Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Registered traveler program

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 27, 2004 | 1:06 pm
  #16  
Moderator: Coupon Connection & S.P.A.M
50 Countries Visited
5M
All eyes on you!
25 Years on Site
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Louisville, KY
Programs: Destination Unknown, TSA Disparager Diamond (LTDD)
Posts: 58,133
Originally Posted by robodeer
doubtful that they would decide on "neither."
Then screw "them".

"They" should be terminated.
Spiff is offline  
Old Jul 27, 2004 | 1:18 pm
  #17  
robodeer
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Originally Posted by GradGirl
Okay, Robodeer. Even taking your assumptions, that registered traveler is the only way for FF's to avoid being SSSS'ed for now, that's still by far not big enough of a carrot. Remember, nothing in the government's agreement sets in stone these procedures for the future. They might sign up 80% of the public, and then change their minds about letting people avoid SSSS, or change the procedures for searching registered travelers to be more invasive than the current SSSS deal. But people who sign up have given their blanket okay for the government to continue to investigate them for years and years and keep those records in perpetuity. Registered travelers have zero bargaining chips left after they sign those papers, so what's to guarantee the government holds up its end of the deal?

Look, there's a reason, a very good reason, that CAPPSII got killed. There is, maybe a minority of people, but a very serious percentage of people who think government surveillance and investigation of law-abiding citizens is dangerous and un-American. The registered traveller program is obviously a repackaging of CAPPSII, but it makes no sense in current form. It only makes sense as part of a plan to eventually force everyone into this program.

If you really care, you can rearrange your travel plans to avoid one-ways, get a credit card, et cetera, to avoid the SSSS usually. Or you can just manipulate a BP in photoshop or buy a fully-refundable ticket to the same terminal.
we could speculate about what program might come in the future, neither of us know. i understand the concern once you sign those papers-but it seems that the registered travel program was a voluntary way to avoid extra screening, nothing more. born out of many complaints from FF's and congress representatives alike. ill-conceived or not, it seems to be a way to appease the FF folks complaining about the SSSS's. like i stated previously, its my hypothesis that they won't drop such a system. thus the resulting registered traveller program.

i agree partially with the second paragraph, although i reference the previous assumption about having to "check." the registered travellers program being that check in lieu of the SSSS's. whether it was a bait-and-switch to get those wary of such a system to join i can't tell either way.

document forgery aside though, thats one option.
 
Old Jul 27, 2004 | 1:19 pm
  #18  
robodeer
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Originally Posted by Spiff
"They" should be terminated.
again, doubtful if that will happen.

each of us has to react accordingly.
 
Old Jul 27, 2004 | 2:19 pm
  #19  
JS
Original Poster
Suspended
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: GSP (Greenville, SC)
Programs: DL Gold Medallion; UA Premier Executive; WN sub-CP; AA sub-Gold
Posts: 13,393
This is why I am voting Libertarian this November. The Republicrats in Congress and Presididate Burry/Chenwards show no interest in disbanding the TSA or any other facet of our bloated federal government.
JS is offline  
Old Jul 27, 2004 | 3:09 pm
  #20  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
20 Countries Visited
3M
Conversation Starter
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Programs: UALifetimePremierGold, Marriott LifetimeTitanium
Posts: 74,119
I'm not willing to join the registered traveler program for not only the privacy issues, but also because if you set off the magnodetector (which after years of not doing I now do every single time), I still have to go through secondary. Registering for the program doesn't get you out of that.

I also will be very pis*ed off if they replace the elite lines w/ the registered traveler line, which would be a way to force you to join the 'voluntary' program, as was mentioned as a possible in the UA forum thread. I've earned my elite status through flying 100K/year. I shouldn't have to go to the line for the folk who rarely travel just because I don't want to register for the program.

Sharon

Last edited by SkiAdcock; Jul 27, 2004 at 3:11 pm
SkiAdcock is offline  
Old Jul 27, 2004 | 4:29 pm
  #21  
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Washington DC; UA 1MM, Marriott Lifetime Plat
Posts: 959
Originally Posted by SkiAdcock
I'm not willing to join the registered traveler program for not only the privacy issues, but also because if you set off the magnodetector (which after years of not doing I now do every single time), I still have to go through secondary. Registering for the program doesn't get you out of that.

Sharon
So wait, you want to be able to walk through the metal detector with a gun and/or bomb, set off the alarm, and still be able to walk through without secondary screening? Does this make any sense? Think about it...

Everyone here needs to take a step back and think. Have you asked the people running the show what the future holds? I have, and here's what they say:

The current process is only in place to test the devices, not the system. That is why the process is voluntary, and is why they want our feedfack. Further, this is why we feed right back into the regular elite line.

Will it always be this way? No...when the right system is developed and tweaked, there will be dedicated RT security lines.

Will RT's ever be able to bybass metal detectors and/or X-Ray? I HOPE NOT! Such a process might make me stop flying. Sharon, if you set off the metal detector, you better pray they send you to secondary!

Think, people!

Randomman
randomman is offline  
Old Jul 27, 2004 | 4:32 pm
  #22  
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Washington DC; UA 1MM, Marriott Lifetime Plat
Posts: 959
Lets start talking about what we want from the system.

Instead of complaining about what we don't like about the current system, lets talk about what we would like to see. I'll start with this one:

Set the verification device up at the point where they currently check your BP and ID. Have the system linked to your FF #, whereby it knows when you have a same-day ticket booked. This way, we can walk up to the device, insert the card, scan the fingers/eyes, and head right to the metal detectors. Then I can use the Mr. Easy Check-In devices inside the terminal.

This would save a step, and make the system a little more worthwhile.


