Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Electronic cigarette on bus terror alert

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 5, 2012 | 2:23 pm
  #1  
Original Poster
FlyerTalk Evangelist
10 Countries Visited
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: NRT
Programs: Tokyo Monorail Diamond-Encrusted-Platinum
Posts: 10,047
Electronic cigarette on bus terror alert

Police shut down a stretch of the M6 motorway when someone on a Megabus got panicked by some smoke and reported strange goings on - smoke and liquids.

The horror. The horror!

"Given the nature of the report we responded swiftly and proportionately, treating the information as credible and extremely seriously. Our utmost priority was the safety and security of those people on the coach and those travelling on the motorway."

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2012...?newsfeed=true
jib71 is offline  
Old Jul 9, 2012 | 9:06 am
  #2  
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 84
RUDE COMMENT DELETED BY MODERATOR

if you ever have been on a moving bus before or had any imagination whatsoever, it is not unconscionable to think that a passenger could be acting suspiciously, maybe even belligerant if asked to stop. Those busses are often double deckers. The ventilation is such that air would recirculate within the cabin, not pass freely through any vents. if they were all subjected to unexplained strange smokes and smells, darn right there would be a lot of emergency calls! especially in a country where the public transportation system had already been successfully targeted before.

"smoking aids" my foot! If a passenger had a legal medically prescribed aid, the driver should know about it, and sequestered the rider so as not to put any other passengers in inconvenience, nor in harm's way. Those medical devices have noxious fumes and if someone absolutely needs that kind of attention, let them rent a private coach or taxi and not succumb the rest of us to smoke and terrible smells - especially as it was done in a manner to obviously try to circumvent the passenger etiquette rules, the passenger probably looked like he had devious intentions or no regard for society.

Last edited by squeakr; Jul 9, 2012 at 11:59 am Reason: rudeness
launcher is offline  
Old Jul 9, 2012 | 10:33 am
  #3  
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: LCY
Posts: 1,224
Originally Posted by launcher
QUOTE OF RUDE COMMENT DELETED BY MODERATOR
if you ever have been on a moving bus before or had any imagination whatsoever, it is not unconscionable to think that a passenger could be acting suspiciously, maybe even belligerant if asked to stop. Those busses are often double deckers. The ventilation is such that air would recirculate within the cabin, not pass freely through any vents. if they were all subjected to unexplained strange smokes and smells, darn right there would be a lot of emergency calls! especially in a country where the public transportation system had already been successfully targeted before.

"smoking aids" my foot! If a passenger had a legal medically prescribed aid, the driver should know about it, and sequestered the rider so as not to put any other passengers in inconvenience, nor in harm's way. Those medical devices have noxious fumes and if someone absolutely needs that kind of attention, let them rent a private coach or taxi and not succumb the rest of us to smoke and terrible smells - especially as it was done in a manner to obviously try to circumvent the passenger etiquette rules, the passenger probably looked like he had devious intentions or no regard for society.
RUDE COMMENT DELETED BY MODERATOR

As the story points out the bus was not a double-decker, basic electronic stop-smoking aids that do not emit "noxious fumes" are available over the counter in Britain and many other countries, and the security services response (closing a major freeway for seven hours, deploying dozens of army, police and paramedic units including hazmat decontamination tents, and removing passengers one by one at the point of a gun and then making them squat on the tarmac) - all because someone called the police on a brown passenger with a small wisp of smoke - appeared excessive.

Last edited by squeakr; Jul 9, 2012 at 11:59 am Reason: rude
stewardo is offline  
Old Jul 9, 2012 | 12:00 pm
  #4  
Moderator: Hilton Honors, Practical Travel Safety Issues, Information Desk & San Francisco
10 Countries Visited
All eyes on you!
25 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: San Francisco CA
Programs: UA, Hilton, Priceline, AirBnB
Posts: 11,319
Please stop the name calling

thanks.

squeakr

co MOD TS/S
squeakr is offline  
Old Jul 10, 2012 | 2:39 pm
  #5  
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: New Zealand/ UK
Programs: NZ, EK, QF, SQ.
Posts: 776
Electronic cigarettes do not emit noxious vapours. They emit water vapour, which can look like smoke. The vapour they emit has a slight smell, that is only discernible at very close range. I know, because my husband uses them.

E-cigs are freely available in the UK and they can also be bought on line. There is no need for anyone to be notified that a person is using them.
celle is offline  
Old Sep 27, 2012 | 4:50 am
  #6  
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Germany
Posts: 1
Hi! Once I was listening to the news and I came to know that after receiving an emergency call describing vapor coming from the luggage of a man traveling on a cross-country passenger bus, a reported 25 police cars, 13 fire engines, 4 ambulances and 2 army bomb disposal teams were sent to intercept the London-bound vehicle. And the cause of the drama? An electronic cigarette.
aleezay is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.