Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Grounds for Interrogration before TDC?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 18, 2010 | 10:20 pm
  #31  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Newport Beach, California, USA
Posts: 36,062
Originally Posted by ND Sol
I don't disagree; although after the BDO asked me if I had ID, to which I responded yes, and then asked to see it, to which I responded no, that was probably the straw that broke the camel's back leading to two BDO's tailing me, a subsequent detention by LEO's for 90 minutes and confiscation of my property for over 24 hours (and this was all landside).
I'd like to hear more about this. Did you post about it? If not, would you? Thanks.
PTravel is offline  
Old Dec 18, 2010 | 10:24 pm
  #32  
Original Poster
FlyerTalk Evangelist
30 Countries Visited
1M
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Northeast Kansas | Colorado Native
Programs: Amex Gold/Plat, UA *G, Hyatt Globalist, IHG Plat Marriott LT Gold, NEXUS, TSA Disparager Unobtanium
Posts: 22,651
Originally Posted by PTravel
I'd like to hear more about this. Did you post about it? If not, would you? Thanks.
This is the thread detailing the incident:

http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/trave...ographing.html
FriendlySkies is offline  
Old Dec 18, 2010 | 10:28 pm
  #33  
Original Member
10 Countries Visited
100k
Community Influencer
25 Years on Site
 
Join Date: May 1998
Location: PDX
Programs: TSA Refusenik charter member
Posts: 16,127
Originally Posted by FriendlySkies
Originally Posted by PTravel
I'd like to hear more about this. Did you post about it? If not, would you? Thanks.
This is the thread detailing the incident:

http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/trave...ographing.html
Epic thread. ^
essxjay is offline  
Old Dec 18, 2010 | 10:31 pm
  #34  
Original Poster
FlyerTalk Evangelist
30 Countries Visited
1M
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Northeast Kansas | Colorado Native
Programs: Amex Gold/Plat, UA *G, Hyatt Globalist, IHG Plat Marriott LT Gold, NEXUS, TSA Disparager Unobtanium
Posts: 22,651
Originally Posted by PTravel
I'd like to hear more about this. Did you post about it? If not, would you? Thanks.
Originally Posted by FriendlySkies
This is the thread detailing the incident:

http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/trave...ographing.html
Originally Posted by essxjay
Epic thread. ^

+1

I just reread the entire report, and it's amazing what this country has turned into
FriendlySkies is offline  
Old Dec 19, 2010 | 6:57 am
  #35  
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 66
I am returning the the Mother Ship (Israel) for a while, and I am connecting through Central and West Africa for business. If I said this at Ben Gurion, security guy wouldn't really care: he's observing how I act, not so much what I say. However, if they ever try to give me a hard time, I'll just start talking about Rambam and watch his eyes glaze over LOL

If I say this to a smurf at US airport, they think perhaps they can "bust" me. You see all the arrests TSA seeks to justify its existence, no?

The problem is, the TSA can't be trusted -- at all. In the US, you NEVER share info with police -- ever. Police and agents of gov are NEVER there to help you... it's just SOP. I have some American family in police, and trust me, they don't care!!!

I applaud the TSA for TRYING this method, but they need to:
1) establish that the info can't be used for criminal .... -- at all!
2) hire israelis: tons of israelis would LOVE this job. Getting paid to hassle Americans... I think that's called heaven
3) Accept the fact they'll have to pay more than 45k/yr to get someone reasonably capable for this job... that's the hard-bit.

Terrorism is a real threat, and I am sure there are guys frustrated with just stabbing American tourists in Jerusalem and want to take out a whole PLANE of us... I am beginning to think the TSA will figure it out, but it'll be painful process.

Till then, I fly in/out Canada

Originally Posted by Ari
It only happened to me once; I had time to spare, so I had fun with it. He came up with his partner nearby but pretending not to listen. He asked me how I was and I said "fine". Then he asked me for my BP and I gave it to him. He asked why I was going to Chicago. I got fed up and replied: "See spot; see spot run; go spot; go spot go . . . bother another passenger". The look was priceless. I was given SSSS treatment and filed a complaint.
THAT'S EXACTLY THE PROBLEM with the Americans doing this: when someone gets INDIGNANT, TRULY INDIGNANT, it PROVES they're innocent.

El Al didn't want my fiance to take her computer once with her on a trip (this was a while ago -- forgot why). She told them, "I'm not flying without my lap-top." They let her go w/o a hassle. Another time, she got asked about some Jewish stuff, and she lost her temper and told them to get stuffed.

Again, they let her go on her way, straight-away.

In both cases, the TSA wouldn't budge, and they'd react as a stupid bureaucracy, rather than an intellgience(LOL!) agency of sorts.

Last edited by Kiwi Flyer; Dec 24, 2010 at 2:53 pm Reason: merge consecutive posts
zefatcheese is offline  
Old Dec 19, 2010 | 7:17 am
  #36  
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Salish Sea
Programs: DL,AC,HH,PC
Posts: 8,972
Originally Posted by Global_Hi_Flyer
That the dogs will scare a terrorist into leaving?
And that would be a bad thing because.... ?

Note to Pistole: You're not a cop anymore, the primary purpose of the TSA is not to catch terrorists. Or criminals or deadbeat dads or underage college kids etc., etc.
Wally Bird is offline  
Old Dec 19, 2010 | 7:33 am
  #37  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
20 Countries Visited
1M
40 Nights
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Marriott or Hilton hot tub with a big drink <glub> Beverage: To-Go Bag DYKWIA:SSSS /rolleyes ☈ Date Night:Costco
Programs: Sea Shell Lounge Platinum, TSA Pre✓ Refusnik Diamond, PWP Gold, FT subset of the subset
Posts: 12,523
Here's some suggestions for responding to behavior detection screeners.

