are ice skates considered to be a weapon?
#1
Original Poster




Join Date: May 2005
Location: Mid-Atlantic
Posts: 5,024
are ice skates considered to be a weapon?
My son would like to take his hockey skates with us on an upcoming trip. These skates have about an 11 inch long rather sharp blade on them. To me, they're sporting equipment; will the TSA see them as weapons?
We'd rather not put them in checked luggage because they were a rather expensive custom order, and my son has them nicely broken in now, so would be extremely upset to have them stolen by the luggage gremlins.
We'd rather not put them in checked luggage because they were a rather expensive custom order, and my son has them nicely broken in now, so would be extremely upset to have them stolen by the luggage gremlins.
#2




Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: NYC
Programs: DL PM, Marriott Gold, Hertz PC, National Exec
Posts: 6,736
My son would like to take his hockey skates with us on an upcoming trip. These skates have about an 11 inch long rather sharp blade on them. To me, they're sporting equipment; will the TSA see them as weapons?
We'd rather not put them in checked luggage because they were a rather expensive custom order, and my son has them nicely broken in now, so would be extremely upset to have them stolen by the luggage gremlins.
We'd rather not put them in checked luggage because they were a rather expensive custom order, and my son has them nicely broken in now, so would be extremely upset to have them stolen by the luggage gremlins.
http://www.tsa.gov/traveler-informat...ohibited-items
You might, of course, get the "rules changed, website is out of date, yadda yadda" claim from the TSA, but they should be entirely fine.
#5
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend




Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: where the chile is hot
Programs: AA,RR,NW,Delta ,UA,CO
Posts: 49,067
#6
Join Date: May 2004
Programs: BA blue, LH Senator, KQ (FB) gold
Posts: 8,214
I've always found it rather perverse that they would ban items like hockey skates but continue to allow wine bottles, either by the crew or via duty free, which could serve as both a cosh and a cutting instrument.
Again, despite the fact that the skates were expensive, skates really aren't the target of thieves. They want things that are easily sellable - electronics and jewelry - or of course, cash! The real risk is not that they will be stolen, but that they will be lost. Taking into account both the cost of the skates and the cost (in time and blisters) of breaking in new ones, you definitely want to carry them on.
#7




Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: NYC
Programs: DL PM, Marriott Gold, Hertz PC, National Exec
Posts: 6,736
#8
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend




Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: where the chile is hot
Programs: AA,RR,NW,Delta ,UA,CO
Posts: 49,067
The FAs objected to tiny knives, but the knives were only one of several items. Ski/trekking poles were going to be permitted. TSA could still have relaxed (normalized) the rules on the other items, but instead, the entire list was rescinded.
#10
Original Poster




Join Date: May 2005
Location: Mid-Atlantic
Posts: 5,024
... or the kid on the opposing team who needed 10 stitches in his arm after a collision with one of his own teammates.
There's a reason that metal thing on the bottom of the skate is called a blade. It would be far easier to slit a throat with a skate than with my pocket knife.
There's a reason that metal thing on the bottom of the skate is called a blade. It would be far easier to slit a throat with a skate than with my pocket knife.
#11
Join Date: May 2004
Programs: BA blue, LH Senator, KQ (FB) gold
Posts: 8,214
... or the kid on the opposing team who needed 10 stitches in his arm after a collision with one of his own teammates.
There's a reason that metal thing on the bottom of the skate is called a blade. It would be far easier to slit a throat with a skate than with my pocket knife.
There's a reason that metal thing on the bottom of the skate is called a blade. It would be far easier to slit a throat with a skate than with my pocket knife.
#13
Join Date: May 2004
Programs: BA blue, LH Senator, KQ (FB) gold
Posts: 8,214
#14
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend




Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: where the chile is hot
Programs: AA,RR,NW,Delta ,UA,CO
Posts: 49,067
I'm not suggesting skates should be banned, only that IMHO, they're easily capable of causing much more damage than the small knives that the FAs were worried about.
No one is going to take command of a plane with either one, but there is more potential for damage from the skate blades.
OT, but in an antique/junk shop a few years ago, I saw an older pair of skates with removable blades. The idea was that you could walk around in the skate boots just like regular shoes. When you were ready to skate, the blades attached under the boot. I wish now I'd paid more attention to the mechanism, but it worked very much like cycling SPDs. Pretty cool, actually.
#15
Join Date: May 2004
Programs: BA blue, LH Senator, KQ (FB) gold
Posts: 8,214
If someone had nefarious intent, it would be much easier to tinker with a pair of skates to make it easy to remove the blades than it would be to turn a very small knife blade into a serious weapon.
I'm not suggesting skates should be banned, only that IMHO, they're easily capable of causing much more damage than the small knives that the FAs were worried about.
No one is going to take command of a plane with either one, but there is more potential for damage from the skate blades.
I'm not suggesting skates should be banned, only that IMHO, they're easily capable of causing much more damage than the small knives that the FAs were worried about.
No one is going to take command of a plane with either one, but there is more potential for damage from the skate blades.
To my mind, it is irrelevant whether one is marginally more dangerous than the other (I could certainly craft an argument for the reverse) because neither of them are a real threat to aircraft security.



