Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Another good one from Drudge.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 6, 2010 | 12:03 pm
  #1  
Original Poster
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: BOS,PIT
Programs: Marriott Lifetime Platinum, JetBlue Mosaic-2, AA Platinum
Posts: 562
Another good one from Drudge.

At least we seem to have one ally in the media.

http://www.aolnews.com/weird-news/ar...est=latestnews
jfunk138 is offline  
Old Dec 6, 2010 | 12:13 pm
  #2  
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: BOS
Programs: UA 1P
Posts: 1,356
"I must have overlooked the clause in both my Playboy and 'Baywatch' contracts stating that once appearing in that magazine, or on that show, I would forever be subject to being seen naked live and in person by anyone, at anytime, under any conditions, whether I agree to it or not, and for free," she said sarcastically.

"I posed for Playboy 15 years ago. I was on 'Baywatch' 13 years ago. Both of those were controlled environments, with proper lighting, makeup, etc., and were jobs. I contractually agreed to do both of those jobs. I could have stopped or changed my mind at any time. None of those conditions are present when TSA decides for you that you will consent to being scanned or felt up, or you simply won't be allowed your constitutional right to travel from one place to another freely."
That was a great quote from her. Very well spoken and straight to the point. Especially addresses the, "I don't care if someone sees me naked" crowd as she obviously doesn't care that people have, what she cares about is her right to stop being seen naked at any point in time.
JennyElf is offline  
Old Dec 6, 2010 | 12:32 pm
  #3  
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 5,051
I still say that anyone who doesn't care WHO sees them owes us their address and a good time to plant ourselves where we can watch them through their windows. And a call to the local police to instruct them to leave us alone because they are proving the really don't care who sees them naked. Short of that, I think they're blowing smoke.
LuvAirFrance is offline  
Old Dec 6, 2010 | 12:32 pm
  #4  
Original Poster
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: BOS,PIT
Programs: Marriott Lifetime Platinum, JetBlue Mosaic-2, AA Platinum
Posts: 562
Originally Posted by jfunk138
At least we seem to have one ally in the media.

http://www.aolnews.com/weird-news/ar...est=latestnews
I just noticed something funny in the link... This was apparently classified as "weird news." Now we know how aolnews.com feels about people that object to the NOS
jfunk138 is offline  
Old Dec 6, 2010 | 12:40 pm
  #5  
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 48
That really does not belong as "weird." It's just the tip of the iceberg. Even underage girls have been leered and subjected to this, clearly selected on the basis of their appearance.

And this is absolutely a case of the terrorists having won.
If we subject our daughters to this kind of violation, we are handing those "honor"-obsessed Islamists a victory beyond their wildest dreams.
ocschwar is offline  
Old Dec 6, 2010 | 12:54 pm
  #6  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: DTW
Programs: DL 0.22 MM, AA 0.34 MM, PC Plat Amb, Hertz #1 GC 5*
Posts: 7,511
That's when a TSA agent took her by the elbow and told her she needed to "come this way."

Touching without consent, isn't that assault?

She had a choice between privacy and flying, and she choose flying. If we hear from her again, and she flies again, what does that mean?

Last edited by sbagdon; Dec 6, 2010 at 1:04 pm
sbagdon is offline  
Old Dec 6, 2010 | 1:00 pm
  #7  
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 5,051
Oh, that SO sounds like the plot of a child porn movie!!!
LuvAirFrance is offline  
Old Dec 6, 2010 | 6:38 pm
  #8  
30 Countries Visited
Community Builder
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Sydney (for now), GVA (only in my memories)
Programs: QF Lifetime Silver (big whoop)
Posts: 9,316
My favorite part is
Originally Posted by AOLNews
TSA spokesman Nico Melendez thinks D'Errico's claims aren't accurate.

"If you see the images, you'll know it's not a naked picture," he said.
1) I think a few of Nico's claims aren't accurate, either. Ironic.
and
2) The quote above is right next to a NoS image which is so OBVIOUSLY a naked picture. See item (1).
RadioGirl is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.