Another idea is to ignore their questions and respond with a sales pitch for pre-need funeral insurance or a great business opportunity called Amway.
N965VJ is offline  
Old Dec 19, 2010 | 7:46 am
  #38  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,145
Originally Posted by N965VJ
Here's some suggestions for responding to behavior detection screeners.

Another idea is to ignore their questions and respond with a sales pitch for pre-need funeral insurance or a great business opportunity called Amway.
My response to strangers who probe me on a personal level is "I'm sorry, do we know one another?" Not that I'm sorry, and not that I care if we know one another -- it's just more polite than "Get lost."
TheGolfWidow is offline  
Old Dec 19, 2010 | 7:59 am
  #39  
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 364
Originally Posted by TheGolfWidow
My response to strangers who probe me on a personal level is "I'm sorry, do we know one another?" Not that I'm sorry, and not that I care if we know one another -- it's just more polite than "Get lost."
That is good advice. I never talk to strangers. Never know their motives.
Another thing to do is have your MP3 player earphones in, and just ignore anyone talking to you. To add to the effect, be lip syncing the song and slightly dancing while standing in line.

If they touch you in any way, could assault charges be brought against them?
Pluma is offline  
Old Dec 19, 2010 | 8:30 am
  #40  
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: RDU
Programs: OnePass
Posts: 772
Originally Posted by N965VJ
Here's some suggestions for responding to behavior detection screeners.

Another idea is to ignore their questions and respond with a sales pitch for pre-need funeral insurance or a great business opportunity called Amway.
"Are you ready to accept Jesus Christ as your personal saviour?"

That might get them to run...I know I head for the hills when I hear it.
mikemey is offline  
Old Dec 19, 2010 | 8:33 am
  #41  
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
2M
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: BOS
Programs: riding the lifetime status. DL MM / AA MM / vino volo reserve
Posts: 2,973
Originally Posted by FetePerfection
Here's my take on TSA interrogation of pax - it's what a lot of us on FT have suggested is needed, Israeli-style security tactics, interviews, bomb sniffing dogs & profiling. Unfortunately I don't think our current TSA are qualified or trained in effective interrogation, but I think it's a step in the right direction. Frankly I would rather answer their questions than submit to NoS or molestation.
+1. got the chatty TSO working the line this morning while waiting for a checkpoint where NoS was roped off. all in all, that's a good morning. i think they should be using this tactic, and in the event congress / courts manage to relegate NoS to secondary use only, i would expect to see a lot more of it.
Seat1A is offline  
Old Dec 19, 2010 | 11:27 am
  #42  
Moderator: Smoking Lounge; FlyerTalk Evangelist
10 Countries Visited
1M
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: SFO
Programs: Lifetime (for now) Gold MM, HH Gold, Giving Tootsie Pops to UA employees, & a retired hockey goalie
Posts: 29,078
Originally Posted by FriendlySkies
I was at MCO this morning, and noticed something that I have never seen. Two & Three stripe clerks were wandering through the lines of pax waiting for the TDC, questioning them about the trips... From what I heard, they were asking questions about destinations, who they were visiting, etc... Do we still have the ability to refuse these questions as we have not entered the checkpoint, or will we run into the same clerk that last night told me that we have no rights?
BDO's doing their best to keep us safe

No, you do not have to answer any questions and when I have been "asked" both by TSO's in uniform and plainclothes (the ear piece kinda gave it away ), I simply told them to "please use their BDO training to "spot" someone else". Took them a few seconds to pick their jaw up off the floor but that was it and they went away.
goalie is offline  
Old Dec 19, 2010 | 12:48 pm
  #43  
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: DCA / WAS
Programs: DL 2+ million/PM, YX, Marriott Plt, *wood gold, HHonors, CO Plt, UA, AA EXP, WN, AGR
Posts: 9,386
Originally Posted by Wally Bird
And that would be a bad thing because.... ?
Do you believe that a dog will scare a determined terrorist? If you believe that, I invite you to see how some folks are able to beat polygraphs.

Note to Pistole: You're not a cop anymore, the primary purpose of the TSA is not to catch terrorists. Or criminals or deadbeat dads or underage college kids etc., etc.
Global_Hi_Flyer is offline  
Old Dec 19, 2010 | 1:31 pm
  #44  
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,972
Originally Posted by Global_Hi_Flyer
Do you believe that a dog will scare a determined terrorist? If you believe that, I invite you to see how some folks are able to beat polygraphs.
"Know your enemy" is very important. I don't think there are very many "determined terrorists". People who are getting mentally prepared to kill themselves aren't exactly in a great mental state and I don't think that comparing them to people who have learned to beat polygraphs is realistic. It won't take much to disrupt the delicate mental balance suicide bombers have formed.
RichardKenner is offline  
Old Dec 19, 2010 | 1:41 pm
  #45  
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 629
I don't think there are very many "terrorists" period, but the few that actually exist I think are quite determined. There are plenty of people who are quite prepared to kill themselves. Even eager. A dog isn't going to stop them. And they certainly aren't going to be afraid of one no matter how large and ferocious. If you have no fear of death I think it's pretty reasonable to assume that you won't be too afraid of dogs either. I don't think a suicidal person has any sort of "delicate mental balance". It is a stable condition. They have committed to dying for a cause that they believe in. What they consider a noble cause. If they are discovered by a dog they can just blow themselves up, preferably in the most crowded area possible. A busy checkpoint could be even better in terms of casualties, fear, and potential political change than an airplane. I can just imagine that they would love to see the effect of that on security procedures. Pre-checkpoints would surely be the result. And then pre-pre-checkpoints ad infinitum. It would almost be funny if it weren't so ridiculous.
gojirasan is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.