Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Maintenance requirements for AIT?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 6, 2010 | 7:20 pm
  #16  
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: SEA/ORD/ADB
Programs: TK ELPL (*G), AS 100K (OWE), BA Gold (OWE), Hyatt Globalist, Hilton Diamond, Marriott Plat, IHG Plat
Posts: 7,774
Originally Posted by cardiomd
Bhutan doesn't really have a president, but I assume you meant King, or else perhaps the prime minister? Very long story how I became quite familiar with politics there in travels.

Yeah, the American anti-intellectualism is ridiculous, but fortunately is uniquely American. India, Europe, and Asia rightly prizes intelligence.

In America, it's cool to be smart only to the extent it can make you MONEY.

Well, his name is Jigme Wangchuck (probably royally misspelled). I don't know what he is, but I know he is basically the head of the gov't of Bhutan.

And, in most places, I'd assume its cool to be smart because it makes you money. In most cultures, money is king. Its simple math.
smart = money
money = the deluded sense that you will be insanely happy

Most people desire the deluded sense that they will be insanely happy, therefore by the transitive property of equality, most people desire to be smart. Of course, in America, we are anti-intellectual, so we can't do simple math :P
PVDtoDEL is offline  
Old Dec 6, 2010 | 7:24 pm
  #17  
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 3,004
Lots of folks follow the money trail, it is a natural by-product of intelligent, creative people...
IslandBased is offline  
Old Dec 6, 2010 | 7:43 pm
  #18  
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Programs: SSSSS
Posts: 867
Originally Posted by sbagdon
Has there been any reports of the maintenance requirements and costs (either preventative, or repair/replace) of any of the AIT technologies?

These units have been implemented rather recently, so their up-time will be predictably high. Yet was wondering what their reliability was, at least in regards to costs (hey, we are paying for these, after all). Are they based on currently implemented technology (eg: hospitals, industrial, etc), easily maintained and/or repaired, are they modularized for servicing back at the plant, etc?

Are there any concerns that we're going to start seeing these out-of-service for use-based maintenance, field-calibration, repair, etc? Has the TSA indicated what they're going to do with the WTMD (leave them at the airport storage) in case there's a strategic need to over-populate the lanes, etc?

The WTMDs appears to be (technologically) simple (including field calibration by the TSOs), and the reports on the puffers speak for themselves. Thoughts on the operation impact of AIT reliability and predictability?
I have been told by another FTer that the medical physics lists are highly concerned that not only are there no maintenance services, but TSA does not do daily/weekly/monthly output checks (to determine the radiation emission levels), or calibration checks. If the machine were to malfunction it may not be apparent.

TSOs using these things: you seen any calibration checks/operational checks? If so, how frequent?
greentips is offline  
Old Dec 6, 2010 | 7:46 pm
  #19  
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: SEA/ORD/ADB
Programs: TK ELPL (*G), AS 100K (OWE), BA Gold (OWE), Hyatt Globalist, Hilton Diamond, Marriott Plat, IHG Plat
Posts: 7,774
Originally Posted by exbayern
In one long thread there was a post from someone claiming to work for the company producing the AIT machines (an engineer, I believe). He said that TSA chose not to purchase the recommended maintenance package which the manufacturer can provide.
I remember that well. It was a big deal back then. The credibility of the source was highly disputed, if I can remember correctly
PVDtoDEL is offline  
Old Dec 6, 2010 | 7:49 pm
  #20  
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Colorado
Programs: TSA
Posts: 2,745
Originally Posted by sbagdon
Has there been any reports of the maintenance requirements and costs (either preventative, or repair/replace) of any of the AIT technologies?

These units have been implemented rather recently, so their up-time will be predictably high. Yet was wondering what their reliability was, at least in regards to costs (hey, we are paying for these, after all). Are they based on currently implemented technology (eg: hospitals, industrial, etc), easily maintained and/or repaired, are they modularized for servicing back at the plant, etc?

Are there any concerns that we're going to start seeing these out-of-service for use-based maintenance, field-calibration, repair, etc? Has the TSA indicated what they're going to do with the WTMD (leave them at the airport storage) in case there's a strategic need to over-populate the lanes, etc?

The WTMDs appears to be (technologically) simple (including field calibration by the TSOs), and the reports on the puffers speak for themselves. Thoughts on the operation impact of AIT reliability and predictability?
I have not seen the info on the maintenance other than to say that it is performed on 90 day intervals buy the OEM. We have had a MMW machine in DEN for over 2 years and it has performed remarkably well and has good "up time."
Most of the equipment that is bought has a one year warranty is supported for that whole year by the maker. In older equipment it is bid out to maintenance companies like Siemens.
The big players in the arena are Morpho detection, GE, Smiths Detection, Siemens and L3.
eyecue is offline  
Old Dec 6, 2010 | 7:52 pm
  #21  
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: SEA/ORD/ADB
Programs: TK ELPL (*G), AS 100K (OWE), BA Gold (OWE), Hyatt Globalist, Hilton Diamond, Marriott Plat, IHG Plat
Posts: 7,774
Originally Posted by eyecue
I have not seen the info on the maintenance other than to say that it is performed on 90 day intervals buy the OEM. We have had a MMW machine in DEN for over 2 years and it has performed remarkably well and has good "up time."
Most of the equipment that is bought has a one year warranty is supported for that whole year by the maker. In older equipment it is bid out to maintenance companies like Siemens.
The big players in the arena are Morpho detection, GE, Smiths Detection, Siemens and L3.
I believe that the possible maintenance issues brought up by the engineer that were referenced earlier were on Backscatter machines
PVDtoDEL is offline  
Old Dec 6, 2010 | 7:53 pm
  #22  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
30 Countries Visited
1M
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Northeast Kansas | Colorado Native
Programs: Amex Gold/Plat, UA *G, Hyatt Globalist, IHG Plat Marriott LT Gold, NEXUS, TSA Disparager Unobtanium
Posts: 22,657
What a huge waste of money Just wait until the next "threat" appears
FriendlySkies is offline  
Old Dec 7, 2010 | 4:37 am
  #23  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: DTW
Programs: DL 0.22 MM, AA 0.34 MM, PC Plat Amb, Hertz #1 GC 5*
Posts: 7,511
Originally Posted by eyecue
I have not seen the info on the maintenance other than to say that it is performed on 90 day intervals buy the OEM. We have had a MMW machine in DEN for over 2 years and it has performed remarkably well and has good "up time."
Most of the equipment that is bought has a one year warranty is supported for that whole year by the maker. In older equipment it is bid out to maintenance companies like Siemens.
The big players in the arena are Morpho detection, GE, Smiths Detection, Siemens and L3.
Thanks for the empirical data.

Any concerns by the operators, say noises, screen quality changing, etc?

Having seen previous all-in simple-tech to high-tech transitions go bad, and all operations coming to a halt (and people screaming where's the old stuff). Just wondering what the strategic process is to ensure there's enough processing capability to deal with these AITs, when they start to get flaky.
sbagdon is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.