Community
Wiki Posts
Search

While opt-outs wait...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 18, 2010 | 12:17 pm
  #1  
Original Poster
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: YVR
Programs: Aeroplan, AAdvantage
Posts: 2,107
While opt-outs wait...

Don't we get even more radiation as we wait just a few steps from the machine...? It can take 2-3 passengers going through the machine to actually be processed as an opt out. No: I am not a troll, TSO etc review my past posts, I am genuinely concerned.
chx1975 is offline  
Old Dec 18, 2010 | 12:18 pm
  #2  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Programs: United
Posts: 2,710
Originally Posted by chx1975
Don't we get even more radiation as we wait just a few steps from the machine...? It can take 2-3 passengers going through the machine to actually be processed as an opt out. No: I am not a troll, TSO etc review my past posts, I am genuinely concerned.
I just wouldn't stand by the openings.
Combat Medic is offline  
Old Dec 18, 2010 | 12:30 pm
  #3  
Original Poster
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: YVR
Programs: Aeroplan, AAdvantage
Posts: 2,107
So we presume the sides of these are shielded?
chx1975 is offline  
Old Dec 18, 2010 | 12:30 pm
  #4  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: An NPR mind living in a Fox News world
Posts: 14,343
Originally Posted by chx1975
Don't we get even more radiation as we wait just a few steps from the machine...? It can take 2-3 passengers going through the machine to actually be processed as an opt out. No: I am not a troll, TSO etc review my past posts, I am genuinely concerned.
There is a Johns Hopkins Applied Physics Lab report which stated that there needd to be more testing done to determine a safe distance from the machines. They did some analysis which recommended that a safe distance, pending further testing, was something like 14' above the machine (i.e.: the next floor above in most cases), 6' behind, and 4' to either side because they couldn't determine if radiation levels within these distances was within safe levels. Radiation follows the inverse square law. For example, the radiation 8' from either side would be 1/4 of what it would be at 4' away.

In other words, give yourself a wide berth and err on the conservative side while the screeners happily x-ray passengers, blissfully ignorant.
FliesWay2Much is offline  
Old Dec 18, 2010 | 12:42 pm
  #5  
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: FLL & PIT
Programs: Marriott Platinum for Life.
Posts: 1,235
In all radiology practices we must be a minimum of 6 feet from the x-ray source.

So I would practice the same procedures for the backscatter x-ray machines.


But the TSA can stand right next to them for all I care.



.
trvlr64 is offline  
Old Dec 18, 2010 | 12:43 pm
  #6  
Ari
FlyerTalk Evangelist
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Chicago
Posts: 11,664
Originally Posted by trvlr64
But the TSA can stand right next to them for all I care.
Darwin at work from the grave.
Ari is offline  
Old Dec 18, 2010 | 1:06 pm
  #7  
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 453
Do TSA Agents who are pregnant operate these machines? If the TSA has a policy that pregnant TSA Agents can't operate these machines while they are pregnant then that proves that they don't think a pregnant woman should be near them. Also if they do allow pregnant TSA Agents to operate these machines. Then when these female agents give birth to children who were harmed due to radiation exposure. Then them being safe for pregnant women will be proven to be false.
Lara21 is offline  
Old Dec 18, 2010 | 1:11 pm
  #8  
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: LAS
Posts: 1,279
As long as the machine is built correctly, installed correctly, maintained correctly, calibrated correctly, and operated correctly, you shouldn't have much to worry about if your not inside or near the opening.

Given the excellence demonstrated in everything else TSA does and the high quality of the employees in that fine agency, you should be fine.

backScatterX
ScatterX is offline  
Old Dec 18, 2010 | 2:02 pm
  #9  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
30 Countries Visited
1M
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Northeast Kansas | Colorado Native
Programs: Amex Gold/Plat, UA *G, Hyatt Globalist, IHG Plat Marriott LT Gold, NEXUS, TSA Disparager Unobtanium
Posts: 22,642
Originally Posted by ScatterX
Given the excellence demonstrated in everything else TSA does and the high quality of the employees in that fine agency, you should be fine.


Was that at attempt at sarcasm, or do you really believe that?

I guess the same high quality employees that told me I have no right last night are part of your TSA

OP, if I were you, I'd put about 8-10' between you and the Backscatter!
FriendlySkies is offline  
Old Dec 18, 2010 | 3:11 pm
  #10  
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: LAS
Posts: 1,279
Originally Posted by FriendlySkies
Was that at attempt at sarcasm, or do you really believe that?
Absolutely. I don't think the TSA could maintain or properly operate a lunch box.

Originally Posted by FriendlySkies
OP, if I were you, I'd put about 8-10' between you and the Backscatter!
Good advice. ^^^ Distance and shielding. If you don't have the latter, you better have the former.
ScatterX is offline  
Old Dec 18, 2010 | 6:43 pm
  #11  
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 55
Originally Posted by Lara21
Do TSA Agents who are pregnant operate these machines? If the TSA has a policy that pregnant TSA Agents can't operate these machines while they are pregnant then that proves that they don't think a pregnant woman should be near them. Also if they do allow pregnant TSA Agents to operate these machines. Then when these female agents give birth to children who were harmed due to radiation exposure. Then them being safe for pregnant women will be proven to be false.
Lara21,

Now that is an excellent question and observation!

When I had my lower spine xrayed recently, the dr asked me beforehand if I was pregnant. I told him i wasn't, so the xray was ok.
yautjalady is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.