Randomman
randomman is offline  
Old Jul 27, 2004 | 5:04 pm
  #23  
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: USA
Posts: 1,017
Originally Posted by randomman
Instead of complaining about what we don't like about the current system, lets talk about what we would like to see.
I'd like to see them spend the money they're wasting on government surveillance of law-abiding citizens to improve our domestic and foreign intelligence agencies, starting with language skills and ending with an approach to terrorism that focuses on real threats. I'd like them to stop paying thousands of people to fondle my luggage and my breasts, and spend the money on securing ports, cargo, borders, et cetera.
GradGirl is offline  
Old Jul 27, 2004 | 5:16 pm
  #24  
robodeer
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Originally Posted by GradGirl
I'd like to see them spend the money they're wasting on government surveillance of law-abiding citizens to improve our domestic and foreign intelligence agencies, starting with language skills and ending with an approach to terrorism that focuses on real threats. I'd like them to stop paying thousands of people to fondle my luggage and my breasts, and spend the money on securing ports, cargo, borders, et cetera.
right now going through screening is like everyone going through a net, or filter.

focusing more on domestic intelligence i would think ties in with the privacy issue.

i agree with the sentiment towards bulking up their capabilities, but it seems like some of the points brought up conflict in that regard.

same with border/customs. that means someone asking you questions, or putting you under scrutiny.

i take it from the previous thread that not many would be for any of these. i may be wrong though.
 
Old Jul 27, 2004 | 5:32 pm
  #25  
JS
Original Poster
Suspended
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: GSP (Greenville, SC)
Programs: DL Gold Medallion; UA Premier Executive; WN sub-CP; AA sub-Gold
Posts: 13,393
Originally Posted by randomman
Instead of complaining about what we don't like about the current system, lets talk about what we would like to see. I'll start with this one:

Set the verification device up at the point where they currently check your BP and ID. Have the system linked to your FF #, whereby it knows when you have a same-day ticket booked. This way, we can walk up to the device, insert the card, scan the fingers/eyes, and head right to the metal detectors. Then I can use the Mr. Easy Check-In devices inside the terminal.

This would save a step, and make the system a little more worthwhile.


Randomman
Where is the savings? You still have to identify yourself, walk through the metal detector, and have your belongings X-rayed. It's exactly the same thing as every security checkpoint today.
JS is offline  
Old Jul 27, 2004 | 11:43 pm
  #26  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
20 Countries Visited
3M
Conversation Starter
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Programs: UALifetimePremierGold, Marriott LifetimeTitanium
Posts: 74,119
randomman, in years & years i've not set off the magno & suddenly in the last few months i'm now doing so every single time, wearing the SAME clothes/shoes that NEVER set off the machines before & according to YOU I'm supposed to feel THANKFUL that I get sent to secondary. I don't think so.

you want to do the registered traveller program & give up your rights to do it - that's fine - that IS your right - but don't you EVER give me a hard time about not giving up mine.

Edited to add: btw, neither before when I never set off the magno nor now when I do every time, have I had a bomb on my person, nor have the rivets in my jeans had a wmd, nor have my bare feet had anything implanted (aka manchurian candidate).

Last edited by SkiAdcock; Jul 30, 2004 at 2:23 pm
SkiAdcock is offline  
Old Jul 28, 2004 | 12:52 am
  #27  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Watchlisted by the prejudiced, en route to purgatory
Programs: Just Say No to Fleecing and Blacklisting
Posts: 102,077
Americans won't stand for this identity-as-security nonsense for long. Hopefully, we won't stand for it before it sets in any further.
GUWonder is offline  
Old Jul 28, 2004 | 8:26 am
  #28  
Moderator: Coupon Connection & S.P.A.M
50 Countries Visited
5M
All eyes on you!
25 Years on Site
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Louisville, KY
Programs: Destination Unknown, TSA Disparager Diamond (LTDD)
Posts: 58,133
Originally Posted by randomman
So wait, you want to be able to walk through the metal detector with a gun and/or bomb, set off the alarm, and still be able to walk through without secondary screening? Does this make any sense? Think about it...
If I give up my personal information and submit to a background check, then yes, I do expect access to airside along the lines of that of a law enforcement officer. So, while a bomb is unnecessary and probably illegal, I should be able to carry a gun after enrolling successfully in the registered traveler program. Simply granting faster airside access that should already be given to everyone in exchange for personal info and a background check is extortion. No one should have to enroll to avoid un-American haraSSSSment or the Shoe Carnival.


Originally Posted by randomman
Think, people!
That suggestion should be directed to the criminals in charge of the TSA and not to the travelers affected by their filthy, communist policies.
Spiff is offline  
Old Aug 2, 2004 | 9:01 pm
  #29  
Permanently Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,129
I know that some people are getting emotional about this. I personally don't think this is of any value. Playing devil's advocate - can anyone give me a few benefits of WHY it's beneficial for me to join a program like this? I can't think of any.
MrFurious is offline  
Old Aug 2, 2004 | 11:49 pm
  #30  
JS
Original Poster
Suspended
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: GSP (Greenville, SC)
Programs: DL Gold Medallion; UA Premier Executive; WN sub-CP; AA sub-Gold
Posts: 13,393
Originally Posted by MrFurious
I know that some people are getting emotional about this. I personally don't think this is of any value. Playing devil's advocate - can anyone give me a few benefits of WHY it's beneficial for me to join a program like this? I can't think of any.
Also playing devil's advocate, I have stated that I would consider undergoing a background check if it means I can walk around the security checkpoint, holding my belongings.

Other than that, you're right -- what is the point?

Why do people sign up for it? Because they're stupid, and unfortunately, stupidity is a common illness these days.
JS is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.