Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Travel&Dining > Travel Safety/Security > Practical Travel Safety and Security Issues
Reload this Page >

Risked Based Security for pax aged 12 and under

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Risked Based Security for pax aged 12 and under

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 15, 2011 | 3:17 pm
  #46  
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Nashville, TN
Programs: WN Nothing and spending the half million points from too many flights, Hilton Diamond
Posts: 8,043
Sounds like a move in the right direction.

I agree with the concept of RBS, but my concern is implementation on the scale required by TSA.

As to the confusion on shoes on/off there is a simple solution, maybe our resident TSA folks can agree and pass it on. The TDC, already making the 18 or older call, could simply tell parents at the podium the children that are exempt from shoe removal. This would be long before they would even have to think about getting them off.
InkUnderNails is offline  
Old Aug 15, 2011 | 3:25 pm
  #47  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
10 Countries Visited
Community Builder
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: where the chile is hot
Programs: AA,RR,NW,Delta ,UA,CO
Posts: 49,098
Originally Posted by SATTSO
So when someone tells me they don't want "to feel like felons every time [they] walked through the airport", I have to wonder, under what type of security screening are they talking about? The old way with WTMD/HHMD or the new way with AIT/SPD?
I have only alarmed WTMD twice in my life. Resolved the first time by removing things, second time with a wand.

Since last fall, I've been randomly selected for NoS 90+% of the time. Meaning I've been groped 90+% of the times I pass through the checkpoint.

What's changed? I can't assume and hold the position in the NoS.

I realize there's no data, but I do not recall as many people taking road trips in the past - road trips specifically to avoid airport hassle.
chollie is offline  
Old Aug 15, 2011 | 3:27 pm
  #48  
10 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: CMH
Programs: Delta Gold Medallion, United
Posts: 433
Originally Posted by SATTSO
Some of you may agree, some of you may not, but at one airport right now a new RBS procedure is being test concerning children 12 yrs and younger. Citing a few new procedures, children 12 and under will not be required to remove their shoes unless they alarm the WTMD, nor will they be screened by AIT unless the parent ask.
...
Bicker away!
No bickering here, but I do have a question. The announcement at tsa.gov does not seem to state that children will not be screened by WBI.

Here's what it says regarding WBI:

Q. Will TSA still conduct pat-downs on children?
A. As part of this pilot, Transportation Security Officers will have more options to resolve alarms when screening passengers 12 and under. These may include permitting multiple attempts to capture a clear image during advanced imaging technology screening or greater use of explosives trace detection. These changes in protocol will ultimately reduce though not eliminate pat-downs of children.

...

Q. Will children still go through Advanced Imaging Technology?
A. Advanced Imaging Technology remains optional for all passengers. As part of this screening change, TSA will permit multiple attempts by passengers 12 and under to capture a clear image during advanced imaging technology screening to further reduce the need for pat-downs to resolve any alarms.
I guess I don't see where children will not have to go through WBI. It sounds like the same opt-out option we are supposed to have.

Is this just an incomplete announcement? Am I reading something incorrectly? Is it simply not being announced directly due to security concerns? I guess I was expecting the government to be all over the "We won't irradiate your kids unless you ask!" aspect, if it's true.
NotaCriminal is offline  
Old Aug 15, 2011 | 3:28 pm
  #49  
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Houston
Programs: CO Platinum
Posts: 283
Originally Posted by SATTSO
Some of you may agree, some of you may not, but at one airport right now a new RBS procedure is being test concerning children 12 yrs and younger. Citing a few new procedures, children 12 and under will not be required to remove their shoes unless they alarm the WTMD, nor will they be screened by AIT unless the parent ask.

If this pilot program is successful, it will go national. Some of you may complain about this, but I think in general the public will like it. As noted in this article, which I am sure will be dismissed here, this is a step in the right direction.

http://articles.orlandosentinel.com/...a-common-sense

Bicker away!

According to the TSA website (http://www.tsa.gov/what_we_do/screening_under12.shtm):

Q. Will children still go through Advanced Imaging Technology?
A. Advanced Imaging Technology remains optional for all passengers. As part of this screening change, TSA will permit multiple attempts by passengers 12 and under to capture a clear image during advanced imaging technology screening to further reduce the need for pat-downs to resolve any alarms.



