Read the following today, and it seems this is at least some proof to all that believe the government is the only line of defense in security now days.

http://www.aopa.org/whatsnew/newsite...0812watch.html

Hat's off to the alert folks for doing what they always do, protect significant investment in aircraft, and to NBC for trying to create journalism.

Not to say that TSA does not have a place somewhere, I just think stepping into the NYC private helicopter charter screening business is not one of them.

While I'm not out to offend anyone, I think the question of needing TSA to perform all screening is a valid one. Thoughts??

It is a valid question. My opinion is the government should stay out of screening general aviation charter companies, and the like. Should there be rules, regs, inspections to ensure compliance and the safety of the travelling public-you bet.

When speaking to the specific question of helicopter charters, the size alone tells you they cannot be used for a 9-11 style attack. They do not have the fuel, mass, ect. to create that kind of destruction. Could someone get hurt if a criminal/terrorist/crackpot tried to use this means of transport. Sure could, but the same goes for a taxi, bus, ryder truck. No comparision to using a 400,000 lb., fully fueled 767, two hundred people on board, and can get to its target at 450-500 mph.

Just my opinion.

AOPA
So the crew used a government (TSA) developed program to report this suspicious circumstance.

The NYC private helicopter charter screening is for the RNC. Helicopters and private aircraft wanting access to NYC airspace will be directed to one of several smaller airports to have the aircraft and personnel searched before continuing.

The security is being run by the government so it only makes sense for the government component in charge of transportation security and screening be involved. TSA's role in the RNC is not isolated to just screening.

Actually, Airport Watch is an AOPA developed program that has been around since before TSA existed. TSA was urged to adopt the program, in lieu of forcing new federal regulation onto GA airports and aircraft owners.

Yes, there is a place.

The security of the aircraft is a private company issue. Quite honestly, I do not have a personal interest in the safety of an aircaft that I am not flying on. That is the risk and trust in deciding on a reputable, safe carrier.

However, I do have an interest in whether that aircraft is going to fall onto my head while I am in my office, out playing golf, or even protesting at the RNC (which I actually wouldn't do). That is the government's responsibility.