Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Plane passes to be checked for explosives

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 13, 2004 | 8:12 pm
  #46  
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Chicago, IL
Programs: 11 Longhaired Friends of Jesus; Chartreuse Microbus; just demoted to AA nonentity
Posts: 282
Sure enough, I was looking at RDX and talking about NG. Anyway, Spiff, if you get a chance to toss any references my way, I'd be most interested--everything I have here dates from 1998 and is more or less exclusively looking for the NO2 moiety rather than the organic base.
Wheezer is offline  
Old Sep 13, 2004 | 9:42 pm
  #47  
Moderator: Coupon Connection & S.P.A.M
50 Countries Visited
5M
All eyes on you!
25 Years on Site
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Louisville, KY
Programs: Destination Unknown, TSA Disparager Diamond (LTDD)
Posts: 58,133
I'll see what I can dig up.
Spiff is offline  
Old Sep 22, 2004 | 5:25 am
  #48  
doc
Original Poster
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: May 1999
Posts: 46,817
Originally Posted by Spiff
I'll see what I can dig up.
Still digging I guess?

Just curious!

-Mark
doc is offline  
Old Sep 22, 2004 | 9:58 pm
  #49  
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Chicago, IL
Programs: 11 Longhaired Friends of Jesus; Chartreuse Microbus; just demoted to AA nonentity
Posts: 282
I've been digging on and off, and my best guess is that the hand-lotion, etc., false positives spottily reported in the press and attributed to things that sound like the "glyceri-" in nitroglycerine are, in fact, false positives rather than any attempt to target the organic base. I haven't learned nearly enough about ion mobility spectrometry (which I'm guessing to be the detection method in these cases) to speculate what actual compounds might be the culprits, or even whether they would be aminated, for that matter. If anyone wants to share, I'm all ears.

Last edited by Wheezer; Sep 22, 2004 at 10:33 pm Reason: Typo
Wheezer is offline  
Old Sep 23, 2004 | 5:34 am
  #50  
Moderator: Coupon Connection & S.P.A.M
50 Countries Visited
5M
All eyes on you!
25 Years on Site
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Louisville, KY
Programs: Destination Unknown, TSA Disparager Diamond (LTDD)
Posts: 58,133
No, I haven't. It's been a busy couple of days.
Spiff is offline  
Old Sep 23, 2004 | 8:49 am
  #51  
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Colorado
Programs: TSA
Posts: 2,745
a Link

Originally Posted by Wheezer
I've been digging on and off, and my best guess is that the hand-lotion, etc., false positives spottily reported in the press and attributed to things that sound like the "glyceri-" in nitroglycerine are, in fact, false positives rather than any attempt to target the organic base. I haven't learned nearly enough about ion mobility spectrometry (which I'm guessing to be the detection method in these cases) to speculate what actual compounds might be the culprits, or even whether they would be aminated, for that matter. If anyone wants to share, I'm all ears.
I could shed a lot of light on this but suffice it to say that I cant. Here is a link for you though: http://194.105.117.18/products/Defau...Transportation
eyecue is offline  
Old Sep 23, 2004 | 9:58 am
  #52  
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: BOS and vicinity
Programs: Former UA 1P
Posts: 3,730
CNN is reporting the document residue-scanners are being used at ORD, LAX, JFK, and DCA as of 9/22. The article implies that only SSSSelectees, alarm-ees, and those who are "selected by security workers" will be scanned.

http://www.cnn.com/2004/TRAVEL/09/23....ap/index.html

"If you trigger the device, you will go through a questioning process as to what have you touched, where have you been, what have you done?" Zunk said.
If TSA does this right, it could be an actual security improvement. If 85-year-olds taking nitro are delayed for "questioning" so long that they miss their flight or denied boarding, it will be another fiasco.
studentff is offline  
Old Sep 23, 2004 | 10:22 pm
  #53  
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Chicago, IL
Programs: 11 Longhaired Friends of Jesus; Chartreuse Microbus; just demoted to AA nonentity
Posts: 282
Originally Posted by eyecue
I could shed a lot of light on this but suffice it to say that I cant. Here is a link for you though [...] [/url]
Yes, yes, I'm aware of all this. It speaks not a whit to the false positives I'm talking about. (Put another way, when I said I didn't know enough about IMS, I didn't say that I had never performed mass spectrometry.)
Wheezer is offline  
Old Sep 28, 2004 | 12:22 pm
  #54  
doc
Original Poster
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: May 1999
Posts: 46,817
I also agree that false positives can be a real problem - much like false negatives!

Either can render a system as nearly useless.

It's all about getting it done properly, I agree!

-Mark
doc is offline  
Old Sep 28, 2004 | 2:43 pm
  #55  
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 126
I guess I should not shoot bottle rockets or blow off fireworks while holding my boarding pass.
MgmtConsult1974 is offline  
Old Oct 5, 2004 | 7:16 am
  #56  
doc
Original Poster
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: May 1999
Posts: 46,817
Originally Posted by MgmtConsult1974
I guess I should not shoot bottle rockets or blow off fireworks while holding my boarding pass.
---

Depends on where you want to spend the night, no?

-Mark
doc is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.