really don't see how two congressmen can be faulted for the birth of TSA.
SJCFlyerLG is offline  
Old Oct 14, 2004 | 5:50 pm
  #35  
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Northeast MA, USA.
Programs: HHonors Diamond, DL Silver, TSA Harassee
Posts: 3,657
I know that the house cannot fillibuster, but it was those two con men who "forced" the TSA upon us.

The reasoning behind this thought is easy:

In the hysteria following 9/11, the public was demanding that congress "Do Something". The Republican Leadership had a viable plan that did NOT include federal employees. Enter Daschle and Gephardt, they threatened to fillibuster in the Senate any bill that did not include federal screeners. They also threatened to portray the Republicans as doing "nothing" in the wake of 9/11 if the bill did not include federal screeners. The Republicans were in a no-win situation, the Democrats knew it and took advantage of it.

So, yes it was these two jackasses who are responsible for the TSA.

In addition to that, Daschle included language very favorable to the company that employed his wife. That language forced the TSA to purchase inferior equipment from his wife's employer.
CameraGuy is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.