Risked Based Security for pax aged 12 and under
#46
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Nashville, TN
Programs: WN Nothing and spending the half million points from too many flights, Hilton Diamond
Posts: 8,043
Sounds like a move in the right direction.
I agree with the concept of RBS, but my concern is implementation on the scale required by TSA.
As to the confusion on shoes on/off there is a simple solution, maybe our resident TSA folks can agree and pass it on. The TDC, already making the 18 or older call, could simply tell parents at the podium the children that are exempt from shoe removal. This would be long before they would even have to think about getting them off.
I agree with the concept of RBS, but my concern is implementation on the scale required by TSA.
As to the confusion on shoes on/off there is a simple solution, maybe our resident TSA folks can agree and pass it on. The TDC, already making the 18 or older call, could simply tell parents at the podium the children that are exempt from shoe removal. This would be long before they would even have to think about getting them off.
#47
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend




Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: where the chile is hot
Programs: AA,RR,NW,Delta ,UA,CO
Posts: 49,098
Since last fall, I've been randomly selected for NoS 90+% of the time. Meaning I've been groped 90+% of the times I pass through the checkpoint.
What's changed? I can't assume and hold the position in the NoS.
I realize there's no data, but I do not recall as many people taking road trips in the past - road trips specifically to avoid airport hassle.
#48

Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: CMH
Programs: Delta Gold Medallion, United
Posts: 433
Some of you may agree, some of you may not, but at one airport right now a new RBS procedure is being test concerning children 12 yrs and younger. Citing a few new procedures, children 12 and under will not be required to remove their shoes unless they alarm the WTMD, nor will they be screened by AIT unless the parent ask.
...
Bicker away!
...
Bicker away!
Here's what it says regarding WBI:
Q. Will TSA still conduct pat-downs on children?
A. As part of this pilot, Transportation Security Officers will have more options to resolve alarms when screening passengers 12 and under. These may include permitting multiple attempts to capture a clear image during advanced imaging technology screening or greater use of explosives trace detection. These changes in protocol will ultimately reduce though not eliminate pat-downs of children.
...
Q. Will children still go through Advanced Imaging Technology?
A. Advanced Imaging Technology remains optional for all passengers. As part of this screening change, TSA will permit multiple attempts by passengers 12 and under to capture a clear image during advanced imaging technology screening to further reduce the need for pat-downs to resolve any alarms.
A. As part of this pilot, Transportation Security Officers will have more options to resolve alarms when screening passengers 12 and under. These may include permitting multiple attempts to capture a clear image during advanced imaging technology screening or greater use of explosives trace detection. These changes in protocol will ultimately reduce though not eliminate pat-downs of children.
...
Q. Will children still go through Advanced Imaging Technology?
A. Advanced Imaging Technology remains optional for all passengers. As part of this screening change, TSA will permit multiple attempts by passengers 12 and under to capture a clear image during advanced imaging technology screening to further reduce the need for pat-downs to resolve any alarms.
Is this just an incomplete announcement? Am I reading something incorrectly? Is it simply not being announced directly due to security concerns? I guess I was expecting the government to be all over the "We won't irradiate your kids unless you ask!" aspect, if it's true.
#49
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Houston
Programs: CO Platinum
Posts: 283
Some of you may agree, some of you may not, but at one airport right now a new RBS procedure is being test concerning children 12 yrs and younger. Citing a few new procedures, children 12 and under will not be required to remove their shoes unless they alarm the WTMD, nor will they be screened by AIT unless the parent ask.
If this pilot program is successful, it will go national. Some of you may complain about this, but I think in general the public will like it. As noted in this article, which I am sure will be dismissed here, this is a step in the right direction.
http://articles.orlandosentinel.com/...a-common-sense
Bicker away!
If this pilot program is successful, it will go national. Some of you may complain about this, but I think in general the public will like it. As noted in this article, which I am sure will be dismissed here, this is a step in the right direction.
http://articles.orlandosentinel.com/...a-common-sense
Bicker away!
According to the TSA website (http://www.tsa.gov/what_we_do/screening_under12.shtm):
Q. Will children still go through Advanced Imaging Technology?
A. Advanced Imaging Technology remains optional for all passengers. As part of this screening change, TSA will permit multiple attempts by passengers 12 and under to capture a clear image during advanced imaging technology screening to further reduce the need for pat-downs to resolve any alarms.
This sure doesn't sound as if AIT for children is going away any time soon. Maybe SATTSO should read his own website.
#52
Suspended
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 4,953
This will be interesting. TSA history would suggest that RBS would mean the current level of screening for everyone and more screening for those deemed risky. E.g., if the BDO doesn't like your answers, micro-expressions, or non-answers, you get sent for a full secondary. But this MCO policy may signal an inflection point toward using RBS to reduce screening, and it's becoming clear that TSA is worried about the bad PR it gets from overzealous screening.
cease implementation of the SPOT program and redeploy BDOs
http://chsdemocrats.house.gov/SiteDo...1527-35715.pdf
#53
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,145
FYI, Congressman Benny Thompson has recently requested that Pistole to other jobs.
http://chsdemocrats.house.gov/SiteDo...1527-35715.pdf
cease implementation of the SPOT program and redeploy BDOs
#54
Original Poster
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 3,702
#56
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Houston
Programs: CO Platinum
Posts: 283
Pehaps you can assist me with my reading comprehension then. You indicated that AIT would only be used for children under 12 at the request of parents. If that is the case, why would this not be included on the TSA website? Instead, there is a answer that AIT can be repeated instead of perhaps initiating a pat-down at first point of "failure" whatever that is.
What you are saying and the what the website is saying, while not explicitly contradictory, does not seem to be consistent.
What you are saying and the what the website is saying, while not explicitly contradictory, does not seem to be consistent.
#57
Original Poster
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 3,702
Pehaps you can assist me with my reading comprehension then. You indicated that AIT would only be used for children under 12 at the request of parents. If that is the case, why would this not be included on the TSA website? Instead, there is a answer that AIT can be repeated instead of perhaps initiating a pat-down at first point of "failure" whatever that is.
What you are saying and the what the website is saying, while not explicitly contradictory, does not seem to be consistent.
What you are saying and the what the website is saying, while not explicitly contradictory, does not seem to be consistent.
In another thread (which I think is closed or move) someone accused Pistole of lying, noting video of a child being patted down. The implication was that Pistole said children would not be patted down. Well, that is not true. Pistole has said that more efforts will be made to clear children before a pat down is conducted. This policy on the web-site confirms that, and that is all.
There are other components of RBS that are not list on this site, but that does not mean they are, lets say, in the works. To claim that if such policy is not list on the web-site, therefor, it does not exist, is faulty logic.
ADD: I will also point out, as noticed by many FT members, the TSA web-site has sometimes not been the most accurate, as when ice was allowed through the checkpoint, but not noted on the site, for just one example.
#58
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend




Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: where the chile is hot
Programs: AA,RR,NW,Delta ,UA,CO
Posts: 49,098
This makes it sound like multiple passes through the AIT will be allowed for kids.
I thought multiple passes weren't allowed. So now they might be, but only for kids, as a last resort?
I thought multiple passes weren't allowed. So now they might be, but only for kids, as a last resort?
#59




Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: on the path to perdition
Programs: Delta, United
Posts: 5,017
I will reserve my full judgement but
Q. How will TSA know which passengers are under 12?
A. TSA Officers will make a judgment based how old the child appears.
but given the judgement of some TSOs the above will be an issue. Further, the age limit should be at least 16 if not 18.
Q. How will TSA know which passengers are under 12?
A. TSA Officers will make a judgment based how old the child appears.
but given the judgement of some TSOs the above will be an issue. Further, the age limit should be at least 16 if not 18.
#60
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend




Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: where the chile is hot
Programs: AA,RR,NW,Delta ,UA,CO
Posts: 49,098
I will reserve my full judgement but
Q. How will TSA know which passengers are under 12?
A. TSA Officers will make a judgment based how old the child appears.
but given the judgement of some TSOs the above will be an issue. Further, the age limit should be at least 16 if not 18.
Q. How will TSA know which passengers are under 12?
A. TSA Officers will make a judgment based how old the child appears.
but given the judgement of some TSOs the above will be an issue. Further, the age limit should be at least 16 if not 18.



You and Bart need to hook up...