This sure doesn't sound as if AIT for children is going away any time soon. Maybe SATTSO should read his own website.
mulieri is offline  
Old Aug 15, 2011 | 3:32 pm
  #50  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,145
There are some really horrendous lines of communication over there at TSA.
TheGolfWidow is offline  
Old Aug 15, 2011 | 3:32 pm
  #51  
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 2,425
Originally Posted by SATTSO
but...but...but... thats the only reason I work for TSA
You and Bart need to hook up...
nachtnebel is offline  
Old Aug 15, 2011 | 3:44 pm
  #52  
Suspended
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 4,953
Originally Posted by studentff


This will be interesting. TSA history would suggest that RBS would mean the current level of screening for everyone and more screening for those deemed risky. E.g., if the BDO doesn't like your answers, micro-expressions, or non-answers, you get sent for a full secondary. But this MCO policy may signal an inflection point toward using RBS to reduce screening, and it's becoming clear that TSA is worried about the bad PR it gets from overzealous screening.
FYI, Congressman Benny Thompson has recently requested that Pistole
cease implementation of the SPOT program and redeploy BDOs
to other jobs.

http://chsdemocrats.house.gov/SiteDo...1527-35715.pdf
doober is offline  
Old Aug 15, 2011 | 4:26 pm
  #53  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,145
Originally Posted by doober
FYI, Congressman Benny Thompson has recently requested that Pistole to other jobs.

cease implementation of the SPOT program and redeploy BDOs
http://chsdemocrats.house.gov/SiteDo...1527-35715.pdf
Oooh, lookie! Another letter from a United States Congressman to ignore!!
TheGolfWidow is offline  
Old Aug 15, 2011 | 4:29 pm
  #54  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 3,702
Originally Posted by Boggie Dog
Question for SATTSO and GSOLTSO. Did TSA send you guys out to talk about this pilot program? Timing is sure interesting.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u70EYe4vy8U
SATTSO is offline  
Old Aug 15, 2011 | 4:31 pm
  #55  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 3,702
Originally Posted by mulieri


This sure doesn't sound as if AIT for children is going away any time soon. Maybe SATTSO should read his own website.
I have read the web-site.
SATTSO is offline  
Old Aug 15, 2011 | 4:38 pm
  #56  
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Houston
Programs: CO Platinum
Posts: 283
Originally Posted by SATTSO
I have read the web-site.
Pehaps you can assist me with my reading comprehension then. You indicated that AIT would only be used for children under 12 at the request of parents. If that is the case, why would this not be included on the TSA website? Instead, there is a answer that AIT can be repeated instead of perhaps initiating a pat-down at first point of "failure" whatever that is.

What you are saying and the what the website is saying, while not explicitly contradictory, does not seem to be consistent.
mulieri is offline  
Old Aug 15, 2011 | 4:50 pm
  #57  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 3,702
Originally Posted by mulieri
Pehaps you can assist me with my reading comprehension then. You indicated that AIT would only be used for children under 12 at the request of parents. If that is the case, why would this not be included on the TSA website? Instead, there is a answer that AIT can be repeated instead of perhaps initiating a pat-down at first point of "failure" whatever that is.

What you are saying and the what the website is saying, while not explicitly contradictory, does not seem to be consistent.
I do not write the TSA web-site, so I can not answer you. I can tell you that there are many parts to RBS, and not all of them are being test at all airports. If you note on the link it also list DEN as a place where children can leave their shoes on, yet I know nothing nor heard nothing about that airport regarding children and AIT.

In another thread (which I think is closed or move) someone accused Pistole of lying, noting video of a child being patted down. The implication was that Pistole said children would not be patted down. Well, that is not true. Pistole has said that more efforts will be made to clear children before a pat down is conducted. This policy on the web-site confirms that, and that is all.

There are other components of RBS that are not list on this site, but that does not mean they are, lets say, in the works. To claim that if such policy is not list on the web-site, therefor, it does not exist, is faulty logic.

ADD: I will also point out, as noticed by many FT members, the TSA web-site has sometimes not been the most accurate, as when ice was allowed through the checkpoint, but not noted on the site, for just one example.
SATTSO is offline  
Old Aug 15, 2011 | 4:54 pm
  #58  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
10 Countries Visited
Community Builder
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: where the chile is hot
Programs: AA,RR,NW,Delta ,UA,CO
Posts: 49,098
This makes it sound like multiple passes through the AIT will be allowed for kids.

I thought multiple passes weren't allowed. So now they might be, but only for kids, as a last resort?
chollie is offline  
Old Aug 15, 2011 | 4:56 pm
  #59  
1M
40 Countries Visited
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: on the path to perdition
Programs: Delta, United
Posts: 5,017
I will reserve my full judgement but

Q. How will TSA know which passengers are under 12?
A. TSA Officers will make a judgment based how old the child appears.

but given the judgement of some TSOs the above will be an issue. Further, the age limit should be at least 16 if not 18.
FlyingUnderTheRadar is offline  
Old Aug 15, 2011 | 5:03 pm
  #60  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
10 Countries Visited
Community Builder
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: where the chile is hot
Programs: AA,RR,NW,Delta ,UA,CO
Posts: 49,098
Originally Posted by FlyingUnderTheRadar
I will reserve my full judgement but

Q. How will TSA know which passengers are under 12?
A. TSA Officers will make a judgment based how old the child appears.

but given the judgement of some TSOs the above will be an issue. Further, the age limit should be at least 16 if not 18.
Well...there's no current requirement, of course, but if a child 12 or under thinks there's the slightest chance he/she might be mistaken for older, all he/she has to do is....get a valid government picture ID to prove his/her age.
chollie is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.