Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Travel&Dining > Travel Safety/Security > Practical Travel Safety and Security Issues
Reload this Page >

Transit Facilities Pilot Program at ANC for CX Through Passengers

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Transit Facilities Pilot Program at ANC for CX Through Passengers

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 15, 2013 | 10:25 am
  #1  
Original Poster
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
25 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Posts: 3,959
Transit Facilities Pilot Program at ANC for CX Through Passengers

Stumbled across this on Timatic:

USA (US)

TWOV (Transit Without Visa):
- If flying Cathay Pacific (CX) between Hong Kong and Toronto,
via Anchorage, Alaska:
A Transit Passenger Inspection Pilot Program (TPIPP) has

been introduced for passengers travelling between Hong Kong
and Toronto, Canada that operate via Anchorage, Alaska. This
does not reinstate the TWOV or ITI program and currently,

only Cathay Pacific (CX) is a signatory to an In-Transit
Lounge Agreement at Anchorage.
TPIPP passengers are not permitted outside of the sterile,
Federal Inspection Service (FIS)/CBP area.

The In-Transit Lounge agreement between the CBP and Cathay
Pacific applies to alien passengers who are seeking to pass
through the USA in an immediate and continuous transit,

without a stopover and whose scheduled travel includes a
single stop within the USA at Anchorage International

Airport (ANC), due to the flight routing. Transfer of

passengers to another aircraft is not permitted.
However, the TPIPP program is not available to nationals of

Cuba, Iran, Korea (Dem. People's Rep.), Sudan and Syria.
The carrier must provide 100% Advance Passenger Information

(API) in advance of the aircraft's arrival at Anchorage for
all TPIPP passengers. If less than 100% information is

provided, those TPIPP passengers for whom information is

insufficient or unacceptable, must be presented to the CBP
for full CBP processing, which may also include an
inspection of their baggage.
BigFlyer is offline  
Old Sep 15, 2013 | 7:03 pm
  #2  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
30 Countries Visited
3M
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: NYC, USA
Programs: AA EXP 3MM, Lifetime Platinum, Marriott Titanium, HH Gold
Posts: 11,049
How interesting. I suspect that DHS/CBP and the local airport authority at ANC were willing to accommodate CX with this kind of TWOV-style arrangement for two reasons:

1) ANC has nowhere near the international flight volume as continental US hubs like MIA, ORD, DFW, JFK, etc.

2) The CX flight continues on the same aircraft. So it's just a question of moving the pax off and then back onto the same bird. No connections, no gate changes.

3) CX probably was willing to offer some kind of consideration to DHS/CBP.

4) It might save DHS some money on staffing, especially if the CX flight arrives at an irregular time when there is not full staffing in the FIS area.


I would LOVE to see MIA and DFW offer this kind of arrangement for pax transiting from Central/South Am to Canada and even Europe. But I don't see it happening anytime soon because MIA and DFW are huge hubs and virtually EVERY connection involves a change of aircraft. It would be too logistically difficult to deliver TWOV pax to the correct connecting aircraft within the sterile international arrivals area (where gates are not even signed). And too much risk that these pax might come into contact with pax or goods inside the USA during the transit.

Also a big problem if there were IRROPS that required aircraft to be deplaned...those pax could be deplaned into the concourse by mistake and then walk out the door and be illegally inside the USA. Or they could pass items illegally to others (domestic-origin pax) who then could deplane.
ESpen36 is offline  
Old Sep 15, 2013 | 7:33 pm
  #3  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: ICN / 평택
Programs: AA, DL Gold, UA Gold, HHonors Gold
Posts: 8,713
Originally Posted by ESpen36
I would LOVE to see MIA and DFW offer this kind of arrangement for pax transiting from Central/South Am to Canada and even Europe. But I don't see it happening anytime soon because MIA and DFW are huge hubs and virtually EVERY connection involves a change of aircraft. It would be too logistically difficult to deliver TWOV pax to the correct connecting aircraft within the sterile international arrivals area (where gates are not even signed). And too much risk that these pax might come into contact with pax or goods inside the USA during the transit.
It would make sense for several US hub airports, including LAX and ATL to offer a purely international terminal. All over Europe it is done with no trouble whatsoever; just a few security modifications to the existing airport terminals. It would be fairly simple in Atlanta to sequester concourse E into a strictly international terminal. Once you get in, no one goes back landside without clearing CBP.
etch5895 is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.